THE INFUSION OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS INDICATORS AND MICROLEARNING PRINCIPLES IN THE ENGLISH READING Materials for Vocational School Students: A Content Analysis

Main Article Content

Sri Sumarni
Farah Salsabila

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the critical thinking skills indicators and microlearning features integrated in the English reading materials for vocational school students in Indonesia. A content analysis was employed to examine reading materials available in the English Coursebook Work in Progress for SMA/SMK/MA Grade X published by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia 2022. The critical thinking skills analysis was meant to capture to what extend do the reading materials coverage signify to the lifelong learning, while the microlearning features investigation was meant to portray how the reading materials are presented to support self-directed learning. 8 critical thinking skills indicators proposed by Anderson and Krathwohl. (2001) were hired as the parameters in determining the integration of the critical thinking skills. Microlearning framework proposed by Allela (2021) were used to determine the reading lesson sequences, with which instructional methods associating each sequence. The results revealed that the reading materials for grade X are presented in 8 printed texts covered descriptive, recount, procedures, expository and narrative. These texts have potentially carried critical thinking skills indicators. The contexts are all pictures and instructions that have potentially presented 3 critical thinking skill indicators. The activities cover 15 comprehension activities and 4 beyond the comprehension activities; 7 Critical thinking indicators are potentially embedded in this part. The reading materials presentation, one set are clearly sequenced in the framework of microlearning covers pre-text, text, and post-text. While the other 7 sets sequenced text and post-text. The analysis indicated most of the critical thinking indicators integrated in the reading materials are under analysis and evaluation. 

Article Details

How to Cite
Sumarni, S., & Salsabila, F. (2023). THE INFUSION OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS INDICATORS AND MICROLEARNING PRINCIPLES IN THE ENGLISH READING Materials for Vocational School Students: A Content Analysis. English Review: Journal of English Education, 11(3), 699-708. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v11i3.8819
Section
Articles

