BUILDING TRUST IN UNIVERSITY-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION IN INDONESIA: A MIXED METHODS STUDY

Suryanto Suryanto

Abstract


Trust in others is shown when an individual is prepared to prioritize their well-being without considering potential risks, driven by their unwavering belief in the moral integrity of others. The research investigates the degree of trust between students and teachers in English language instruction. It examines the underlying factors contributing to this trust and investigate the strategies teachers and students use to establish trust. The researcher used a mixed methods approach by integrating questionnaires and interviews to gather data for this study. The surveys were provided to 265 students using convenient sampling, while the interviews were purposefully conducted with ten lecturers and 18 students. The researcher used descriptive statistics to analyze the data obtained from the questionnaire. Given that 63.7 % of students express trust in their instructors, the findings suggest that the degree of trust between students and professors is typically positive in the context of university-level English instruction. The interview data were examined using open, axial, and selective coding techniques. The study's findings indicate a reciprocal trust between students and teachers, with students demonstrating a solid foundation for this trust. In response, lecturers possess effective strategies for cultivating students' trust

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amerstorfer, C. M., & Freiin von Münster-Kistner, C. (2021). Student Perceptions of Academic Engagement and Student-Teacher Relationships in Problem-Based Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(October), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713057

Barney, J. B., & Hansen, M. H. (1994). Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15(1 S), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150912

Besley, J. C., & Dudo, A. (2022). Strategic communication as planned behavior for science and risk communication: A theory-based approach to studying communicator choice. Risk Analysis, 42(11), 2584–2592. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14029

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide (Vol. 01). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Breuer, C., Hüffmeier, J., Hibben, F., & Hertel, G. (2020). Trust in teams: A taxonomy of perceived trustworthiness factors and risk-taking behaviors in face-to-face and virtual teams. Human Relations, 73(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718818721

Brower, H. H., Lester, S. W., Korsgaard, A. M., & Dineen, B. R. (2009). A closer look at trust between managers and subordinates: Understanding the effects of both trusting and being trusted on subordinate outcomes. In Journal of Management (Vol. 35, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307312511

Chiou, E. K., & Lee, J. D. (2023). Trusting Automation: Designing for Responsivity and Resilience. Human Factors, 65(1), 137–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211009995

Colquitt, J. A., & Baer, M. D. (2023). Foster Trust Through Ability, Benevolence, and Integrity. In E. A. Locke & C. L. Pearce (Eds.), Principles of organizational behavior : the handbook of evidence-based management. Wiley.

Colquitt, J. A., & Salam, S. C. (2009). Foster Trust through Ability, Benevolence, and Integrity. In E. Locke (Ed.), Handbook of principles of organizational behavior. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, Trustworthiness, and Trust Propensity: A Meta-Analytic Test of Their Unique Relationships With Risk Taking and Job Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 909–927. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909

Creswell, J. W. (2022). A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research Second Edition. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. In SAGE Publications.

Cutri, J., Abraham, A., Karlina, Y., Patel, S. V., Moharami, M., Zeng, S., Manzari, E., & Pretorius, L. (2021). Academic integrity at doctoral level: the influence of the imposter phenomenon and cultural differences on academic writing. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00074-w

Demir, E. K. (2021). The role of social capital for teacher professional learning and student achievement: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 33(February 2020), 100391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100391

Dinesen, P. T., Schaeffer, M., & Oslashnderskov, K. M. (2020). Ethnic Diversity and Social Trust: A Narrative and Meta-Analytical Review. Annual Review of Political Science, 23, 441–465. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052918-020708

Drolet, M. J., Rose-Derouin, E., Leblanc, J. C., Ruest, M., & Williams-Jones, B. (2023). Ethical Issues in Research: Perceptions of Researchers, Research Ethics Board Members and Research Ethics Experts. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21(2), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-022-09455-3

Firmansyah, M. R., Amelia, R., Jamil, R. A., Faturochman, F., & Minza, W. M. (2019). Benevolence, Competency, and Integrity: Which Is More Influential on Trust in Friendships? Jurnal Psikologi, 18(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.14710/jp.18.1.91-105

Fooladi, E. C. (2020). Between Education and Opinion-Making: Dialogue between Didactic/Didaktik Models from Science Education and Science Communication in the Times of a Pandemic. Science and Education, 29(5), 1117–1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00156-0

