AI INTEGRATION IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING: INSIGHTS INTO ESP TEACHERS’ VIEWS AND READINESS
Abstract
This study investigates ESP teachers’ perspectives on the integration of AI tools in language teaching, focusing on the benefits, negative sides, usage, readiness, and barriers they face. A qualitative approach was employed, utilizing an open-ended questionnaire distributed to 30 teachers in higher vocational institutions. The thematic analysis of their responses reveals several findings. Teachers recognize AI's potential to support personalized learning, enhance skill development, and assist in lesson planning. However, concerns about over-reliance on AI and the lack of human interaction were also highlighted. Additionally, the study identifies barriers such as inadequate training, infrastructure limitations, and ethical concerns. Teachers emphasized the need for professional development programs, including technical training, AI integration in pedagogy, and ethical guidance. Institutional support in providing access to AI resources and managing workloads is also critical. The study suggests a balanced integration of traditional methods and AI-driven approaches.References
Amaral, L. A., & Meurers, D. (2011). On using intelligent computer-assisted language learning in real-life foreign language teaching and learning. ReCALL, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344010000261
Ayedoun, E., Hayashi, Y., & Seta, K. (2019). Adding Communicative and Affective Strategies to an Embodied Conversational Agent to Enhance Second Language Learners’ Willingness to Communicate. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-018-0171-6
Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using automated written corrective feedback in the writing classrooms: effects on L2 writing accuracy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1936071
Bashori, M., van Hout, R., Strik, H., & Cucchiarini, C. (2024). ‘Look, I can speak correctly’: learning vocabulary and pronunciation through websites equipped with automatic speech recognition technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(5–6). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2080230
Bibauw, S., François, T., & Desmet, P. (2019). Discussing with a computer to practice a foreign language: research synthesis and conceptual framework of dialogue-based CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1535508
Chen, H. H. J. (2011). Developing and evaluating an oral skills training website supported by automatic speech recognition technology. ReCALL, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344010000285
Chen, H. H. J., Yang, C. T. Y., & Lai, K. K. W. (2023). Investigating college EFL learners’ perceptions toward the use of Google Assistant for foreign language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1833043
Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118
Choi, I. C. (2016). Efficacy of an ICALL tutoring system and process-oriented corrective feedback. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.960941
Chukharev-Hudilainen, E., & Saricaoglu, A. (2016). Causal discourse analyzer: improving automated feedback on academic ESL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.991795
Coniam, D. (2014). The linguistic accuracy of chatbots: Usability from an ESL perspective. In Text and Talk (Vol. 34, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0018
Cox, T. L., & Davies, R. S. (2012). Using automatic speech recognition technology with elicited oral response testing. CALICO Journal, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.4.601-618
Crosthwaite, P., & Steeples, B. (2024). Data-driven learning with younger learners: exploring corpus-assisted development of the passive voice for science writing with female secondary school students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(5–6). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2068615
Dai, Y., & Wu, Z. (2023). Mobile-assisted pronunciation learning with feedback from peers and/or automatic speech recognition: a mixed-methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(5–6). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1952272
Daniels, P., & Iwago, K. (2017). The suitability of cloudbased speech recognition engines for language learning. JALT CALL Journal, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v13n3.220
Dizon, G. (2017). Using Intelligent Personal Assistants for Second Language Learning: A Case Study of Alexa. TESOL Journal, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.353
Dizon, G. (2020). Evaluating intelligent personal assistants for L2 listening and speaking development. Language Learning and Technology, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.125/44705
Dizon, G., & Gayed, J. M. (2021). Examining The Impact Of Grammarly On The Quality Of Mobile L2 Writing. JALT CALL Journal, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.29140/JALTCALL.V17N2.336
Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2019). Mediating EFL learners’ academic writing skills in online dynamic assessment using Google Docs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5–6). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1527362
Ebadi, S., & Saeedian, A. (2015). The Effects of Computerized Dynamic Assessment on Promoting At-Risk Advanced Iranian EFL Students’ Reading Skills. Issues in Language Teaching, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.22054/ILT.2015.7224
Evers, K., & Chen, S. (2022). Effects of an automatic speech recognition system with peer feedback on pronunciation instruction for adults. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(8). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1839504
Forsyth, C. M., Luce, C., Zapata-Rivera, D., Jackson, G. T., Evanini, K., & So, Y. (2019). Evaluating English language learners’ conversations: Man vs. Machine. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1517126
Fryer, L., Coniam, D., Carpenter, R., & Lăpușneanu, D. (2020). Bots for language learning now: Current and future directions. Language Learning & Technology, 24(2).
