Improving students’ ability to analyze discourse through the moodle-based blended learning method
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Covid-19 pandemic period requires online learning in Discourse Analysis Courses that are not bound by place and time by providing interactive activities and supported by complete teaching materials. The learning method is the Moodle-based Blended Learning method. This study aims to describe the results of increasing the ability to analyze discourse through the moodle-based blended learning method in the Master Program of Indonesia Language Education, University of Bengkulu. The research method used is a classroom action research method with the model of Kemmis, McTaggart, & Nixon. Data collection techniques used are tests, observation, interviews, and documentation. The data analysis technique used qualitative data analysis and quantitative data analysis and the determination of the indicators for the success of the action. Test the validity of the data used triangulation of data sources and member check. The results showed an increase in activeness, motivation, independence, and student learning outcomes, especially in analyzing discourse after the application of the moodle-based blended learning method. Increasing active, motivated students and the emergence of independence through synchronous activities used Zoom Cloud Meeting and asynchronous activities through Moodle on the website https://elearning.unib.ac.id/ and assisted by Whatsapp. The increase was seen in learning outcomes in analyzing discourse, especially the ability to analyze the description, interpretation, and explanation of cycle 1 with an average value of 77.3 with the criteria B + increased in cycle 2 of 80.75 with criteria A-.
Article Details
How to Cite
Noermanzah, N., & Suryadi, S. (2020). Improving students’ ability to analyze discourse through the moodle-based blended learning method. English Review: Journal of English Education, 9(1), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v9i1.3781
Issue
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Abdullah, W. (2018). Model blended learning dalam meningkatkan efektifitas pembelajaran. FIKROTUNA, 7(1), 855–866. doi:10.32806/jf.v7i1.3169
Adila, I., Weda, W. & Tamitiadini, D., (2019). Pengembangan model literasi dan informasi berbasis pancasila dalam menangkal hoaks. WACANA, Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi, 18(1). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.32509/wacana.v18i1.721
Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: a revision of bloom’s taxonomy. New York: Longman Publishing.
Atabik, A. (2019). New paradigm of contemporary hermeneutics: Analysis of religious text discourse understanding of Paul Ricoeur’s perspective. ADDIN, 13(2), 295. doi:10.21043/addin.v13i2.5906
Bariyah, S.H. & Imania, K.A.N. (2018). Implementasi blended learning berbasis moodle pada jurusan pendidikan teknologi informasi. Jurnal Petik, 4(2), pp.106–113. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.31980/jpetik.v4i2.10
Chien, C. (2019). Teaching translation with the notion of discourse analysis under different communication patterns. English Language Teaching, 12(6), 128. doi:10.5539/elt.v12n6p128
Darma, Y.A. (2009). Analisis wacana kritis. Bandung: CV Yrama Widya.
Eriyanto. (2001). Analisis wacana pengantar analisis teks media. Yogyakarta: PT. LkiS.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London and New York: Longman.
Flowerdew, J. (2017). Understanding the Hong Kong umbrella movement: A critical discourse historiographical approach. Discourse & Society, 28(5), 453–472. doi:10.1177/0957926517710991
Griffin, C. L. (2002). Creative writing as resistance and discovery in an analysis. Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 4(4), pp.413–443.
Hengst, J. A. (2020). Situating clinical practice and clinical discourse. Understanding Everyday Communicative Interactions, 137–157. doi:10.4324/9781003034537-10
Hew, K.F. & Cheung, W.S. (2014). Solving design problems: a blended learning approach based on design thinking features: Using Blended Learning, pp.41–58. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-089-6_3
Hosnan, M. (2014). Pendekatan saintifik dan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran abad 21. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Huda, M., (2018). Blended learning: improvisasi dalam pembelajaran menulis pengalaman (blended learning: improvisation in experience writing learning). Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya, 8(2), p.117. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.26714/lensa.8.2.2018.117-130
Ilișanu, G., & Andrei, V. (2019). Discourse analysis of health risk perceptions: Understanding public debates on childhood vaccination. Sociologie Romaneasca, 17(1), 92–113. doi:10.33788/sr.17.5
Irawan, R. & Surjono, H.D. (2018). Pengembangan E-learning berbasis moodle dalam peningkatkan pemahaman lagu pada pembelajaran bahasa Inggris. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 5(1), pp.1–11. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v5i1.10599
Jorgensen, M. & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Jorgensen, M. & Phillips, L. (2007). Analisis wacana: teori & metode. Translator by Imam Suyitno, Lilik Suyitno, dan Suwarna. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Karto, Suhartono, Susetyo, Noermanzah, Maisarah, I. (2019). The differences ability in writing descriptive texts by using chain writing and conventional methods. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(10), 2718.
