INVESTIGATING EFL STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION AND PRACTICE OF ONLINE PEER ASSESSMENT IN THE SCHOOL CONTEXT
Abstract
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adachi, C., Hong-Meng Tai, J., & Dawson, P. (2018). Academics’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of self and peer assessment in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 294–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1339775
Bambang Sumintono., & Wahyu Widhiarso. (2013). Aplikasi model rasch : untuk penelitian ilmu-ilmu sosial. Trim Komunikata Publishing House.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cao, S., Zhou, S., Luo, Y., Wang, T., Zhou, T., & Xu, Y. (2022). A review of the ESL/EFL learners’ gains from online peer feedback on English writing. In Frontiers in Psychology (Vol. 13). Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1035803
Carvalho, A. (2013). Students’ perceptions of fairness in peer assessment: evidence from a problem-based learning course. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(5), 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.753051
Cheng, K. H., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). Examining the role of feedback messages in undergraduate students’ writing performance during an online peer assessment activity. Internet and Higher Education, 25, 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.001
Chien, S. Y., Hwang, G. J., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2020). Effects of peer assessment within the context of spherical video-based virtual reality on EFL students’ English-Speaking performance and learning perceptions. Computers and Education, 146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103751
Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control group studies. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3
Jones, I., & Wheadon, C. (2015). Peer assessment using comparative and absolute judgement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 47, 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.09.004
Kaufman, J. H., & Schunn, C. D. (2011). Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: Their origin and impact on revision work. Instructional Science, 39(3), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9133-6
Li, H., Xiong, Y., Hunter, C. V., Guo, X., & Tywoniw, R. (2020). Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1620679
Lin, G. Y. (2018). Anonymous versus identified peer assessment via a Facebook-based learning application: Effects on quality of peer feedback, perceived learning, perceived fairness, and attitude toward the system. Computers and Education, 116, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.010
Lu, J., & Law, N. (2012). Online peer assessment: Effects of cognitive and affective feedback. Instructional Science, 40(2), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9177-2
Shen, B., Bai, B., & Xue, W. (2020). The effects of peer assessment on learner autonomy: An empirical study in a Chinese college English writing class. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100821
van den Bos, A. H., & Tan, E. (2019). Effects of anonymity on online peer review in second-language writing. Computers and Education, 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103638
Wallace, M. P., & Qin, C. Y. (2021). Language classroom assessment fairness: Perceptions from students. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(1), 492–521. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/index
Wen, M. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2006). University students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment. Higher Education, 51(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6375-8
Zou, Y., Schunn, C. D., Wang, Y., & Zhang, F. (2018). Student attitudes that predict participation in peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 800–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1409872
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v10i1.9339
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.