Family Ownership, Commisioners Independence and Corporate Social Responsibility in Indonesian Corporate

Siti Nuke Nurfatimah


This study examined the effect of family ownership percentage rate on the disclosure of CSR information by family companies in Indonesia after the establishment of regulations issued by the Ministry of Environment in 2012. Disclosure of CSR is measured by content analysis method which refers to the GRI G3.1. In addition, this study also added a moderating effect, namely independent commissioners who acting as independent supervisors of a company. Independent commissioners are measured using the percentage of independent commissioners in the company. This study used a samples of all family companies in Indonesia except financial companies for 2013 to 2015. The hypothesis testing was carried out using panel data regression analysis both before and after involving moderating effects.


Abbas, A. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility ( CSR ) Lingkungan dan Implementasinya di Indonesia : Perspektif Kritis di bawah Ajaran Teori Legitimasi. The Indonesian Social Justice Network.

Cabeza-garc, L., Sacrist-navarro, M., & Gez-ans, S. (2017). Family involvement and corporate social responsibility disclosure. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 8(2), 209122.

Chen, Y. C., Hung, M., & Wang, Y. (2018). The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 65(1), 169190.

Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Rodruez-Ariza, L., & Garc-Schez, I. M. (2015). The role of independent directors at family firms in relation to corporate social responsibility disclosures. International Business Review, 24(5), 890901.

Darmadi, S., & Sodikin, A. (2013). Information Disclosure by Family-Controlled Firm. Asia Review of Accounting, 21(3), 223240.

Ducassy, I. (2015). Corporate Social Performance, Ownrship Structure, and Corporate Governance in France. Research in International Business and Finance.

El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Wang, H., & Kwok, C. C. Y. (2016). Family control and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking and Finance, 73, 131146.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305360.

Martez-Ferrero, J., Rodruez-Ariza, L., & Garc-Schez, I. M. (2016). Corporate social responsibility as an entrenchment strategy, with a focus on the implications of family ownership. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 760770.

Mcguinness, P. B., Vieito, P., & Wang, M. (2017). CSR Performance in China: The Role of Board Gender and Foreign Ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance, 42, 7299.

Rusmanto, T., & Williams, C. (2015). Compliance Evaluation on CSR Activities Disclosure in Indonesian Publicly Listed Companies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 150156.

Samara, G., Jamali, D., Sierra, V., & Parada, M. J. (2018). Who are the best performers? The environmental social performance of family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 9(1), 3343.

Sayekti, Y. (2015). Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Company Financial Performance, and Earning Response Coefficient: Empirical Evidence On Indonesian Listed Companies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 411420.

Srinidhi, B. N., He, S., & Firth, M. (2014). The effect of governance on specialist auditor choice and audit fees in U.S. family firms. Accounting Review, 89(6), 22972329.

Waworuntu, S. R., Wantah, M. D., & Rusmanto, T. (2014). CSR and Financial Performance Analysis: Evidence from Top ASEAN Listed Companies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164(August), 493500.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Indonesian Journal Of Business And Economics