BUILDING TRUST IN UNIVERSITY-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION IN INDONESIA: A MIXED METHODS STUDY
Abstract
Trust in others is shown when an individual is prepared to prioritize their well-being without considering potential risks, driven by their unwavering belief in the moral integrity of others. The research investigates the degree of trust between students and teachers in English language instruction. It examines the underlying factors contributing to this trust and investigate the strategies teachers and students use to establish trust. The researcher used a mixed methods approach by integrating questionnaires and interviews to gather data for this study. The surveys were provided to 265 students using convenient sampling, while the interviews were purposefully conducted with ten lecturers and 18 students. The researcher used descriptive statistics to analyze the data obtained from the questionnaire. Given that 63.7 % of students express trust in their instructors, the findings suggest that the degree of trust between students and professors is typically positive in the context of university-level English instruction. The interview data were examined using open, axial, and selective coding techniques. The study's findings indicate a reciprocal trust between students and teachers, with students demonstrating a solid foundation for this trust. In response, lecturers possess effective strategies for cultivating students' trustReferences
Amerstorfer, C. M., & Freiin von Münster-Kistner, C. (2021). Student Perceptions of Academic Engagement and Student-Teacher Relationships in Problem-Based Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(October), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713057
Barney, J. B., & Hansen, M. H. (1994). Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15(1 S), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150912
Besley, J. C., & Dudo, A. (2022). Strategic communication as planned behavior for science and risk communication: A theory-based approach to studying communicator choice. Risk Analysis, 42(11), 2584–2592. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14029
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide (Vol. 01). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Breuer, C., Hüffmeier, J., Hibben, F., & Hertel, G. (2020). Trust in teams: A taxonomy of perceived trustworthiness factors and risk-taking behaviors in face-to-face and virtual teams. Human Relations, 73(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718818721
Brower, H. H., Lester, S. W., Korsgaard, A. M., & Dineen, B. R. (2009). A closer look at trust between managers and subordinates: Understanding the effects of both trusting and being trusted on subordinate outcomes. In Journal of Management (Vol. 35, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307312511
Chiou, E. K., & Lee, J. D. (2023). Trusting Automation: Designing for Responsivity and Resilience. Human Factors, 65(1), 137–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211009995
Colquitt, J. A., & Baer, M. D. (2023). Foster Trust Through Ability, Benevolence, and Integrity. In E. A. Locke & C. L. Pearce (Eds.), Principles of organizational behavior : the handbook of evidence-based management. Wiley.
Colquitt, J. A., & Salam, S. C. (2009). Foster Trust through Ability, Benevolence, and Integrity. In E. Locke (Ed.), Handbook of principles of organizational behavior. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, Trustworthiness, and Trust Propensity: A Meta-Analytic Test of Their Unique Relationships With Risk Taking and Job Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 909–927. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909
Creswell, J. W. (2022). A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research Second Edition. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. In SAGE Publications.
Cutri, J., Abraham, A., Karlina, Y., Patel, S. V., Moharami, M., Zeng, S., Manzari, E., & Pretorius, L. (2021). Academic integrity at doctoral level: the influence of the imposter phenomenon and cultural differences on academic writing. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00074-w
Demir, E. K. (2021). The role of social capital for teacher professional learning and student achievement: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 33(February 2020), 100391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100391
Dinesen, P. T., Schaeffer, M., & Oslashnderskov, K. M. (2020). Ethnic Diversity and Social Trust: A Narrative and Meta-Analytical Review. Annual Review of Political Science, 23, 441–465. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052918-020708
Drolet, M. J., Rose-Derouin, E., Leblanc, J. C., Ruest, M., & Williams-Jones, B. (2023). Ethical Issues in Research: Perceptions of Researchers, Research Ethics Board Members and Research Ethics Experts. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21(2), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-022-09455-3
Firmansyah, M. R., Amelia, R., Jamil, R. A., Faturochman, F., & Minza, W. M. (2019). Benevolence, Competency, and Integrity: Which Is More Influential on Trust in Friendships? Jurnal Psikologi, 18(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.14710/jp.18.1.91-105
Fooladi, E. C. (2020). Between Education and Opinion-Making: Dialogue between Didactic/Didaktik Models from Science Education and Science Communication in the Times of a Pandemic. Science and Education, 29(5), 1117–1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00156-0
