SEMANTIC REVIEW ON THE REFORMULATION AS THE FORM OF CLARIFICATION IN APPOSITIONAL CONSTRUCTIONS

  • Hero Gunawan English department faculty of humanities Widyatama University Bandung West Java Indonesia
  • Puspita Sari English department faculty of humanities Widyatama University Bandung West Java Indonesia
Keywords: appositives, clarification, coreference, reformulation, semantic equivalence.

Abstract

This research-based article discusses appositives containing reformulation which is very important in the context of meaning particularly in the form of clarification to the anchor as the antecedent. This reformulation is viewed from the two aspects, i.e., semantic equivalence and coreference. Therefore, this research serves two aims: 1) to elucidate the forms of clarification provided by reformulation as semantic equivalence that makes anchors more comprehensible, and 2) to elaborate whether reformulation and its anchor are coreferential in the appositional constructions. The data sources are taken from English printed media within three levels of distributional coverage, i.e., national, regional and international coverage. The data are analysed through employing the method of qualitative research, that is, the method presenting descriptive data, both written and oral data. To analyse such descriptive data, the distributional method of analysis with the two techniques is used, namely, extracting techniques, and inserting techniques. The results of this research uncover that 1) the forms of clarification provided by the reformulation cover: a) metaphorical expression, b) factual knowledge, c) expression of revision, d) simplified expression, e) short forms (acronyms), f) emphasis through negative reformulation, and g) equivalence in other language; and 1) not all reformulations have coreferences. All of the reformulation forms are given to make the anchor more comprehensible.

References

Alipour, M. (2019). A corpus-based study of reformulation markers: The case of native versus non-native research articles. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 6(2), 129-148.

Alsayed, F. K. (2019). The effects of semantics in the language development of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. International Journal of Learning and Development, 9(4), 138-153.

Al-Sulaimaa, M. M. D., & Khoshaba, L. M. (2018). Context as a basis for understanding pragmatic ambiguity with reference to Arabic. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences (IJELS), 3(5), 768-775.

Alwasilah, A. W., & Mahdi, S. (2020). Syntactic and semantic analysis on Nadia Murad’s nobel lecture. Linguistik: Jurnal Bahasa & Sastra, 5(1), 80-88.

Chotimah, Y., Mujiyanto, J., & Hartono, R. (2022). Newmark’s translation techniques and degree semantic equivalence of figurative language in Five Feet Apart novel. English Education Journal, 12(2), 215-224.

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative & Mixed methods approach. SAGE publications, Inc.

Fajrah, N. Y. (2018). Improving students’ vocabulary through semantic field of eighth year students of SMP Negeri 9 Parepare [Unpublished thesis]. IAIN Parepare.

Feist, J. (2022). Significance in language. Routledge.

Florea, S. (2019). Reformulation markers in doctoral research. Bucureşti, 66(4), 345-361.

Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative action. Cambridge University Press.

Gunawan, H. (2020). Multiappositives as the Bonus Information for Their Anchor. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt / Egyptology, 17(10), 3278-3289.

Gunawan, H. (2021). Semantic equivalence in English appositives. Unika Atma Jaya, 19, 167-172.

Gunawan, H., & Sari, P. (2019). Sense relations in restrictive appositives. Universal Journal of Educational Research 7(4A), 27-34.

Hasanah, U., Hartanto, B. P., Yulianti, M., & Faruqi, S. H. (2020). Synonym measurement through semantic similarity using the SOC-PMI method. Telematika, 13(1), 1-10.

Haverkamp, N., & Hoeltje, M. (2021). Semantic theories, linguistic essences, and knowledge of meaning. Synthese, 199(2021), 14459–14490

Jiménez, S. S. (2022). Measuring reformulation through eye-tracking: The role of reformulation markers inestablishing reformulation, an experimental approach. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 91, 205-218.

Johnson, J. G. (2019). Reformulation and its markers: A study of classification, semantic relation, and function [Unpublished Thesis]. The University of Georgia.

Lavinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.

Kroll, M., & Rysling, A. (2019). The search for truth: Appositives weigh in. Proceedings of SALT, 29, 1-21.

Kunitz, S., & Majlesi, A. R. (2022). Multimodal gestalts in reformulating practices in language cafés. Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies Of Human Sociality, 5(1), 1-28

Majlesi, A. R. (2018). Instructed vision: Navigating grammatical rules by using landmarks for linguistic structures in corrective feedback sequences. The Modern Language Journal, 102, (Supplement 2018), 11–29.

Meurant, L., Sinte, A., Gabarró-López, S. (2022). A multimodal approach to reformulation: Contrastive study of French and French Belgian sign language through the productions of speakers, signers and interpreters. Languages in Contrast, 22(2), 322–360.

Mutiara, R. (2019). Modification of English complex noun phrases: A case study of native and nonnative writers. English Studies on Translation, Culture, Literature, and Linguistics, 2(1), 17-29.

Nadal, L. (2020). Lingüística experimental y contraargumentación: Un estudio sobre el conector “sin embargo” del español. Peter Lang.

Octaberlina, L. R., Anggarini, I. F., Negeri, I., Malik, M., & Malang, I. (2020). Teaching vocabulary through picture cards in Islamic elementary school a case study in Nida Suksa school, Thailand. Madrasah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Dasar, 13(1), 26–38.

Sagala, R. W., & Rezeki, T. I. (2018). Code switching in the English department proposal seminar. Budapest International and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 1(1),11-14.

Sahyoni. (2018). Corrective feedback and classroom interaction at SMA 1 Payakumbuh Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Ta’dib, 21(1), 9-20.

Šinkūnienė, J. (2019). Reformulation markers in academic discourse: A cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary study. Jezikolovje, 20(3), 531-553.

Tsedryk, A. (2019). Reformulation in L2: A new assessment and development instrument for lexical competence at an advanced level. In A. Tsedryk & C. Doe (Eds.), The description, measurement and pedagogy of words (pp.253-289). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Wongkittiporn, A. (2022). Syntactic structures and semantic classes of appositive noun phrases in fashion texts, English applied linguistics articles, and novels. VACANA School of Liberal Arts Mae Fah Luang University, 10(2), 111-131.

Zhang, S., Wang, M-C., & Balog, K. (2022). Analyzing and simulating user utterance reformulation in conversational recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR ’22) (1-11). Association for Computing Machinery.

Published
2023-02-28
How to Cite
Gunawan, H., & Sari, P. (2023). SEMANTIC REVIEW ON THE REFORMULATION AS THE FORM OF CLARIFICATION IN APPOSITIONAL CONSTRUCTIONS. English Review: Journal of English Education, 11(1), 203-210. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v11i1.7675
Section
Articles