ENHANCING SPEAKING SKILLS IN HIGHER EDUCATION THROUGH CANVAS LMS: A STUDY IN BANDA ACEH
Abstract
This study examines the effectiveness of Canvas, a web-based Learning Management System (LMS), in enhancing the speaking proficiency of first-semester students majoring in Psychology at Universitas Muhammadiyah Aceh, Indonesia. A quasi-experimental design was employed, with 30 students divided into 15 in the experimental group (Canvas) and 15 in the control group (Zoom). Both groups participated in five online learning sessions, with the first serving as a pre-test (offline), the next three as treatment sessions (online), and the final meeting as a post-test (offline). Students' speaking skills were assessed based on Vocabulary, Pronunciation, Grammar, Fluency, and Content aspects. Statistical analysis using paired sample t-tests in SPSS 26 confirmed significant improvements in all five speaking aspects for both groups, though the Canvas group outperformed the Zoom group across all measures. The results indicated that Canvas facilitated better engagement, structured learning, and interactive communication tools, leading to higher mean scores in Vocabulary and Fluency. A post-study questionnaire also revealed strongly positive student perceptions regarding Canvas's effectiveness in task submission and online learning accessibility. These findings support the integration of Canvas LMS in higher education curricula and have practical implications for EFL educators, policymakers, and curriculum designers in optimizing digital learning strategies. The study stresses Canvas as a pedagogically effective platform for developing students' communicative competence in English.
References
Al-Ataby, A. (2021). Hybrid learning using Canvas LMS. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 2(6), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2021.2.6.180
Al-Sofi, B. B. M. A. (2021). Student satisfaction with e-learning using Blackboard LMS during the Covid-19 circumstances: Realities, expectations, and future prospects. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 11(4), 265-281. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.11.04.26
Aziz, A., & Kashinathan, S. (2021). ESL learners’ challenges in speaking English in Malaysian classroom. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education & Development, 10(1), 983–991.
Arkorful, V., & Bervell, B. (2020). LMS-enabled blended learning utilization in distance tertiary education: Establishing the relationships among facilitating conditions, voluntariness of use and use behavior. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 6.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Bahadorfar, M., & Omidvar, R. (2014). Technology in teaching speaking skill. Acme International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(1), 9–13.
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Longman.
Burton, Lorelle J., Dowling, David, Dorman, Marilyn and Brodie, Lyn. (2005). Understanding student diversity and the factors that influence academic success: a preliminary study. In D. M. McInerey & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Focus on curriculum (pp. 275-298). Information Age Publishing.
Chevereva, S. A., & Sakova, T. G. (2021). Fundamentals of choosing an LMS platform for distance learning. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems Journal, 45(9), 348–353.
Pappas, C. (2015). Google classroom review: Pros and cons of using google classroom in eLearning. eLearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/google-classroom-review-pros-and-cons-of-using-google-classroom-in-elearning
Elfeky, A. I. M., Masadeh, T. S. Y., & Elbyaly, M. Y. H. (2020). Advance organizers in flipped classroom via e-learning management system and the promotion of integrated science process skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity Journal, 3(5), 1.
Gamage, S. H. P. W., Ayres, J. R. & Behrend, M. B. (2022). A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(9), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00323-x
Gay, L., Mills, G., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). Pearson.
Hasan, M. M., Ibrahim, F., Mustapha, S. M., Islam, M. M., & Younus, M. A. A. (2018). The use of YouTube videos in learning English language skills at tertiary level in Bangladesh. Infrastructure University Kuala Lumpur Research Journal, 6(1), 27–34.
Haynes, C. A., & Shelton, K. (2018). Beyond the classroom: A framework for growing school capacity in a digital age. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(4), 271–281.
Iksan, M., Yahya, A., Thayyib, M., & Ilmi, B. (2022). Online English learning at junior high school: How the students perceive Schoology as learning media. International Journal of Asian Education, 3(1), 40-55. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v3i1.268
Ismailia, T. (2022). The practice of learning management system (LMS) in teaching speaking. Journal of English in Academic and Professional Communication, 8(2), 59–70.
Karwati, E. (2014). Pengaruh pembelajaran elektronik (e-learning) terhadap mutu belajar mahasiswa [The influence of e-learning based on information technology toward students’ quality of learning]. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 17(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.20422/jpk.v17i1.5
Kuppuraj, K. (2017). ICT to enhance speaking skills. International Journal of English Language Literature in Humanities, 34(6), 1–12.
Leary, M. R. (2012). Introduction to behavioral research methods (6th ed.). Pearson.
