PADLET FOR ENGLISH SPEAKING ACTIVITY: A CASE STUDY OF PROS AND CONS ON ICT
Abstract
As Millennial generation, students nowadays have limitless concept of time and space, they broke logical and physical barriers during the process of communication including in the process of learning. Blanded learning and hybrid learning are one of the latest phenomenon in Education. In shortest perception students will encoder positive effect toward the uses of technology in school but in fact some of them also encounter obstacle and problems. This research aims to project the students’ pros and cons on the use of one of ICT called PADLET during the process of speaking activity. This research uses 35 students of one private university in Cimahi, Indonesia. Qualitative method used to provide detail finding associate with supportive theories. Observation that was taken from both online processes during submitting and commenting the speaking video and offline situation were used and then strengthen by the use of open questions interview. From the data, it showed that students pros on the idea of; (1) collaboration, (2) Flexibility. (3) Autonomous Learning. While on cons students mark on; (1) technicality issue, (2) Psychological elements.
Keywords: ICT; PADLET; Pro; Cons; Speaking.Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmed, A. M., AbdelAlmuniem, A., & Almabhouh, A. (2016). The current use of Web 2.0 tools in university teaching from the perspective of faculty members at the college of education. International Journal of Instruction, 9(1), 179–194.
An, Y. J., Aworuwa, B., Ballard, G., & Williams, K. (2019). Teaching with Web 2.0 technologies: Benefits, barriers and best practices. In Proceedings of Annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology,. Louisville, KY. Retrieved from https://www.aect.org/pdf/proceedings09/2009/09_1.pdf.
Ann, D., & Zainor Izat, Z. (2018). Padlet as an educational tool: Pedagogical considerations and lessons learnt. ICTC (pp. 156-162). Tokyo : ACM Digital Library.
Assar, S. (2019). Information and communications technology (ICT). International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier, 66-71.
Bejjar, M. A., & Boujelbene, Y. (2014). E-learning and web 2.0: A couple of the 21st century advancements in higher education. Hershey: IGI Global.
Cibangu, K. S. (2012). Qualitative research: The toolkit of theories in the social Sciences. In Asunción López-Varela (Ed.), Theoretical and methodological approaches to social sciences and knowledge management. InTech, 95–126.
Ciesielska, M., Boström, K., & Öhlander, M. (2018). Observation methods. Qualitative Methodologies in Organization Studies, 31-52.
Dewiit, D., Alias, N., & Saedah., S. (2014). Interactions in online forums: A case study among first-year undergraduate students. Frontiers in Education, 2(1), 6-13.
Goh, P. S., & Sandar, J. (2016). An innovative approach to digitally flip the classroom by using an online “graffiti wall” with a blog. Medical Teacher, 858.
Haris, M., Yunus, M. M., & Badusah., J. H. (2017). The effectiveness of using padlet in ESL classroom. International Joural of Advance Research (IJAR), 783-788.
Hernandez, R. (2017). Impact of ICT. Propósitos y Representaciones, 325-347.
Kavitharaj, K. (2017). ICT to enhance speaking skills. Intenational Journal of English Language, Literature and Humanity (IJELLH), 843-847.
Little, D. (2019, 10 7). Learner autonomy and second/foreign language learning. Retrieved from: https://www.llas.ac.uk/resources/gpg/1409#ref10.
Mohajan, H. (2018). Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 23-48 .
Monica, H., & Peter, W. R. (2014). How flipped classrooms can benefit the development of students. The Kyushu Academic Society of English Language Education (KASELE).
Ratheeswari, K. (2018). Information communication technology in education. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, S45-S47.
Redecker, A. A. (2010). Learning 2.0 – The use of social computing to enhance lifelong learning. Seville, Spain: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS).
Siddiquah, A., & Salim, Z. (2017). The ICT Facilities, skills, usage, and the problems faced by the students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 4987-4994.
Stannard, R. (2015). English teaching professional. Webwatcher.
Thomas, J. D., Morin, D., & Ly, S. (2014). Delivery method and persistence and performance. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (pp. 1797–1801). Finland: Tampere.
Velagapudi, M. (2013). 18 FREE Web 2.0 tools for teachers. WizIQ, Inc.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v6i2.3383
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.