AN ANALYSIS OF NEEDS FOR INCUBATION IN CREATIVE PROCESS AS A RECOMMENDATION FOR LEISURE FACILITY DESIGN IN A CO-WORKING SPACE

Diena Yudiarti, Hani Amalia

Abstract


ABSTRACT

 

Creative People are known to be different in their perceptions and interpretations of their work problems, depending on the characteristics of the current situation occur (Dorst & Cross, 2001). The creative process that people usually see cannot be seized by any methodology, but the creative people actually implements different types of methods. Methods that have flexibility in processes, actions, and appreciations (Roozenburg & Dorst, 1998; Stempfle & Badke-Schaub, 2002). Creative people usually have unique characteristics while doing their job. They need some supportive situations or environments to embrace the imagination as they create an idea of the creative process. Sometimes, the ideas come out in unexpected situations, either in a relaxed situation or under pressure situations. The second stage of creative thinking from the four stages presented by Graham Wallas (1926) is the Incubation Stage which becomes the focus of this research. The need for the incubation stage will be used as one of the variables of the user aspect approach for leisure facility design which is the output expectation from this research for the recommendation of designing the facility in a Co-Working Space.

 

Keywords: Characteristic Analysis, Incubation, Creative Process, Leisure Time, Leisure Facility, Co-Working Space


References


REFERENCES

Best, K. (2006). Design Management: Managing Design Strategy, Process and Implementation. AVA Publishing SA. ISBN: 978-2-940373-12-3.

Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. Harper Collins Publisher. ISBN: B002PEP4EG.

Charron, P. (2011). Divergent Thinking vs Convergent Thinking. Think Brownstone Inc.

Creswell, J. W. (2013) Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Third Edition. SAGE Publications, Inc. ISBN: 978-1-4129-9530-6.

Cross, N. (2001). Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline versus Design Science. Design Issues, 17(3), 49-55

Cross, N. (2011). Design Thinking: Understanding How Designer Think and Work. Berg Bloomsburry Publishing Plc. ISBN: 978-1-84788-637-8.

Lawson, B. (2005). How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified. Fourth Edition. Architectural Press Elsevier. ISBN-13: 978-0-7506-6077-8.

Neuman, W.L. (2006). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sixth Edition. Pearson International Edition. ISBN: 0-205-45793-2

Stempfle, J., Badke-Schaub, P. (2002). Thinking in Design Teams: An Analysis of Team Communication. Design Studies, 23, 473-496.

Stewart, S. C. (2011) Interpreting Design Thinking. Design Studies, 32(6), 515-520

Wallas, G. (1926). The Art of Thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.

Ward, A., Runcie, E., Morris, L. (2009). Embedding Innovation: Design Thinking for Small Enterprises. Journal of Business Strategy, 30(2), 78-84.

Yudiarti, D., Lantu, D.C. (2015). Organizing Creative People in Creative Industry: Preliminary Study About Implementation of Design Thinking in Indonesia. Proceedings of 5th Business, Economics and Communications International Conference. Phitsanulok, Thailand.

Yudiarti, D., Lantu, D.C. (2017). Implementation Creative Thinking for Undergraduate Student: A Case Study of First Year Student in Business School. Advanced Science Letters, 23(8), 7254-7257.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/balong.v3i1.5471

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.