References

Abkary, N. S., & Purnawarman, P. (2020). Indonesian EFL Teachers’ Challenges in Assessing Students’ Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). 509(Icollite), 482–489. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201215.076
Abu Sarah, A. M. (2021). Effectiveness of Using Micro Learning Through Web 2.0 Tools in Developing Skills of Multimedia Designing and Production Among 12th Grade Students in Palestine. Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences, 5(32), 59–43. https://doi.org/10.26389/ajsrp.b050421
Agustina, N., Mayuni, I., Iskandar, I., & Ratminingsih, N. M. (2022). Mobile Learning Application: Infusing Critical Thinking in the EFL Classroom. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(2), 724–743. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i2.23476
Allela, M. (2021). Introduction to Microlearning. Commonwealth of Learning. www.col.org
Almazova, N., Rogovaya, Y., & Gavrilova, A. (2018). Prospects of Introduction of Microlearning Into the Process of Teaching Postgraduate Students a Foreign Language. INTED2018 Proceedings, 1(March), 3175–3182. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2018.0608
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. https://www.pdfdrive.com/a-taxonomy-for-learning-teaching-and-assessing-a-revision-of-blooms-taxonomy-of-educational-objectives-d187836328.html
Angrisani, L., Arpaia, P., Bonavolonta, F., & Schiano Lo Moriello, R. (2018). Academic Fablab at University of Naples Federico II: New Research and Development Opportunities in the Fileds of IoT and Industry 4.0. 2018 Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT, MetroInd 4.0 and IoT 2018 - Proceedings, 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/METROI4.2018.8439043
ATD. (2018). Microlearning: Bite-Sized Content. ATD Press.
Ayu, D., Kartika, I., Nurkhamidah, N., & Santosa, I. (2022). Construction of EFL Learning Object Materials for Senior High School. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan (JISIP), 6(4), 2598–9944. https://doi.org/10.36312/jisip.v6i4.3691/http
de Gagne, J. C., Park, H. K., Hall, K., Woodward, A., Yamane, S., & Kim, S. S. (2019). Microlearning in health professions education: Scoping review. JMIR Medical Education, 5(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2196/13997
Demir, B., & Sonmez, G. (2021). Generation Z students’ expectations from English language instruction. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1), 683–701. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.903536
Díaz Redondo, R. P., Caeiro Rodríguez, M., López Escobar, J. J., & Fernández Vilas, A. (2021). Integrating micro-learning content in traditional e-learning platforms. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80(2), 3121–3151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09523-z
Erdiana, N., & Panjaitan, S. (2023). How is HOTS Integrated into the Indonesian High School English Textbook? Studies in English Language and Education, 10(1), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i1.26052
Fedorova, O., Shumskyi, O., Golikova, O., Kutsenko, I., Serdiuk, N., & Zahorodna, O. (2022). Microlearning in Forming the Students’ English Competencies with VR Involvement. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 13(1Sup1), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/13.1sup1/326
Fountain, S. B., & Doyle, K. E. (2012). Learning by Chunking. In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 1814–1817). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1042'
Gunawan, M. H., Rahmawati, E., Suherdi, D., & Yunandami, A. K. (2022). Fostering Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Through High-Level Questioning in Analytical Exposition Text. Indonesian EFL Journal (IEFLJ), 8(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v8i2.6437
Hesse, A., Ospina, P., Wieland, M., Yepes, F. A. L., Nguyen, B., & Heuwieser, W. (2019). Short communication: Microlearning courses are effective at increasing the feelings of confidence and accuracy in the work of dairy personnel. Journal of Dairy Science, 102(10), 9505–9511. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15927
Jahnke, I., Lee, Y. M., Pham, M., He, H., & Austin, L. (2020). Unpacking the Inherent Design Principles of Mobile Microlearning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(3), 585–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09413-w
Kossen, C., & Ooi, C. Y. (2021). Trialling micro-learning design to increase engagement in online courses. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 16(3), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-09-2021-0107
Lee, Y. M., Jahnke, I., & Austin, L. (2021). Mobile microlearning design and effects on learning efficacy and learner experience. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 885–915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09931-w
Makarova, I., Shubenkova, K., Bagateeva, A., & Pashkevich, A. (2018). Digitalization of education as a new destination of e-learning. Proceedings Elmar - International Symposium Electronics in Marine, 2018-Septe(September), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.23919/ELMAR.2018.8534662
Mateus-Nieves; Moreno, E. (2021). Use of microlearning as a strategy to teach mathematics asynchronously. International Journal of Development Research, 11(March). https://doi.org/10.37118/ijdr.21333.03.2021
Mene, N., Ali, S. U., & Syawal, A. M. (2021). Exploring Teachers’ Strategies in Teaching Reading Comprehension at MAN 1 Halut. CAKRAWALA BAHASA Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 10(2), 77–84.
Mohammad Hosseini, H., Ejtehadi, A., & Mohammad Hosseini, M. (2020). Flipping Microlearning-based EFL Classroom to Enhance Learners’ SelfRegulation. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 20, 43–59. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2020.20.03
Mohammed, G. S., Wakil, K., & Nawroly, S. S. (2018). The Effectiveness of Microlearning to Improve Students’ Learning Ability. International Journal of Educational Research Review The, 3(3), 7. https://doi.org/10.30659/e.1.1.68-75
Silva, D., Lopes, T., Sobrinho, M., & Valentim, N. (2021). Investigating Initiatives to Promote the Advancement of Education 4.0: A Systematic Mapping Study. 1(Csedu), 458–466. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010439704580466
Skalka, J., & Drlík, M. (2018). Conceptual Framework of Microlearning-Based Training Mobile Application for Improving Programming Skills (pp. 213–224). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75175-7_22
Sulistiyo, U., Wulan, R., Al Arif, T. Z. Z., Efriza, D., & Anwar, K. (2021). A critical content analysis of english textbook for senior high school students in indonesia. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(1), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i1.16778
Widiantarai, N. M. D. P. (2017). Developing E-Learning-Based English Material for Teaching the Tenth Grade Students of Light Vehicle Department at SMK N Bali Mandara. Journal of Psychology and Instructions, 1(3), 142. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpai.v1i3.12576
Winanti, Gaol, F. L., Napitupulu, T. A., Soeparno, H., & Trisetyarso, A. (2019). Learning Framework in the Industrial Age 4.0 in Higher Education. 1st 2018 Indonesian Association for Pattern Recognition International Conference, INAPR 2018 - Proceedings, 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1109/INAPR.2018.8627039