PEDAGOGICAL TEACHER COMPETENCE: USING OBSERVATION TECHNIQUES TO UNDERSTAND CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/pedagogi.v9i1.5015

Abstract

Teacher pedagogical competence is an essential component of primary school teachers. Teacher pedagogy can assist in the management of student learning and demonstrate professionalism in teaching in the classroom. This study aims to explore how teachers apply pedagogic competence to understand the characteristics of elementary school students. The research design uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive analysis of the teacher's pedagogic competence in understanding student characteristics in elementary schools. The Collecting data and analysis using structured interviews with ten primary respondents of the study. The results of the study show how teachers use direct observation techniques on the characteristics of elementary school students. Direct observation is the primary method in observing the characteristics of students, which include aspects of physical, intellectual, socio-emotional, socio-cultural, moral and spiritual, and socio-cultural background of students. The most dominant observation aspect in observing students is the socio-emotional and intellectual characteristics during learning in elementary school. This study implies that understanding student characteristics is more directed at observing aspects of whether students tend to have special needs or not and whether students experience problems with intellectual abilities.

References

Adamson, R. M., & Wachsmuth, S. T. (2014). A review of direct observation research within the past decade in the field of emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 39(4), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291303900403

Boru, T. (2018). Chapter Five Research Design And Methodology 5.1 (Issue December). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21467.62242

Buxton, C. A., Salinas, A., Mahotiere, M., Lee, O., & Secada, W. G. (2013). Leveraging cultural resources through teacher pedagogical reasoning: Elementary grade teachers analyze second language learners’ science problem solving. Teaching and Teacher Education, 32, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.01.003

Cotton, D. R. E., Stokes, A., & Cotton, P. A. (2010). Using observational methods to research the student experience. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 34(3), 463–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2010.501541

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. http://library1.nida.ac.th/termpaper6/sd/2554/19755.pdf

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Deng, Z. (2018). Pedagogical content knowledge reconceived: Bringing curriculum thinking into the conversation on teachers’ content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 72, 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.021

Department of Education and Training. (2020). HIGH IMPACT Excellence in Teaching and Learning Excellence in teaching and learning.

Development, N. I. of C. H. and H., & Network, E. C. C. R. (2000). The relation of global first-grade classroom environment to structural classroom features and teacher and student behaviors. Elementary School Journal, 102(5), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1086/499709

Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Decker, A. T., Büttner, G., Hardy, I., Klieme, E., & Kunter, M. (2019). The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102882

Gablinske, P. B. (2014). a Case Study of Student and Teacher Relationships. Open Access Dissertations. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/oa_diss

Hintze, J. M., Volpe, R. J., & Shapiro, E. S. (2002). Best Practices in the Systematic Direct Observation of Student Behavior. Best Practices in School Psychology, 4, 993–1006.

Hung, Y. H. (2020). Exploration of teachers’ personal practical knowledge for teaching controversial public issues in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Social Studies Research, 44(3), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2020.04.001

Janawi. (2019). Memahami Karakteristik peserta didik dalam proses pembelajaran. Tarbawy : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(2), 68–79. https://www.scribd.com/document/28090975/Karakteristik-Peserta-Didik-Dalam-Proses-Pembelajaran

Jordan, R. L. P., Bratsch-Hines, M., & Vernon-Feagans, L. (2018). Kindergarten and first grade teachers’ content and pedagogical content knowledge of reading and associations with teacher characteristics at rural low-wealth schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 190–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.05.002

Kjellsdotter, A. (2020). What matter(s)? A didactical analysis of primary school teachers’ ICT integration. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(6), 823–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1759144

König, J., Bremerich-Vos, A., Buchholtz, C., & Glutsch, N. (2020). General pedagogical knowledge, pedagogical adaptivity in written lesson plans, and instructional practice among preservice teachers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(6), 800–822. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1752804

Leonard, L. (2016). Kompetensi Tenaga Pendidik di Indonesia: Analisis Dampak Rendahnya Kualitas SDM Guru dan Solusi Perbaikannya. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 5(3), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v5i3.643

Lewis, T. J., Scott, T. M., Wehby, J. H., & Wills, H. P. (2014). Direct observation of teacher and student behavior, in school settings: Trends, issues and future directions. Behavioral Disorders, 39(4), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291303900404

Lindfors, M., Pettersson, F., & Olofsson, A. D. (2021). Conditions for professional digital competence: the teacher educators’ view. Education Inquiry, 00(00), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.1890936

Malik, A. (2013). Kompetensi Pedagogis Guru Dalam Konteks Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 (pp. 1–21).

Mannion, G. (2013). Place-responsive pedagogy: Learning from teachers’ experiences of excursions in nature. Environmental Education Research, 19(6), 792–809. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.749980

Maxwell, G. S. (2001). Teacher Observation in Student Assessment Prepared for the Queensland School Curriculum Council by. Assessment.

Murtadho, A. (2020). Mengembangkan Kompetensi Guru Dalam Perspektif Pedagogi Kritis (Telaah atas UU RI No. 14 tahun 2005 Tentang Guru dan Dosen serta PP RI No . 74 tentang Guru ). Al-Idarah: Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, 10(2), 135–156.

