PREPONDERANT MODALITY IN STUDENTS’ ENGAGING ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Biber, D., Johanssson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Coates, J. (1983). Semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.
Coffin, C. (2004). Arguing about how the world is or how the world should be: The role of arguments in IELTS tests. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(3), 229-246.
Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approach. London: SAGE Publication, Inc.
Devrim, D. Y. (2015). Grammatical metaphor: What do we mean? What exactly are we researching? Functional Linguistics, 2(3), 1-15.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7thed). New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Gales, T. (2015). Identifying interpersonal stance in threatening discourse: An appraisal analysis. Discourse Studies, 13(1), 27-46. doi:10.1177/146/445610387735.
Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Ngula, R. S. (2017). Epistemic modal verbs in research articles written by Ghanaian and international scholars: A corpus-based study of three disciplines. Brno Studies in English, 43(2), 1-24. doi:10.5817/BSE2017-2-1.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2000). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
He, Y., & Wang, H. (2013). A corpus-based study of epistemic modality markers in Chinese research articles. Chinese Lexical Semantics, 7717, 199–208.
Hyland, K. (1990). A genre description of the argumentative essay. RELC Journal, 21(1), 6678.
Hyland, K. (2007). Genre and second language writing. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
Janks, H. (1997). Critical discourse analysis as a research tool. Accessed on May 22nd, 2017 from www.uv.es/gimenes/Recursor/criticaldiscourse.pdf.
Khojasteh, L., & Reinders, H. (2013). How textbooks (and learners) get it wrong: A corpus study of modal auxiliary verbs. Applied Research on English Language, 2(1) 33-44.
Kong, C. K. M. (2006). Modality in appraisal in students’ essay: A study of the effect of genre-based instruction. Accessed on April 2nd, 2017 from http://hdl.handle.net/10497/495.
Long, E. (1995). Negotiating competing voices to construct claims and evidence: Urban America teenagers rivalling anti-drug literature. In P. Costello & S. Mitchel (Eds), Competing and consensual voices: The theory and practice of argument (pp. 35-49). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Martin, J. R. (1989). Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: Appraisal system in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 142-175). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. New York: Continuum.
McEnery, T., & Kifle, N. A. (2002). Epistemic modality in argumentative essays of second language writers. Accessed on June 21st, 2017 from http: www.reserachgate.net/publication/3.pdf.
Martin, J. R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., & Painter, C. (1997). Working with functional grammar. New York: Arnold.
Palmer, F. R. (2007). Mood and modality. New York: World Book Publishing Company.
Paltridge, B. (2006). Discourse analysis: An introduction. London: Continuum.
Promwinai, P. (2010). The demand of argumentative essay writing: Experiences of Thai tertiary students. Accessed on July, 20th, 2016 from http://www.ro.uow.edu.au/theses/3298.
Qun, Z. (2010). Modality and generic features in Chinese EFL writings. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(5), 40-51.
Reid, J. (1990). Responding to different topic types: A quantitative analysis from contrastive perspective. In B. Krol (Eds), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swan, M. (2006). Practical English usage. Oxford: Oxford United Press.
Torabiardakani, N., Khojasteh, L., & Shokrpour, N. (2015). Modal auxiliaries and their semantic functions used by advanced EFL learners. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 8(2), 51-60.
Voloshinov, V. N. (1995). Marxism and the philosophy of the language. Translated by L. Matejka & I. R. Titunik, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v8i1.1930
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 English Review: Journal of English Education