Fryer, L. K., Ainley, M., Thompson, A., Gibson, A., & Sherlock, Z. (2017). Stimulating and sustaining interest in a language course: An experimental comparison of Chatbot and Human task partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.045
Gyawali, Y. P., & Mehandroo, M. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in English Language Teaching: Navigating the Future with Emerging Perspectives. Journal of Language and Linguistics in Society, 26. https://doi.org/10.55529/jlls.26.21.27
Hadley, G., & Charles, M. (2017). Enhancing extensive reading with data-driven learning. Language Learning and Technology, 21(3).
Hamied, F. A., & Musthafa, B. (2019). Policies on language education in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i2.20279
Han, T., & Sari, E. (2024). An investigation on the use of automated feedback in Turkish EFL students’ writing classes. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2067179
Healey, Justin. (2020). Artificial intelligence (Vol. 450). Spinney Press.
Huang, J.-X., Kwon, O.-W., Lee, K.-S., & Kim, Y.-K. (2018). Improve the chatbot performance for the DB-CALL system using a hybrid method and a domain corpus. In Future-proof CALL: language learning as exploration and encounters – short papers from EUROCALL 2018. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.26.820
Idham, A. Z., Rauf, W., & Rajab, Abd. (2024). Navigating the Transformative Impact of Artificial Intelligence on English Language Teaching: Exploring Challenges and Opportunities. Jurnal Edukasi Saintifik, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.56185/jes.v4i1.620
Kim, H. S., Kim, N. Y., & Cha, Y. (2021). Is it beneficial to use ai chatbots to improve learners’ speaking performance? Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.1.10.161
Koltovskaia, S. (2023). Postsecondary L2 writing teachers’ use and perceptions of Grammarly as a complement to their feedback. ReCALL, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344022000179
Lameras, P., & Arnab, S. (2022). Power to the Teachers: An Exploratory Review on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Information (Switzerland), 13(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/info13010014
Lee, C. (2020). A study of adolescent English learners’ cognitive engagement in writing while using an automated content feedback system. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1544152
Lee, S. M. (2021). The effectiveness of machine translation in foreign language education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1901745
Li, Z., Feng, H. H., & Saricaoglu, A. (2017). The short-term and long-term effects of AWE feedback on ESL students’ development of grammatical accuracy. CALICO Journal, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.26382
Liang, J. C., Hwang, G. J., Chen, M. R. A., & Darmawansah, D. (2023). Roles and research foci of artificial intelligence in language education: an integrated bibliographic analysis and systematic review approach. In Interactive Learning Environments (Vol. 31, Issue 7). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1958348
Link, S., Dursun, A., Karakaya, K., & Hegelheimer, V. (2014). Towards best ESL practices for implementing automated writing evaluation. CALICO Journal, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.31.3.323-344
Liu, M. (2023). Exploring the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Foreign Language Teaching: Challenges and Future Development. SHS Web of Conferences, 168. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202316803025
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An argument for AI in Education. Pearson. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299561597
Madhakomala, R., Hakim, M. A., & Syifauzzuhrah, N. (2022). Problems of education in Indonesia and alternative solutions. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v3i3.64
McCrocklin, S. (2019). Learners’ feedback regarding ASR-based dictation practice for pronunciation learning. CALICO Journal, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.34738
Mehri Kamrood, A., Davoudi, M., Ghaniabadi, S., & Amirian, S. M. R. (2021). Diagnosing L2 learners’ development through online computerized dynamic assessment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(7). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1645181
Mijwil, M. M., Abdulrhman, S. H., Abttan, R. A., Faieq, A. K., & Alkhazraji, A. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Applications in English Language Teaching: A Short Survey. Asian Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.24203/ajas.v10i6.7111
Monteiro, K., & Kim, Y. J. (2020). The effect of input characteristics and individual differences on L2 comprehension of authentic and modified listening tasks. System, 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102336
Nikonova, E., Yakhyaeva, K., Pivkina, N., & Schetinina, A. (2023). Using Artificial Intelligence Tools in Teaching a Foreign Language in Higher Technical Institutions. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2023.2.578
Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020
Pérez-Paredes, P. (2022). A systematic review of the uses and spread of corpora and data-driven learning in CALL research during 2011–2015. In Computer Assisted Language Learning (Vol. 35, Issues 1–2). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1667832
Pérez-Paredes, P., Ordoñana Guillamón, C., & Aguado Jiménez, P. (2018). Language teachers’ perceptions on the use of OER language processing technologies in MALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(5–6). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1418754
Qin, T., & Zhang, J. (2018). Computerized dynamic assessment and second language learning: Programmed mediation to promote future development. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.17.2.198
Ranalli, J. (2018). Automated written corrective feedback: how well can students make use of it? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(7). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1428994
Saricaoglu, A. (2019). The impact of automated feedback on L2 learners’ written causal explanations. ReCALL, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401800006X
Schmidt, T., & Strasser, T. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching: A CALL for Intelligent Practice. Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies, 33(1).
