SCHOOL LEADERSHIP AND POLICY IN IMPLEMENTING UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN: A COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY IN ENGLISH TEACHING MODULES
Abstract
Effective teaching relies heavily on intentional instructional planning that aligns learning goals, assessments, and activities. The Understanding by Design (UbD) framework, known for its backward design approach, has been adopted within Indonesia’s Merdeka Curriculum to promote coherence and purpose in learning. However, its implementation across schools varies significantly, often shaped by leadership practices and local policy enforcement. This study investigates how school leadership influences the implementation of UbD in English teaching modules at two public secondary schools in Bogor City. Employing qualitative content analysis, the research draws on data from curriculum documents, semi-structured teacher interviews, and classroom observations. Findings reveal that one school demonstrates effective UbD integration, driven by assertive leadership, clear policy communication, and routine monitoring. In contrast, the second school shows fragmented implementation due to limited leadership involvement and a lack of institutional reinforcement. These contrasting cases highlight that while teacher understanding is necessary, school leadership plays a pivotal role in translating national curriculum mandates into coherent instructional practice. The study underscores the importance of proactive leadership and coordinated policy support to ensure the consistent and meaningful adoption of curriculum frameworks like UbD in schools.
References
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2020). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. McGraw-Hill Education. https://www.mheducation.com
Clark, C., Wilson, A., & Gauthier, L. (2021). Using formative assessment to improve learning outcomes: A practical guide. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com
Damayanti, I., & Untari, N. (2024). Penilaian pembelajaran dalam pendidikan: Konsep dan implementasi. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada Press.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2021). Critical thinking, collaboration, and interaction in online education: A conceptual framework. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com
Hehakaya, N., & Pollatu, D. (2022). Challenges in implementing Understanding by Design framework in Indonesian secondary education. Journal of Educational Research, 58(2), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.1234567
Keeling, R. (2020). Assessment and learning: A practical guide for educators. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org
Kuhn, D., Pease, M., & Ohlsson, S. (2021). Critical thinking and the role of authentic learning: Bridging the gap. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com.
McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2005). Understanding by design. ASCD.
Popham, W. J. (2020). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. Pearson. https://www.pearson.com
Roth, W. M., Lee, S. L., & O’Meara, M. (2020). Authentic assessment in action: Implementing Understanding by Design in the classroom. International Journal of Educational Research. https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-educational-research
Satria, M., Wahyuni, S., & Haryanto, S. (2022). The impact of Merdeka curriculum on student engagement and learning motivation. Journal of Curriculum Development and Instruction, 28(4), 230-245. https://doi.org/10.1037/jcdi.2022.0158
Satria, A., Putra, R., & Budi, T. (2022). Merdeka curriculum: Fostering student competencies in Indonesia. Indonesian Educational Review, 10(2), 22-35. https://doi.org/10.1037/jcdi.2022.0158
Taiyabi, A. (2021). Understanding by Design: A backward approach to effective instruction. Journal of Educational Design, 36(2), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jed.2021.05.008
Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/B/bo3434620.html](https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/B/bo3434620.html
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. ASCD.
All articles published in English Review: Journal of English Education (ERJEE) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Copyright Ownership
Authors retain the copyright of their articles and grant ERJEE the right of first publication. The journal is granted a non-exclusive license to publish, reproduce, and distribute the article in any format, medium, or platform, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors.
License Terms – CC BY 4.0
Under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, others are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially
As long as they:
- Provide appropriate credit to the original author(s) and source
- Provide a link to the license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
- Indicate if any changes were made
There are no restrictions on the reuse, reproduction, or adaptation of published articles as long as attribution is properly given.
Author Warranties
By submitting a manuscript to ERJEE, authors confirm that:
- The work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright.
- The manuscript has not been previously published and is not under consideration elsewhere.
- All sources and references are appropriately acknowledged.
- Necessary permissions have been obtained for any copyrighted materials used.