Heyns, M., & Rothmann, S. (2015). Dimensionality of trust: An analysis of the relations between propensity, trustworthiness and trust. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 41(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v41i1.1263

Hossain, Z., Çelik, Ö., & Hertel, C. (2024). Academic integrity and copyright literacy policy and instruction in K-12 schools: a global study from the perspective of school library professionals. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00150-x

Hussain, S., Melewar, T. C., Priporas, C. V., Foroudi, P., & Yusef, W. (2021). Understanding Celebrity Trust and Its Effects on Other Credibility and Image Constructs: A Qualitative Approach. Corporate Reputation Review, 24(4), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-020-00107-z

Hyndman, N., Liguori, M., & McKillop, D. (2021). Many stones can form an arch, singly none: (Re-)establishing trust in charities. Financial Accountability and Management, 37(4), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12286

Khatun, N. (2021). Applications of Normality Test in Statistical Analysis. Open Journal of Statistics, 11(01), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2021.111006

Kincade, L., Cook, C., & Goerdt, A. (2020). Meta-Analysis and Common Practice Elements of Universal Approaches to Improving Student-Teacher Relationships. 90(5), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320946836

Kmieciak, R. (2020). Trust, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behavior: empirical evidence from Poland. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2020-0134

Lount, R. B., & Pettit, N. C. (2012). The social context of trust: The role of status. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.005

Maharana, K., Mondal, S., & Nemade, B. (2022). A review: Data pre-processing and data augmentation techniques. Global Transitions Proceedings, 3(1), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gltp.2022.04.020

Mumu, J. R., Saona, P., Mamun, M. A. Al, & Azad, M. A. K. (2022). Is Trust Gender Biased? A Bibliometric Review of Trust in E-Commerce. Journal of Internet Commerce, 21(2), 217–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2021.1927437

Murray, C., & Zvoch, K. (2011). The inventory of teacher-student relationships: Factor structure, reliability, and validity among african american youth in low-income urban schools. Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(4), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431610366250

Niedlich, S., Kallfaß, A., Pohle, S., & Bormann, I. (2021). A comprehensive view of trust in education: Conclusions from a systematic literature review. Review of Education, 9(1), 124–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3239

Nielsen, B. B. (2004). The role of trust in collaborative relationships: A multi-dimensional approach. Management, 7(3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.073.0239

Orcan, F. (2020). Parametric or Non-parametric: Skewness to Test Normality for Mean Comparison. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(2), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.656077

Qureshi, H. A., & Ünlü, Z. (2020). Beyond the Paradigm Conflicts: A Four-Step Coding Instrument for Grounded Theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920928188

Rheu, M., Shin, J. Y., Peng, W., & Huh-Yoo, J. (2021). Systematic Review: Trust-Building Factors and Implications for Conversational Agent Design. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 37(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1807710

Schilke, O., Reimann, M., & Cook, K. S. (2021). Trust in Social Relations. Annual Review of Sociology, 47, 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-082120-082850

Shayo, H. J., Rao, C., & Kakupa, P. (2021). Conceptualization and Measurement of Trust in Home–School Contexts: A Scoping Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(November), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.742917

Spadaro, G., Gangl, K., van Prooijen, J. W., van Lange, P. A. M., & Mosso, C. O. (2020). Enhancing feelings of security: How institutional trust promotes interpersonal trust. PLoS ONE, 15(9 September), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237934

Svare, H., Gausdal, A. H., & Möllering, G. (2020). The function of ability, benevolence, and integrity-based trust in innovation networks. Industry and Innovation, 27(6), 585–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1632695

Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Tong, S. C., & Chan, F. F. Y. (2022). Revisiting trust in the digital era: the interplay of online trust and online dialogic communication from the practitioners’ perspective. Journal of Communication Management, 26(3), 271–293. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-08-2021-0094

Viola, L. A., & Laidler, P. (2021). On the relationship between trust, transparency, and surveillance. In Trust and Transparency in an Age of Surveillance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003120827

Waber, J., Hagenauer, G., & de Zordo, L. (2022). Student teachers’ perceptions of trust during the team practicum. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1803269

Zhang, M. (2021). Assessing Two Dimensions of Interpersonal Trust: Other-Focused Trust and Propensity to Trust. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(July), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.654735




DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/ijli.v7i1.9543

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.