THE ROLE OF GESTURES IN SHAPING THE INTERPRETATION OF SPEECH ACTS IN COMICS
Main Article Content
Abstract
The importance of this study resides in its contribution to comprehending the complex connection between speech and gestures in influencing the interpretation of speech acts. The findings have implications for enhancing communication tactics in digital comics and other types of discourse. The successful integration of verbal and nonverbal cues is vital for transmitting meaning efficiently. Using a descriptive qualitative design, the primary data for this research consists of the conversations said by the characters in the comic. In addition, the photos depicting the gestures of each character serve as the corroborating data in this study. In order to get the data, the researcher employs the observation method, utilizing three distinct techniques: tapping, non-participatory observation, and note-taking. In addition, the researcher employs a data analysis technique specific to qualitative research in order to analyze the data. Ultimately, the interaction between verbal and nonverbal signals is crucial for comprehending the intended significance of speech acts. Gesture has a vital part in influencing the understanding of speech acts, and it is essential to take into account both verbal and nonverbal signals for successful communication
Article Details
Issue
Section
Articles
Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike (CC BY-NC-SA)
References
Afriani, S. H. (2015). An Introduction to Linguistics: A Practical Guide. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.
Aksan, N., Kisac, B., Aydin, M., & Demirbuken, S. (2009). Symbolic interaction theory. World Conference on Educational Sciences 2009, Procedia: Social and Behavioural Sciences 1, p. 902-904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.160
Boux, I. P., Margiotoudi, K., Dreyer, F. R., Tomasello, R., & Pulvermuller, F. (2023). Cognitive features of indirect speech acts. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, Vol. 38(1), p. 40-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2022.2077396
Candra, K. D. P., Simpen, I W., Sudipa, I N., & Artawa, K. (2023). Pragmatic functions of inquiry speech acts in Balinese YouTube content. The International Journal of Language and Cultural, Vol. 5(1), p. 59-66. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7898061
Carter, M. J. & Fuller, J. (2015). Symbolic interactionism. Sociopedia.isa. https://doi.org/10.1177/205684601561
Carter, M. J., & Fuller, C. (2016). Symbols, meaning, and action: The past, present, and future of symbolic interactionism. Current Sociology, 64(6), p. 931–961. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392116638396
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. New York: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.
Degen, J. (2023). The rational speech act framework. Annual Review of Linguistics, Vol. 9, p. 519-540. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031220-010811
Denzin, N. K. (2003). Symbolic interactionism and cultural studies: The politics of interpretation. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishing. Ltd. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.102/9780470698969
Fink, E. L. (2015). Symbolic interactionism. The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication, 1st Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic266
House, J. & Kadar, D. Z. (2022). Speech acts and interaction in second language
House, J. & Kadar, D. Z. (2023). An interactional approach to speech acts for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review, https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0116
McNeill, D. (1998). Speech and Gesture Integration. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219987902
Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An Introduction. London: Blackwell Publishing.
Razzakberdiyevna, U. D. (2023). The main characteristics of English pragmatics in linguistics. Proceeding of International Educators Conference, Vol 2(1). https://econferenceseries.com/index.php/iec/article/view/1372
Sudaryanto. (1992). Metode Linguistik: Ke Arah Memahami Metode Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.
Taguchi, N. (2023). Game-based instruction of pragmatics: Learning request-making through perlocutionary effects. Language Learning & Technology, 27(1), p. 1–18. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/73519
Tur, A. P. A. (2019). Iconic English Business Name as a Branding Tool in the Rural Areas of Yogyakarta Special Region. LITERA 18(1), 2019, p. 137-150. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/litera/article/view/20736
Tur, A.P.A. & Putri, S.A. (2020). Codes of teenage characters and mama in their talks portraying the sociolinguistic features. Leksika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajarannya 14 (2), 46-51. https://jurnalnasional.ump.ac.id/index.php/LEKSIKA/article/view/7638
Tur, A.P.A. & Sari, F. A. (2019). Reshaping the society face through the culture of horror told in Shirley Jackson’s the lottery. Notion: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, Vol. 1 (1), 1-7. http://www.journal2.uad.ac.id/index.php/notion/article/view/709
Tur, A.P.A., Ahdiani, U., Kurniawan, M.H., & Fadillah, D. (2023). Black Comedy Alike, How Indonesian Middle Low Citizens Communication Model Teasing about Lockdown. Studies in Media and Communication 11 (6), 50-62. https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/smcjnl/v11y2023i6p50-62.html
Wray, A, & Bloomer, A. (2013). Project in Linguistics: A Practical Guide to Researching Language. London: Routledge.