Heyns, M., & Rothmann, S. (2015). Dimensionality of trust: An analysis of the relations between propensity, trustworthiness and trust. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 41(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v41i1.1263
Hossain, Z., Çelik, Ö., & Hertel, C. (2024). Academic integrity and copyright literacy policy and instruction in K-12 schools: a global study from the perspective of school library professionals. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00150-x
Hussain, S., Melewar, T. C., Priporas, C. V., Foroudi, P., & Yusef, W. (2021). Understanding Celebrity Trust and Its Effects on Other Credibility and Image Constructs: A Qualitative Approach. Corporate Reputation Review, 24(4), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-020-00107-z
Hyndman, N., Liguori, M., & McKillop, D. (2021). Many stones can form an arch, singly none: (Re-)establishing trust in charities. Financial Accountability and Management, 37(4), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12286
Khatun, N. (2021). Applications of Normality Test in Statistical Analysis. Open Journal of Statistics, 11(01), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2021.111006
Kincade, L., Cook, C., & Goerdt, A. (2020). Meta-Analysis and Common Practice Elements of Universal Approaches to Improving Student-Teacher Relationships. 90(5), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320946836
Kmieciak, R. (2020). Trust, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behavior: empirical evidence from Poland. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2020-0134
Lount, R. B., & Pettit, N. C. (2012). The social context of trust: The role of status. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.005
Maharana, K., Mondal, S., & Nemade, B. (2022). A review: Data pre-processing and data augmentation techniques. Global Transitions Proceedings, 3(1), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gltp.2022.04.020
Mumu, J. R., Saona, P., Mamun, M. A. Al, & Azad, M. A. K. (2022). Is Trust Gender Biased? A Bibliometric Review of Trust in E-Commerce. Journal of Internet Commerce, 21(2), 217–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2021.1927437
Murray, C., & Zvoch, K. (2011). The inventory of teacher-student relationships: Factor structure, reliability, and validity among african american youth in low-income urban schools. Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(4), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431610366250
Niedlich, S., Kallfaß, A., Pohle, S., & Bormann, I. (2021). A comprehensive view of trust in education: Conclusions from a systematic literature review. Review of Education, 9(1), 124–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3239
Nielsen, B. B. (2004). The role of trust in collaborative relationships: A multi-dimensional approach. Management, 7(3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.073.0239
Orcan, F. (2020). Parametric or Non-parametric: Skewness to Test Normality for Mean Comparison. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(2), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.656077
Qureshi, H. A., & Ünlü, Z. (2020). Beyond the Paradigm Conflicts: A Four-Step Coding Instrument for Grounded Theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920928188
Rheu, M., Shin, J. Y., Peng, W., & Huh-Yoo, J. (2021). Systematic Review: Trust-Building Factors and Implications for Conversational Agent Design. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 37(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1807710
Schilke, O., Reimann, M., & Cook, K. S. (2021). Trust in Social Relations. Annual Review of Sociology, 47, 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-082120-082850
Shayo, H. J., Rao, C., & Kakupa, P. (2021). Conceptualization and Measurement of Trust in Home–School Contexts: A Scoping Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(November), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.742917
Spadaro, G., Gangl, K., van Prooijen, J. W., van Lange, P. A. M., & Mosso, C. O. (2020). Enhancing feelings of security: How institutional trust promotes interpersonal trust. PLoS ONE, 15(9 September), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237934
Svare, H., Gausdal, A. H., & Möllering, G. (2020). The function of ability, benevolence, and integrity-based trust in innovation networks. Industry and Innovation, 27(6), 585–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1632695
Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Tong, S. C., & Chan, F. F. Y. (2022). Revisiting trust in the digital era: the interplay of online trust and online dialogic communication from the practitioners’ perspective. Journal of Communication Management, 26(3), 271–293. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-08-2021-0094
Viola, L. A., & Laidler, P. (2021). On the relationship between trust, transparency, and surveillance. In Trust and Transparency in an Age of Surveillance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003120827
Waber, J., Hagenauer, G., & de Zordo, L. (2022). Student teachers’ perceptions of trust during the team practicum. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1803269
Zhang, M. (2021). Assessing Two Dimensions of Interpersonal Trust: Other-Focused Trust and Propensity to Trust. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(July), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.654735