Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 365 Download : 181

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the increase in scientific literacy and scientific attitude of students through practicum learning with vee diagrams on ecosystem material. The method used in this research is a quasi-experimental with "static group pretest-posttest design". The research subjects were students of class VII in one of the junior high schools in Cirebon Regency. The sample is 65 students. The results showed that the implementation of practicum learning with the vee diagram was almost entirely carried out in accordance with the practicum stages. Based on the average difference test, the results showed that there was no significant (significant) difference between the average scientific literacy of students in the control class and the experimental class. The data processing techniques used are normality test, homogeneity test, and hypothesis testing (t test). Based on the results of the analysis using Kolmogorov- Smirnova that practical learning with vee diagrams can improve students' scientific literacy on ecosystem materials. The results showed that there was an increase in students' scientific literacy, especially in the aspect of competence in identifying scientific problems by 85%. In the aspect of science attitudes, practicum with vee diagrams is able to improve students' scientific attitudes on indicators of responsibility for resources and the environment. Most students expressed a positive response to the application of practicum learning with the help of vee diagrams on ecosystem material.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Asih, S. M., Hindriana, A. F., & Nur, S. H. (2023). Penerapan Metode Praktikum Berbantuan Diagram Vee Untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains dan Sikap Sains Siswa Pada Materi Ekosistem Kelas VII SMPIT Bina Ummah. Edubiologica: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Dan Pendidikan Biologi, 11(2), 58-65. https://doi.org/10.25134/edubiologica.v11i2.10282

References

  1. Adisenjaja, Yusuf Hilmi, (2014). Pelatihan Pengembangan PengetahuanTentang Hakikat Sains Dan Inkuiri Serta Mengaplikasinya Dalam Kurikulum 2013. (Modul). Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi. Bandung: FPMIPA UPI.
  2. Anjarsari, P. (2014). Literasi sains dalam kurikulum dan pembelajaran IPA SMP. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pensa VI "Peran Literasi Sains" (pp. 602-607). Surabaya: UNESA
  3. Fang, Z & Wei. 2010. Improving Middle School Student’s Literacy Through Reading Infusion. The Journal of Educational Research. 103(4): 262-273.
  4. Fraenkel, R.J, & Wallen, N.C,.(2006). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. London: Mc. Graw Hill, Inc.
  5. Hindriana, Anna F. (2016). The Development Of Biology Practicum Learning Based On Vee Diagram For Reducing Student Cognitive Load. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning. 1(2):61-65.
  6. Hindriana, Anna F. (2020). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Praktikum Berbasis Diagram Vee Guna Memfasilitasi Kegiatan Laboratorium Secara Bermakna. Jurnal Pendiddikan dan Biologi. 12(1):62-68
  7. Huann, S. L., Zuway, R. H., Tai, C., H. 2012. The Role of Emotional Factors in Building Public Scientific Literacy and Engagement with Science. International Journal of Science Education 34 (1): 25-42.
  8. Lyle, K., and Robinson, W. 2001. Teaching Science Problem Solving: An Overview of Experimental Work. Journal of Chemical Eduction. 78 (9): 1162-1165.
  9. Nadhifatuzzahro, D., Setiawan, B., Sudibyo, E. (2015). Kemampuan literasi sains siswa kelas VII-B SMP Negeri 1 Sumobito melalui pembuatan jamu tradisional. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Jurusan Fisika FMIPA UM (pp. F1- F8). Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang
  10. National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington DC. National Academy Press.
  11. OECD. 2006. Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy A Framework For PISA 2006. France: OECD Publishing.
  12. OECD. 2013. PISA 2012. Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/97892641 90511-en
  13. Passmore, G.G. 1998. Using vee diagrams to facilitate meaningful learning and misconception remediation in radiologic technologies laboratory education. Radiologic Science and Education 4(1), 11-28. Diakses lewat:http//www.aers.org/V4N1PASSMO RE.html (28 Januari 2019).
  14. Rustaman, Nuryani. Y, Soendjojo Dirdjosoemarto, Suroso Adi Yudianto, Yusnani Achmad, Ruchji Subekti, Diana Rochintaniawati, dan Mimin Nurjhani K. (2003). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Bandung: Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi FPMIPA UPI.
  15. Salamon. 2007. Scientific Literacy in Higher Education. Tamarat Teaching Professorshing: University of Calgary.
  16. Situmorang, R. P. (2016). Integrasi literasi sains peserta didik dalam pembelajaran sains. Satya Widya, 32(1), 49-56.
  17. Tatar, E. and Oktaym M. 2011. The Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning on Teaching the First Law of Thermodynamics. Research in Science and Technological Education, 29, (3): 315-332.
  18. Toharudin, U. Hendrawati, S dan Rustaman A. (2011). Membangun Literasi Peserta Didik. Bandung: Humaniora.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >>