THE PORTRAIT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE SUBJECT IN AN INDONESIAN PRIVATE HIGHER EDUCATION OF COMPUTER SCIENCE (HECS)

Deuis Sugaryamah

Abstract


Abstract: At the tertiary level in Indonesia, English language subject is mandatory as a general education course, especially for those non English programs/ departments. How this subject be positioned in an Indonesian Private Higher Education of Computer Science (HECS)’ curriculum, that later breeds the representation of the subjects on its teaching materials and its teaching and learning process by the teacher, and the students’s perceptions on such implementation of English subjects in the classroom become the concerns of this study. Qualitative research by using interviews, questionnaires and documents were used to collect the data. From the study, it was found that in this institution English is considered as an English for Speciï¬c Purposes(ESP), though regarded as a minor subject, yet itsexistence is considered as important. This perception is acceptable by all stakeholder (the institution, the lecturer and the students).

Keywords: English, Higher Education of Computer Science, English for Speciï¬c Purposes


Full Text:

PDF

References


Anthony, L. (1997). English for specific purposes: what does it mean? why is it different? On-CUE Journal, 5(3), 9-10.

Alwasilah, A. C. (2000). Perspektif pendidikan bahasa Inggris di Indonesia dalam konteks persaingan global. Bandung: CV Andira.

Brant, C. (2009). The case for reflexivity in developing ESL students’ academic communication skills. International Journal of Arts and Sciences 3(5): 1 – 18.

Brown, J. D. (1995). Theelements of language curriculum: asystematic approach to program development. USA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers

Corbetta, P. (2003). Social research theory, methods and techniques. London: SAGE Publications.

Diamond, R. M. (2008). Designing and assessing courses and curricul: Apractical guide, 3rd ed. CA: Josses-Bass.

Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative Research,2nd ed.. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Education.

Harry F. & T. Burhanudin. (2008). The future of schooling in Indonesia.Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 11(1), 71-84.

Harrabi, A. (2010). Issues in education of English for specific purposes in the Tunisian higher education. ESP World, 2(28), Retrieved from http://www.esp-world.info.

Kusni. (2007). Reformulasi perancangan program ESP di perguruan tinggi. Linguistik Indonesia, 25(1).

Marjito. (2007). An analysis of syllabus and material and their relevance to the students’ needs: acase study of a higher education of computer science. Unpublished thesis, Indonesian University of Education.

Marwan, A. (2009). ESP teaching challenges in an Indonesian vocational higher institution.The English Teacher, XXXVIII: 1 – 12.

Ornstein, A. C. & Hunkins, F. P. (2009). Curriculum: foundations, principles, and issues, 5th ed. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Posner, G. J. (1992). Analyzing the curriculum. USA: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

Strevens, P. (1988). ESP after twenty years: A re-appraisal. In M. Tickoo (Ed.), ESP: State of the art (pp. 1-13). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language

Young, M. S. (2011). A Case of the global – local dialectic: decentralization and teacher training in Banten, Indonesia. Unpublished dissertation. The Florida State University.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)