Nuansa Informatika Teknologi Informasi Fakultas Ilmu Komputer

PEER REVIEW PROCESS

Review Policy

All texts sent through OJS Nunasa Informatika, will then be read by the editorial board and then evaluated by the editor. Manuscripts that do not fit the journal criteria will be rejected directly by the editor and the manuscript that is considered potentially also interesting to the reader will be sent to the reviewers (reviewers) to see the content, suitability, systematic writing, and language.

The review process uses a double blind review system which requires that the writer and reviewer do not know each other. The editors then make decisions based on the reviewer's recommendations of several possibilities: rejected, require major revisions, minor revisions, or accepted.

Review Guidelines

Nunasa Informatika: Journal of Information and Technology FKOM UNIKU highly appreciates their kind support by agreeing to review an article for our journal. Before they consent to evaluate any paper, the reviewers are requested to consider a number of points. First, if the paper is not in your area of research interest and expertise, please inform the editor and feel free to refuse to review it. Second, if you have no free time to evaluate the paper before the deadline, kindly inform the editor. Third, in case of any conflicts of interest, the reviewer's acknowledgement can be very useful in our final decision. Therefore, if by any chance you have read the paper before or happen to know the authors, please inform the editor about this.

Kindly make sure you review the paper confidentially. Please avoid contacting the authors. In addition, should you feel the need to ask a third party for their comments, please make sure to inform the managing editor in advance.

Before they are sent to reviewers, all Nunasa Informatika: Journal of Information and Technology papers are previewed by our editor(s)-in-chief. The papers are also checked for their originality using the turn-it-in software. However to our experience, there have been cases of plagiarism which the software has failed to detect. If you doubt the originality of any part(s) of the work you are reviewing, please inform the editor. In addition, if you suspect the accuracy or truth of any part(s) of the work under review, make sure to inform the editor about it.

Nunasa Informatika: Journal of Information and Technology reviewers are requested to evaluate the articles based on a number of evaluative criteria available in the review from including the clarity, quality, thoroughness, relevance, significance, and soundness of the works. Reviewers are expexted to leave comments in the manuscript itself and in the review form. These comments are very valuable for the professional development of any authors and will definitely help them improve their work.

Reviewers may also add their comments in the second section of the Review Form. Having reviewed the paper, the reviewer is requested to make any of the following decisions:

  • Accept as it is
  • Accept with minor revisions
  • Revise and resubmit
  • Reject

This decision should be based on the merits and demerits of the work under review.

Nunasa Informatika: Journal of Information and Technology  papers are proof read before they are published, and the reviewers are by no means obliged to correct or mark language errors or typos. However, if the reviewers detect such cases, they are most welcome to highlight them.

Nunasa Informatika: Journal of Information and Technology  corresponds with its reviewers only through email; therefore, you are requested to email your report and in-text comments to the managing editor.

Disclaimer

Nunasa Informatika: Journal of Information and Technology  Managing Editor is not involved in editorials decisions.