Wibowo, A.A., Puspita, I., Nugroho, A.S., Mohd Nasir, R.M.N., Probosiwi, Tur, A.P.A. (2024). Visual comparison of Rama’s and Rahwana’s characters in Javanese and Kelantanese wayang kulit. Notion: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 6(1), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v6i1.10201
Zou, L. & Wu, C. (2023). A literature review on the research of speech act theory and its application. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Translation, Vol. 6(1), p. 26-32. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0116
Aksan, N., Kisac, B., Aydin, M., & Demirbuken, S. (2009). Symbolic interaction theory. World Conference on Educational Sciences 2009, Procedia: Social and Behavioural Sciences 1, p. 902-904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.160
Boux, I. P., Margiotoudi, K., Dreyer, F. R., Tomasello, R., & Pulvermuller, F. (2023). Cognitive features of indirect speech acts. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, Vol. 38(1), p. 40-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2022.2077396
Candra, K. D. P., Simpen, I W., Sudipa, I N., & Artawa, K. (2023). Pragmatic functions of inquiry speech acts in Balinese YouTube content. The International Journal of Language and Cultural, Vol. 5(1), p. 59-66. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7898061
Carter, M. J. & Fuller, J. (2015). Symbolic interactionism. Sociopedia.isa. https://doi.org/10.1177/205684601561
Carter, M. J., & Fuller, C. (2016). Symbols, meaning, and action: The past, present, and future of symbolic interactionism. Current Sociology, 64(6), p. 931–961. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392116638396
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. New York: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.
Degen, J. (2023). The rational speech act framework. Annual Review of Linguistics, Vol. 9, p. 519-540. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031220-010811
Denzin, N. K. (2003). Symbolic interactionism and cultural studies: The politics of interpretation. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishing. Ltd. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.102/9780470698969
Fink, E. L. (2015). Symbolic interactionism. The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication, 1st Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic266
House, J. & Kadar, D. Z. (2022). Speech acts and interaction in second language
House, J. & Kadar, D. Z. (2023). An interactional approach to speech acts for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review, https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0116
McNeill, D. (1998). Speech and Gesture Integration. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219987902
Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An Introduction. London: Blackwell Publishing.
Razzakberdiyevna, U. D. (2023). The main characteristics of English pragmatics in linguistics. Proceeding of International Educators Conference, Vol 2(1). https://econferenceseries.com/index.php/iec/article/view/1372
Sudaryanto. (1992). Metode Linguistik: Ke Arah Memahami Metode Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.
Taguchi, N. (2023). Game-based instruction of pragmatics: Learning request-making through perlocutionary effects. Language Learning & Technology, 27(1), p. 1–18. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/73519
Tur, A. P. A. (2019). Iconic English Business Name as a Branding Tool in the Rural Areas of Yogyakarta Special Region. LITERA 18(1), 2019, p. 137-150. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/litera/article/view/20736
Tur, A.P.A. & Putri, S.A. (2020). Codes of teenage characters and mama in their talks portraying the sociolinguistic features. Leksika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajarannya 14 (2), 46-51. https://jurnalnasional.ump.ac.id/index.php/LEKSIKA/article/view/7638
Tur, A.P.A. & Sari, F. A. (2019). Reshaping the society face through the culture of horror told in Shirley Jackson’s the lottery. Notion: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, Vol. 1 (1), 1-7. http://www.journal2.uad.ac.id/index.php/notion/article/view/709
Tur, A.P.A., Ahdiani, U., Kurniawan, M.H., & Fadillah, D. (2023). Black Comedy Alike, How Indonesian Middle Low Citizens Communication Model Teasing about Lockdown. Studies in Media and Communication 11 (6), 50-62. https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/smcjnl/v11y2023i6p50-62.html
Wray, A, & Bloomer, A. (2013). Project in Linguistics: A Practical Guide to Researching Language. London: Routledge.
Wibowo, A.A., Puspita, I., Nugroho, A.S., Mohd Nasir, R.M.N., Probosiwi, Tur, A.P.A. (2024). Visual comparison of Rama’s and Rahwana’s characters in Javanese and Kelantanese wayang kulit. Notion: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 6(1), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v6i1.10201
Zou, L. & Wu, C. (2023). A literature review on the research of speech act theory and its application. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Translation, Vol. 6(1), p. 26-32. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0116