THE EFFECT OF INTRAPERSONAL DIFFERENCES AMONG DIFFERENT FACTORS OF METACOGNITIVE AWARENESS OF L2 LISTENING ON THE UNDERGRADUATE EFL BANGLADESHI LEARNERS

Azran Azmee Kafia

Abstract


Drawing on Flavell’s (1979) conception of metacognition, Vandergrift and Goh (2012) proposed a metacognitive framework for L2 listening to facilitate listening comprehension and help learners cope with listening difficulties by influencing their operations through processes of planning, monitoring, problem-solving, and evaluation. This study was executed to find if there is any intrapersonal difference among five factors of metacognitive awareness of L2 listening, and which factors are the most used by the high achievers and low achievers for their successful listening comprehension. The overall purpose of the study was to investigate i) what factors did play the role among high achievers and low achievers, and ii) what are the interpersonal differences among the factors; planning and evaluation, person knowledge, problem-solving, directed attention and mental translation, for L2 listening comprehension. To apprehend the research objectives, twelve Bangladeshi undergraduate EFL learners in the experimental group (06) and control group (06) received metacognitive instruction and traditional instruction based on product approach respectively for 5 weeks using five transactional listening texts. To gauge the changes, a pre-test, a post-test and two metacognitive awareness listening questionnaires (MALQ) were administrated. The quantitative method research embodied the notion of triangulation for this study. Using a one-way within-subjects ANOVA, the result revealed that there was a significant effect of metacognitive awareness factors on L2 listening comprehension accounted for over 65% of the total variance in the data.

Keyword: metacognitive instruction; MALQ;  metacognitive awareness


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aryadoust, V. (2015). Fitting a Mixture Rasch Model to English as a Foreign Language Listening Tests: The Role of Cognitive and Background Variables in Explaining Latent Differential Item Functioning. International Journal of Testing, 15(3), 216-238.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.

Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other more mysterious mechanisms. In I. F. (Eds.), Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding (pp. 65–116). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. London: Longman.

Ehrich, J. F. (2018). Rasch analysis of the metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire (MALQ). International Journal of Listening, 1-13.

Fahim, M. a. (2014 Special Issue). Exploring the effect of the model of metacognitive instruction on the listening performance of EFL learners. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 3(6), 3-20.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.

Flowerdew, J. &. (2005). Second language listening: Theory and practice. Cambridge: CUP.

Gardner, D. a. (1997). A study of tertiary level self-access facilities in Hong Kong. In D. a. Gardner, Evaluation of the Student Experience Project. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.

Goh, C. (2008). Metacognitive Instruction for Second Language Listening Development: Theory, Practice and Research Implications. RELC Journal, 39(2), 188-213.

Goh, C. a. (2013). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and listening performance with questionnaire data. Language Awareness, 23(3), 255-274.

Hacker, D. J. (2009). Handbook of Metacognition in Education. New York: Routledge.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (1990). Ethnic Variation in Classroom Interaction: Myth or Reality. RELC Journal, 21(2), 45-54.

Rahimi, M. a. (2012). The role of metacognitive listening strategies awareness and podcast-use readiness in using podcasts for learning English as a foreign language. Computers in Human Behaviour, 28, 1153-1161.

Vandergrift, L. a. (2012). Teaching and Learning Second Language Listening: Metacognition in Action. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

Vandergrift, L. G. (2006). The Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire: Development and Validation. Language Learning, 56, 431-462.

Wenden, A. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics, 19, 515-537.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v7i2.4947

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.