Kaur, M. (2013). Blended learning - its challenges and future. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 93, pp. 612–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.248
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R. & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner. New York: Springer. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
Luo, S. (2018). Understanding an intimate partner violence victim’s online posts using discourse analysis. Journal of Comprehensive Nursing Research and Care, 3(1). doi:10.33790/jcnrc1100126
Norrick, N.R. (2001). Discourse and semantics. In The handbook of discourse analysis. Edited by Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., and Heidi E. Hamilton. USA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
Piergiovanni, P.R. (2018). Blended learning: Blended learning in engineering education, 15–34. doi:10.1201/9781315165486-2
Rasmitadila, R. Yahya, W., Humaira, M. A., & Tambunan, A. R. S. (2020). Using Blended Learning Approach (BLA) in inclusive education course: a study investigating teacher students’ perception. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(2), p.72. Available at:http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i02.9285
Renner, J. (2019). Discourse analysis for Chinese language teaching. The routledge handbook of chinese discourse analysis, 628–642. doi:10.4324/9781315213705-43
Samsudin, M. & Januhari, N.N.U. (2019). Pengembangan pembelajaran e-learning dengan moodle (modulator object-oriented dynamic learning environment). Jurnal Sistem dan Informatika (JSI), 14(1), p.4. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.30864/jsi.v14i1.210
Schiffrin, D. (2007). Ancangan kajian wacana. Translator by Unang dkk., editor, Abd. Syukur Ibrahim. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Siekmann, J., (2014). Computational logic. Handbook of the history of logic, pp.15–16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-51624-4.50001-0
Suryoputro, G., Riadi, S., & Sya’ban, A. (2012). Menulis artikel untuk jurnal ilmiah. Jakarta Selatan: Uhamka Press.
Syahputra, B.P., (2020). Implementasi pendekatan saintifik untuk meningkatkan prestasi siswa dalam menulis cerita pendek. Asas: Jurnal Sastra, 9(1), 2-3, Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.24114/ajs.v9i1.18328
Wang, Y. (2020). Understanding congressional coalitions: A discourse network analysis of congressional hearings for the every student succeeds act. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28(1), 119. doi:10.14507/epaa.28.4451
Adila, I., Weda, W. & Tamitiadini, D., (2019). Pengembangan model literasi dan informasi berbasis pancasila dalam menangkal hoaks. WACANA, Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi, 18(1). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.32509/wacana.v18i1.721
Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: a revision of bloom’s taxonomy. New York: Longman Publishing.
Atabik, A. (2019). New paradigm of contemporary hermeneutics: Analysis of religious text discourse understanding of Paul Ricoeur’s perspective. ADDIN, 13(2), 295. doi:10.21043/addin.v13i2.5906
Bariyah, S.H. & Imania, K.A.N. (2018). Implementasi blended learning berbasis moodle pada jurusan pendidikan teknologi informasi. Jurnal Petik, 4(2), pp.106–113. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.31980/jpetik.v4i2.10
Chien, C. (2019). Teaching translation with the notion of discourse analysis under different communication patterns. English Language Teaching, 12(6), 128. doi:10.5539/elt.v12n6p128
Darma, Y.A. (2009). Analisis wacana kritis. Bandung: CV Yrama Widya.
Eriyanto. (2001). Analisis wacana pengantar analisis teks media. Yogyakarta: PT. LkiS.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London and New York: Longman.
