A CRITICAL REVIEW OF INDONESIAN TRADITIONAL PROVERBS BY DERRIDA’S DECONSTRUCTION

Main Article Content

Zakaria Zakaria

Abstract

Abstrak:

This research uses qualitative case studies with Derrida's deconstruction method. The object of research is the text of traditional Indonesian proverbs. The results of the research conclude that several mythical meanings of traditional Indonesian proverb texts can be shifted by another meanings, the analysis shows that the proverb of air beriak tanda tak dalam means someone who talks a lot without knowledge can be reconstructed with meaning “a person who talks a lot is a person with knowledge so it must be present as many arguments as possible.” The proverb of buah jatuh tak jauh dari pohonnya means parents and children have the same temperament and character, can also be reconstructed with meaning “that a child can be shaped by a good or bad environment, not just by the parents.” The proverb of hujan emas di negeri orang, lebih baik di negeri sendiri can be reconstructed also with the meaning of “it would be better live in someone else's country if it can give a guarantee of prosperity”. Finally, the proverb of biar lambat asal selamat can be reconstructed by some meaning based on considerations of effectiveness and efficiency of work. Meaning will continue to move and look for new traces of meaning, therefore meaning is never single and absolute but continue to be born along with each dimension of perspective.


Article Details

How to Cite
Zakaria, Z. (2024). A CRITICAL REVIEW OF INDONESIAN TRADITIONAL PROVERBS BY DERRIDA’S DECONSTRUCTION. English Review: Journal of English Education, 12(3), 1151-1158. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v12i3.9580
Section
Articles

References

REFERENCES

Aprilia, C. & Arianto, T. (2021). Binary oppositions as the result of deconstruction analysis in the Goldfinch novel by Donna Tartt. Journal Basis, 8(1): 65-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33884/basisupb.v8i1.2812

Assyakurrohim, D. (et al. 2023). Metode studi kasus dalam penelitian kualitatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Komputer 3(1): 1-9. DOI: 10.47709/jpsk.v3i01.1951

Del, H.Z., Bassak, H., Hesar, J.M.G. (2021). A study of socio-cultural elements in common proverbs in Khorasan Razavi with emphasis on Kashmar city. RevistasUsil, 9(3): 1-8 https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2021.v9nSPE3.1099

Dewi, N.A. (2022). Perbandingan metafora dalam bahasa jerman dan indonesia: Kajian semiotika Peirce. Repositori Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: 1-9 http://repository.upi.edu/34335/4/T_ JEP_1502969_Chapter1.pdf

Didipu, H. (2021). Kritik Sastra: Tinjauan Teori dan Contoh Implementasi. Zahir Publishing. Yogyakarta.

Hou, R. (2021). A study of sense and sensibility from the perspective of schema theory. Scientific and Social Research, 3(5): 179-182.
DOI 10.36922/ssr.v3i5.1248

Hasanah, M. & Adawiyah, R. (2021). Diferensiasi konsep perempuan tiga zaman: kajian dekonstruksi jacques derrida. Litera: Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajaran, 20(1): 1-28. 10.21831/ltr.v20i1.39036

Iser, W. (1978). Tha Act of Reading, A Theory of Aesthetic Response. USA. The John Hopkins University Press.

Jura, D. & Rambitan, S.R. (2023). Signifikansi kritik teks dalam kajian studi biblika. Jurnal Kadesi, 5(2): 63-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54765/ejurnalkade si.v5i2.68

Juniati, S. (2021). Analisis struktur fungsional peribahasa karya Eka Murti Sari. CENDEKIA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 9(1): 41-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33659/cip.v9i1.188

Kurniawati, F. & Annabil, M.N. (2022). Love and sprirituality: The analysis of the novel Layla by Canra Malik based on Jacques Derrida Perspective. Poetika: Jurnal Ilmu Sastra, 10(1): 40-49. https://doi.org/10.22146/poetika.v10i 1.65981

Kinanti, K.P. & Rachman, A.K. (2019). Metafora tumbuhan dalam peribahasa Indonesia (kajian kognitif). Jurnal Belajar Bahasa: Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 4(1): 52-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32528/bb.v4i1.1867

Kunjanman, S. & Aziz, A.A. (2021). Reader-response theory: a systematic literature review. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(4): 252-260). DOI: https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i4. 747

Lee, T.E.M & Gopal, R. (2023). Reared response journals in the analysis of literary works among undergraduate students. English Educational Journal, 14(1): 548-565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/eej.v14i1.30 968

Manshur, F.M. (2019). Kajian teori formalisme dan strukturalisme. Sasdaya: Gadjah Mada Journal of Humanities, 3(1): 79-93. DOI: 10.22146/sasdayajournal.43888

Mart, C.T. (2019). Reader-response theory and literature discussions: a springboard for exploring literary texts. The New Educational Review, 78-87. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.19.56.2. 06

Martono. (2019). Kajian kritis hermeneutika friederich scheiermacher vs paul ricoeur. urnal Edukasi Khatulistiwa: Pembelajaran Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 2(1): 42-47. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/ekha.v1i1. 31713

Ndraha, L. D. M. (2021). Metaphore in proverb expressd in orahua of wedding. Jurnal Education and Development, 9(2): 636-641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v9i2

Nugraha, F. I., Saraswati, E, Widodo, J. (2020). Dekonstruksi Jackques Derrida dalam novel O karya Eka Kurniawan. Fenomena: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 13(1): 27-42. https://doi.org/10.25139/fn.v3i1.2394

Puspitaningsih, L. & Xiaoyan, J. (2022). Profil pelajar pancasila dalam peribahasa Indonesia yang mengandung unsur makanan dan cita rasanya. Arif: Jurnal Sastra dan Kearifan Lokal, 1(2): 282-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/Arif.012.07

Ronidin. (2015). Pembacaan Dekonstruksi cerpen zina karya putu wijaya. Puitika, 11(1): 36-51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25077/puitika.11. 1.36--51.2015

Saragih, E.L. L. & Mulyadi. (2020). Cognitive semantics analysis of animal proverbs. RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 13(2): 217–224 10.26858/retorika.v13i2.12008

Siarta, Hermawan & Suartini. (2020). Analisis peribahasa jepang yang mengandung unsur inu (anjing). Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Jepang, 6(1): 83-91. DOI:https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbj.v 6i1.23674

Singh, R. & Pratima. (2022). Jauss’theory of reception: a critical view. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S6), 2151–2162. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.10261

Spirovska, E. (2019). Reader-response theory and approach: application, values and significance for students in literature courses. The Journal of South East European University, 14(1): 20-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2019-0003

Stougaard-Nielsen, J. (2019). The Author in Literary Theory and Theories of Literature. The Cambridge handbook of Literary Authorship (Eds.): 270-287. U.K. Cambridge University Press

Sunarni, N. (2017). Efektifitas “pewarisan peribahasa” melalui pendidikan masyarakat sebagai media pembentuk karakter bangsa Indonesia di era global. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia dalam Konteks Global. FKIP e-Jurnal (JurnalUNEJ). Universitas Jember: 405-414
https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/fkip-epro/article/view/4912

Varghese, C. & Kumar, S.S. (2022). Marginality: a critical review of the concept. Sage Journals, Review of Development and Change, 27(1): 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/09722661221 096681

Yang, J. (2023). The use of schema theory in the teaching of reading comprehension. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 4(1): 59-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/jeer.v4i1.10032

Zakaria, Hasyim, Tunreng. (2022). The myth of metaphor symbols in speech I Have A Dream. English Review: Journal of English Education, 10(3): 1035-1044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v10i3.6702