Smutny, P., & Schreiberova, P. (2020). Chatbots for learning: A review of educational chatbots for the Facebook Messenger. Computers and Education, 151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103862
Son, J.-B., Ružić, N. K., & Philpott, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence technologies and applications for language learning and teaching. Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2023-0015
Sotomayor Cantos, K. F., Varas Giler, R. C., & Castro Magayanes, I. E. (2023). Artificial Intelligence In Language Teaching And Learning. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i4.7368
Spring, R., & Tabuchi, R. (2022). The Role of ASR Training in EFL Pronunciation Improvement: An In-depth Look at the Impact of Treatment Length and Guided Practice on Specific Pronunciation Points. CALL-EJ, 23(3).
Tai, T. Y., & Chen, H. H. J. (2023). The impact of Google Assistant on adolescent EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1841801
Tobing, M. B., SNA, F. I., Hayrunnisa, N. R., Haswuri, N. I. T., Sutarsyah, C., & Munifatullah, F. (2023). An exploration of Artificial Intelligence in English Language Teaching as a foreign language. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 06(06). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i6-78
Tono, Y., Satake, Y., & Miura, A. (2014). The effects of using corpora on revision tasks in L2 writing with coded error feedback. ReCALL, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401400007X
Wang, J., Hwang, G. H., & Chang, C. Y. (2021). Directions of the 100 most cited chatbot-related human behavior research: A review of academic publications. In Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100023
Xu, Z., Wijekumar, K., Ramirez, G., Hu, X., & Irey, R. (2019). The effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems on K-12 students’ reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. In British Journal of Educational Technology (Vol. 50, Issue 6). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12758
Yang, Y., & Qian, D. D. (2020). Promoting L2 English learners’ reading proficiency through computerized dynamic assessment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5–6). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1585882
Yin, N. (2021). Research on the Impacts of Artificial Intelligence Technology on Language Teaching Innovation. Frontiers in Educational Research, 4(7), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.25236/fer.2021.040706
Zein, S., Sukyadi, D., Hamied, F. A., & Lengkanawati, N. S. (2020). English language education in Indonesia: A review of research (2011-2019). In Language Teaching (Vol. 53, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000208
Zhai, N., & Ma, X. (2022). Automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback: a systematic investigation of college students’ acceptance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1897019
Zhai, X. (2023). ChatGPT User Experience: Implications for Education. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418
Zhang, J., & Lu, X. (2019). Measuring and supporting second language development using computerized dynamic assessment. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 6(SpecialIssue1). https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.31710
All articles published in English Review: Journal of English Education (ERJEE) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Copyright Ownership
Authors retain the copyright of their articles and grant ERJEE the right of first publication. The journal is granted a non-exclusive license to publish, reproduce, and distribute the article in any format, medium, or platform, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors.
License Terms – CC BY 4.0
Under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, others are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially
As long as they:
- Provide appropriate credit to the original author(s) and source
- Provide a link to the license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
- Indicate if any changes were made
There are no restrictions on the reuse, reproduction, or adaptation of published articles as long as attribution is properly given.
Author Warranties
By submitting a manuscript to ERJEE, authors confirm that:
- The work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright.
- The manuscript has not been previously published and is not under consideration elsewhere.
- All sources and references are appropriately acknowledged.
- Necessary permissions have been obtained for any copyrighted materials used.