Liu, F., Hu, L., & Gan, J. (2013). A study on the learning style preferences with different academic backgrounds: Taking Tujia EFL learners as examples. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3, 100-107.
Majeed, M. R. A., & Muslim, I. M. (2016). Technology usage in English language teaching and learning: Reality and dream. Journal of College of Education for Women, 27(1), 2180–2191.
Matthews, B., & Ross, L. (2010). Research methods. Pearson Longman.
Marek, M. W., & Wu, W. (2011). Using Facebook and Skype as social media in an EFL conversation class. Paper presented at the 28th International Conference on Teaching and Learning in the ROC. National Taichung University of Education.
McKnight, K., O’Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M. K., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194–211.
Mendis, U., & Dharmawan, Y. (2019). Understanding learner interaction in web based learning to improve English speaking skills in second grade of SMAN 4 Senior High School Bandar Lampung: Using Canvas Learning Management System. Journal of English Education Studies, 2(1), 74-85. https://doi.org/10.30653/005.201921.38
Mohanty, L., & Vohra, N. (2006). ICT strategies for school: A guide for school administrators. Sage.
Muslem, A., Yusuf, Y. Q., & Juliana, R. (2018). Perceptions and barriers to ICT use among English teachers in Indonesia. Teaching English with Technology, 18(1), 3-23
Nhi, N. V. B., & Anh, N. T. C. (2024). The utilization of the Canva application for enhancing speaking skills among non-English major students at The People’s Police College II. Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology, 3(2), 119-127.
Prasetya, R. E. (2022). The usage of online assessment Moodle LMS and Google Classroom environment for English language teaching. Panyonara: Journal of English Education, 4(2), 136-158. https://doi.org/10.19105/panyonara.v4i2.6219
Putri, E., & Sari, F. M. (2020). Indonesian EFL students’ perspectives towards learning management system software. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 20–24.
Sabran, & Sabara, E. (2019). Keefektifan Google Classroom sebagai media pembelajaran [The effectiveness of Google Classroom as a learning medium]. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Lembaga Penelitian (pp. 122-125). Universitas Negeri Makassar.
Silviyanti, T. M., & Yusuf, Y. Q. (2014). EFL teachers’ perceptions on using ICT in their teaching: To use or to reject? Teaching English with Technology, 15(4), 29-43.
Smaldino, S., Lowther, D. L., Mims, C., & Russell, J. (2014). Instructional technology and media for learning (11th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Sudaryono, Margono, G., & Rahayu, W. (2013). Pengembangan instrumen penelitian pendidikan [Development of educational research instruments]. Graha Ilmu.
Sugiyono, A. (2014). Penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D [Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D approaches]. Alfabeta.
Truong, H. (2021). Students’ perception towards the use of Moodle-based LMS in learning speaking skills at the tertiary level. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 533, 128-134.
Tuan, P. T. (2023). The implementation of Canvas to enhance English teaching and learning. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 191-196. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2023.5.2.22
Washington, G. Y. (2019). The learning management system matters in face-to-face higher education courses. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 48(2), 255–275. https://doi.org/[insert DOI if available]
Yaprak, Z. (2022). The use of Canvas, a Learning Management System, to reduce EFL learners’ public speaking anxiety. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(5), 333-347. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.467.20
Vonti, L. H., Rosyid, A., Hidayati, P. S. (2023). Technology-integrated blended class: Student reflections on the use of Moodle-based digital interactive book. English Review: Journal of English Education, 11(1), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v11i1.6932
York, R. (2017). Statistics for human service evaluation. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071801024
Yusuf, Q., Yusuf, Y. Q., Erdiana, N., & Pratama, A. R. (2018). Engaging with Edmodo to teach English writing of narrative texts to EFL students. Problems of Education in the 21St Century, 76(3), 333-349.
All articles published in English Review: Journal of English Education (ERJEE) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Copyright Ownership
Authors retain the copyright of their articles and grant ERJEE the right of first publication. The journal is granted a non-exclusive license to publish, reproduce, and distribute the article in any format, medium, or platform, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors.
License Terms – CC BY 4.0
Under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, others are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially
As long as they:
- Provide appropriate credit to the original author(s) and source
- Provide a link to the license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
- Indicate if any changes were made
There are no restrictions on the reuse, reproduction, or adaptation of published articles as long as attribution is properly given.
Author Warranties
By submitting a manuscript to ERJEE, authors confirm that:
- The work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright.
- The manuscript has not been previously published and is not under consideration elsewhere.
- All sources and references are appropriately acknowledged.
- Necessary permissions have been obtained for any copyrighted materials used.