Flowerdew, J. (2017). Understanding the Hong Kong umbrella movement: A critical discourse historiographical approach. Discourse & Society, 28(5), 453–472. doi:10.1177/0957926517710991
Griffin, C. L. (2002). Creative writing as resistance and discovery in an analysis. Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 4(4), pp.413–443.
Hengst, J. A. (2020). Situating clinical practice and clinical discourse. Understanding Everyday Communicative Interactions, 137–157. doi:10.4324/9781003034537-10
Hew, K.F. & Cheung, W.S. (2014). Solving design problems: a blended learning approach based on design thinking features: Using Blended Learning, pp.41–58. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-089-6_3
Hosnan, M. (2014). Pendekatan saintifik dan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran abad 21. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Huda, M., (2018). Blended learning: improvisasi dalam pembelajaran menulis pengalaman (blended learning: improvisation in experience writing learning). Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya, 8(2), p.117. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.26714/lensa.8.2.2018.117-130
Ilișanu, G., & Andrei, V. (2019). Discourse analysis of health risk perceptions: Understanding public debates on childhood vaccination. Sociologie Romaneasca, 17(1), 92–113. doi:10.33788/sr.17.5
Irawan, R. & Surjono, H.D. (2018). Pengembangan E-learning berbasis moodle dalam peningkatkan pemahaman lagu pada pembelajaran bahasa Inggris. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 5(1), pp.1–11. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v5i1.10599
Jorgensen, M. & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Jorgensen, M. & Phillips, L. (2007). Analisis wacana: teori & metode. Translator by Imam Suyitno, Lilik Suyitno, dan Suwarna. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Karto, Suhartono, Susetyo, Noermanzah, Maisarah, I. (2019). The differences ability in writing descriptive texts by using chain writing and conventional methods. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(10), 2718.
Kaur, M. (2013). Blended learning - its challenges and future. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 93, pp. 612–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.248
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R. & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner. New York: Springer. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
Luo, S. (2018). Understanding an intimate partner violence victim’s online posts using discourse analysis. Journal of Comprehensive Nursing Research and Care, 3(1). doi:10.33790/jcnrc1100126
Norrick, N.R. (2001). Discourse and semantics. In The handbook of discourse analysis. Edited by Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., and Heidi E. Hamilton. USA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
Piergiovanni, P.R. (2018). Blended learning: Blended learning in engineering education, 15–34. doi:10.1201/9781315165486-2
Rasmitadila, R. Yahya, W., Humaira, M. A., & Tambunan, A. R. S. (2020). Using Blended Learning Approach (BLA) in inclusive education course: a study investigating teacher students’ perception. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(2), p.72. Available at:http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i02.9285
Renner, J. (2019). Discourse analysis for Chinese language teaching. The routledge handbook of chinese discourse analysis, 628–642. doi:10.4324/9781315213705-43
Samsudin, M. & Januhari, N.N.U. (2019). Pengembangan pembelajaran e-learning dengan moodle (modulator object-oriented dynamic learning environment). Jurnal Sistem dan Informatika (JSI), 14(1), p.4. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.30864/jsi.v14i1.210
Schiffrin, D. (2007). Ancangan kajian wacana. Translator by Unang dkk., editor, Abd. Syukur Ibrahim. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Siekmann, J., (2014). Computational logic. Handbook of the history of logic, pp.15–16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-51624-4.50001-0
Suryoputro, G., Riadi, S., & Sya’ban, A. (2012). Menulis artikel untuk jurnal ilmiah. Jakarta Selatan: Uhamka Press.
Syahputra, B.P., (2020). Implementasi pendekatan saintifik untuk meningkatkan prestasi siswa dalam menulis cerita pendek. Asas: Jurnal Sastra, 9(1), 2-3, Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.24114/ajs.v9i1.18328
Wang, Y. (2020). Understanding congressional coalitions: A discourse network analysis of congressional hearings for the every student succeeds act. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28(1), 119. doi:10.14507/epaa.28.4451