IDENTIFICATION OF GENDER DIFFERENCES IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS’ METACOGNITIVE KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANLINESS

  • Purnama Dewi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Riau
  • Eddy Noviana Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Riau
  • M. Jaya Adi Putra Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Riau
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/ijete.v1i2.3377

Abstract

This study aims to determine students’ metacognitive knowledge about the cleanliness of the school environment in class V elementary school 130 Pekanbaru. The category of students’ metacognitive knowledge reviewed in this study is very low, low, medium, high, and very high categories. This research was conducted to 94 fifth grade students of Sekolah Dasar 130 Pekanbaru. The instrument used to collect data was a metacognitive knowledge test about the cleanliness of the school environment consisting of 12 essay questions. Data analysis used quantitative descriptive methods. The results showed that students’ metacognitive knowledge about the cleanliness of the school environment in class V elementary school 130 Pekanbaru showed a medium category with an average value of 58,8. Based on the result of the analysis, it was also found that there was a gender difference that female students were superior to male students, where the students’ metacognitive knowledge about the cleanliness of the school environment was very low and in the low category was dominated by male students.

Keywords: metacognitive knowledge; cleanlines of the school environment; quantitative descriptive.

References

Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktek. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Atkins, W. D. (2009). The role of metacognitif in teaching reading comprehension to primary students. New York: Psycology Press.

Dyah Viji, F. H. (2017). Pengetahuan metakognitif belajar siswa kelas V SD. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 2(2), 280-284.

Eggen, P. D., & Kauchak. (1996). Strategy for teacher: teaching content and thinking skills. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Nyayu, K. (2011). Psikologi pendidikan. Palembang: Grafika Telindo Press.

Ormrod, J. E. (2008). Psikologi pendidikan membantu siswa tumbuh dan berkembang. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Pambudiono, dkk. (2012). Perbedaan Kemampuan Berfikir dan Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 7 Malang Berdasarkan Gender dengan Penerapan Strategi Jigsaw. Conference: Seminar Nasional Biologi/IPA dan Pembelajarannya: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Prawiradilaga, D. S. (2012). Prinsip Disain Pembelajaran (Instructional Design Principles). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Sadulloh, U. (2010). Pedagogik (ilmu mendidik). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Syamsudin, D. D. (2011). Metode penelitian pendidikan bahasa. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Published
2020-11-23
Issue
Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020)
Section
Articles

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).