EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS (CDA) ON ENHANCING 21ST CENTURY TEACHERS’ CRITICAL READING ABILITIES

Cut Purnama Sari, Anang Santoso, Roekhan Roekhan, Gatut Susanto

Abstract


This research aims to investigate the relationship between critical reading abilities and critical discourse analysis (CDA) competencies among future 21st century educators, emphasizing the critical necessity for these educators to possess such skills in today's demanding educational landscape. A sample of 70 prospective teachers was analyzed to determine the interconnection between their abilities in critical reading abilities and CDA, with an exploration into how one skill may influence the other. Additionally, the study examines the role of cognitive style—specifically, field-independent and field-dependent thinking—as a moderating factor in this relationship. Findings indicate a significant positive impact of CDA capabilities on critical reading abilities, suggesting that proficiency in analyzing discourse critically enhances one's ability to read with a critical eye. Furthermore, the study reveals no significant difference in CDA and critical reading abilities between participants categorized as field-independent thinkers versus those identified as field-dependent thinkers. These outcomes highlight the need for further research to explore additional factors that may affect the development of critical reading and discourse analysis skills. The study concludes with a call for educational strategies that integrate both critical reading and CDA competencies, considering the varied cognitive styles of learners.

 


Keywords


Critical Reading; Critical Discourse Analysis; 21st Century Education; Cognitive Style; Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Thinking

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abd Rahman, N. F., Mohd Yusof, K., Phang, F. A., Azizan, M. T., Mohd Addi, M., Sadikin, A. N., Tengku Malim Busu, T. N. Z., & Nawi, N. D. (2020). Developing rigor with Critical Discourse Analysis to examine educators’ transition toward active learning. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2020.05.007

Akın, F., Koray, Ö., & Tavukçu, K. (2015). How Effective is Critical Reading in the Understanding of Scientific Texts? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2444–2451. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.01.915

Albeckay, E. M. (2014). Developing Reading Skills through Critical Reading Programme amongst Undergraduate EFL Students in Libya. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.01.1412

Anmarkrud, Ø., Bråten, I., Florit, E., & Mason, L. (2022). The Role of Individual Differences in Sourcing: a Systematic Review. In Educational Psychology Review (Vol. 34, Issue 2, pp.

–792). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09640-7

Bråten, I., & Braasch, J. L. G. (2017). Key issues in research on students’ critical reading and learning in the 21st century information society. In Improving Reading and Reading Engagement in the 21st Century: International Research and Innovation (pp. 77–98). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4331-4_4

Danaye Tous, M., Tahriri, A., & Haghighi, S. (2015). The effect of instructing critical thinking through debate on the EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 21–40. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v15i4.13191

Din, M. (2020). Evaluating university students’ critical thinking ability as reflected in their critical reading skill: A study at bachelor level in Pakistan. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100627. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2020.100627

Gu, X., & Catalano, T. (2022). Representing transition experiences: A multimodal critical discourse analysis of young immigrants in children’s literature. Linguistics and Education, 71, 101083. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LINGED.2022.101083

Hajare, A., Meena Surve, S., & Patankar, P. (2016). Developing Critical reading skills for Active Citizenship through Constructivist Approach. In P. P. Tandale (Ed.), Interdisciplinary National Conference on Researches and Experiments in Constructivist Pedagogy (pp. 46–50). www.aiirjournal.com

Karadağ, R. (2014). Primary School Teacher Candidates’ Views towards Critical reading skills and Perceptions of their Competence. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 889–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.09.339

Salkind, N. J. (2010). Encuclopedia of Research Design. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. Elearnspace.Org.

Sulzer, M. A. (2022). Silence as absence, silence as presence: A discourse analysis of English language arts teachers’ descriptions of classroom silences. Linguistics and Education, 68, 100961. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LINGED.2021.100961

Tsai, M. J., Wu, A. H., Bråten, I., & Wang, C. Y. (2022). What do critical reading strategies look like? Eye-tracking and lag sequential analysis reveal attention to data and reasoning when reading conflicting information. Computers & Education, 187, 104544. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2022.104544

Van, L. H., Li, C. S., & Wan, R. (2022). Critical reading in higher education: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44.

Wilson, K. (2016). Critical reading, critical thinking: Delicate scaffolding in English for Academic Purposes (EAP). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2016.10.002

Yuill, C., Harkness, M., Wallace, C., McCourt, C., Cheyne, H., & Litosseliti, L. (2022). Inducing labour in the United Kingdom: A feminist critical discourse analysis of policy and guidance. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, 2, 100108. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSMQR.2022.100108




DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v12i1.9125

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 English Review: Journal of English Education