Nurhamida, I. (2018). Problematika Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Terhadap Karakteristik Peserta Didik. Jurnal Teori Dan Praksis Pembelajaran IPS, 3(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.17977/um022v3i12018p027

Rink, J. E., & Hall, T. J. (2008). Research on Effective Physical Education. The Elementary School Journal, 108(3), 207–218.

Rissanen, I., Kuusisto, E., Tuominen, M., & Tirri, K. (2019). In search of a growth mindset pedagogy: A case study of one teacher’s classroom practices in a Finnish elementary school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.10.002

Sammons, P., & Bakkum, L. (2014). Effective Teaching. In Education Development Trust. https://doi.org/10.1080/01619568409538452

Senovska, N., & Pryshliak, O. (2020). Developing professional self-regulation of students during pedagogical practice. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(4), 679–691. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i4.1147

Septianti, N., & Afiani, R. (2020). Pentingnya Memahami Karakteristik Siswa Sekolah Dasar di SDN Cikokol 2. As-Sabiqun, 2(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.36088/assabiqun.v2i1.611

Slameto, S. (2014). Permasalahan-Permasalahan Terkait Dengan Profesi Guru Sd. Scholaria : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 4(3), 1. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.scholaria.2014.v4.i3.p1-12

Smith, K. (2021). Educating teachers for the future school- the challenge of bridging between perceptions of quality teaching and policy decisions:reflections from Norway. European Journal of Teacher Education, 00(00), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1901077

Stanišić, J., & Maksić, S. (2014). Environmental education in Serbian primary schools: Challenges and changes in curriculum, pedagogy, and teacher training. Journal of Environmental Education, 45(2), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2013.829019

Stebbins, C. R. A. (2019). in the Social Sciences WHAT IS EXPLORATION ? (Issue January 2019, pp. 2–17). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412984249

Supranoto, H. (2015). Penerapan Lesson Study Dalam Meningkatkan Kompetensi Pedagogi Guru Sma Bina Mulya Gadingrejo Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016. PROMOSI (Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi), 3(2), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.24127/ja.v3i2.330

Susianna, N., & Suhandi, F. (2014). Program Lesson Study Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Pedagogi Dan Profesional Guru Paud Di Sekolah XYZ Jakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Universitas Negeri Malang, 21(1), 41–47.

Syafruddin, S. (2015). Meningkatkan Kompetensi Pedagogi Guru Melalui Lesson Study Menuju Mutu Pembelajaran Guru. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.24127/jpf.v3i2.272

Tadesse, A., Eskelä-Haapanen, S., Posti-Ahokas, H., & Lehesvuori, S. (2021). Eritrean teachers’ perceptions of learner-centred interactive pedagogy. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 28(March 2020), 100451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100451

Tynjälä, P., Virtanen, A., Klemola, U., Kostiainen, E., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2016). Developing social competence and other generic skills in teacher education: applying the model of integrative pedagogy. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3), 368–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1171314

Warren, C. A. (2018). Empathy, Teacher Dispositions, and Preparation for Culturally Responsive Pedagogy. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117712487

Published
2022-07-27
Issue
Vol 9 No 1 (2022)
Section
Articles

Ini adalah ringkasan yang dapat dibaca manusia dari (dan bukan pengganti) lisensi.  Sangkalan.

Anda bebas untuk:

  1. Bagikan — salin dan distribusikan kembali materi dalam media atau format apa pun
  2. Beradaptasi — remix, transformasi, dan membangun di atas materi
  3.  
  4. Pemberi lisensi tidak dapat mencabut kebebasan ini selama Anda mengikuti ketentuan lisensi.

Di bawah ketentuan berikut:

  1. Atribusi — Anda harus memberikan kredit yang sesuai, memberikan tautan ke lisensi, dan menunjukkan apakah perubahan telah dilakukan. Anda dapat melakukannya dengan cara apa pun yang wajar, tetapi tidak dengan cara apa pun yang menunjukkan pemberi lisensi mendukung Anda atau penggunaan Anda.
  2. NonKomersial — Anda tidak boleh menggunakan materi untuk tujuan komersial.
  3. ShareAlike — Jika Anda me-remix, mengubah, atau membangun materi, Anda harus mendistribusikan kontribusi Anda di bawah lisensi yang sama seperti aslinya.
  4. Tidak ada batasan tambahan — Anda tidak boleh menerapkan ketentuan hukum atau tindakan teknologi yang secara hukum membatasi orang lain untuk melakukan apa pun yang diizinkan oleh lisensi.

Pemberitahuan:

  1. Anda tidak harus mematuhi lisensi untuk elemen materi dalam domain publik atau di mana penggunaan Anda diizinkan oleh pengecualian atau batasan yang berlaku.
  2. Tidak ada jaminan yang diberikan. Lisensi mungkin tidak memberi Anda semua izin yang diperlukan untuk tujuan penggunaan Anda. Misalnya, hak-hak lain seperti publisitas, privasi, atau hak moral dapat membatasi cara Anda menggunakan materi tersebut.