ONLINE ESP TEACHING DURING THE COVID 19 PANDEMIC: STUDENTS’ VOICES
Abstract
This study was aimed to evaluate the online ESP teaching in a Maritime Polytechnic in Indonesia, focusing on the teaching media used by the Maritime English lecturers: the Learning Management System, Zoom, and YouTube. 195 students of the Nautical Studies Department were involved in completing a questionnaire. 12 of them were involved in a Focus Group Interview to obtain more detailed and comprehensive information. Thematic analysis was used to analyze data and a thematic map was presented to illustrate the relationship between the themes. The findings of this study indicate that most students perceived the teaching media used by the lecturers in the online Maritime English classroom were beneficial. However, each teaching medium was reported to have its advantages and disadvantages. If combined appropriately, they can facilitate students’ language learning. It is suggested that the lecturers explore various teaching media and arrange appropriate pacing in their teaching practices. The lecturers also need to prepare their lessons well before teaching to ensure that students can receive the best online learning experience.
References
Bailenson, J. N. (2021). Nonverbal overload: A theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 2(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000030
Binmahboob, T. (2020). YouTube as a learning tool to improve students’ speaking skills as perceived by EFL teachers in secondary school. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 9(6), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.9n.6p.13
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Terry, G. (2019). Thematic Analysis. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences (pp. 843–860). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4
Fauville, G., Luo, M., Queiroz, A. C. M., Bailenson, J. N., & Hancock, J. (2021). Zoom exhaustion & fatigue scale. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 4, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100119
Fu, M., & Li, S. (2020). The effects of immediate and delayed corrective feedback on L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000388
Gao, L. X., & Zhang, L. J. (2020). Teacher learning in difficult times: Examining foreign language teachers’ cognitions about online teaching to tide over COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.549653
Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2012). The use of video-conferencing to support multimodal interaction in an online language classroom. ReCALL, 24(2), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401200002X
Hikmah, D. (2019). Media for language teaching and learning in digital era. International Journal of English Education and Linguistics (IJoEEL), 1(2), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.33650/ijoeel.v1i2.963
Ho, W. Y. J., & Tai, K. W. H. (2020). Doing expertise multilingually and multimodally in online English teaching videos. System, 94, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102340
Iswati, L. (2021). When teaching must go on: ESP teachers’ strategies and challenges during COVID-19 pandemic. Eralingua: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Asing dan Sastra, 5(1), 35–52. Retrieved from https://ojs.unm.ac.id/eralingua
Kabooha, R., & Elyas, T. (2018). The effects of YouTube in multimedia instruction for vocabulary learning: Perceptions of EFL students and teachers. English Language Teaching, 11(2), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n2p72
Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). Facilitating synchronous online language learning through Zoom. RELC Journal, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220937235
Kuama, S., & Intharaksa, U. (2016). Is online learning suitable for all English language students? PASAA, 52, 53–82. Retrieved from http://libproxy.usc.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1895977430?accountid=14749
Li, S., Zhu, Y., & Ellis, R. (2016). The effects of the timing of corrective feedback on the acquisition of a new linguistic structure. Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 276–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12315
Malik, M., Fatima, G., Hussain, A., & Sarwar, A. (2017). E-learning: Students’ perspectives about asynchronous and synchronous resources at higher education level. Bulletin of Education and Research, 39(2), 183–195. Retrieved from http://proxy.cityu.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.proxy.cityu.edu/docview/1986751399?accountid=1230
Mandasari, Y. P., & Wulandari, E. (2021). Teaching ESP during emergency remote learning (ERL): Best practices. Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(2), 154–162. Retrieved from http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/elt
Novawan, A., Alvarez-Tosalem, S. M., Ismailia, T., Wicaksono, J. A., & Setiarini, R. B. (2021). Students’ experiences of online English language learning by using YouTube. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 514, 220–226. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210101.048
Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2013). The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes (B. Paltridge & S. Starfield, Eds.). West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Perveen, A. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous e-language learning: A case study of Virtual University of Pakistan. Open Praxis, 8(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.1.212
Sakkir, G., Dollah, S., & Ahmad, J. (2020). Students’ perceptions toward using YouTube in EFL classrooms. Journal of Applied Science, Engineering, Technology, and Education, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.35877/454ri.asci2125
Satar, H. M. (2016). Meaning-making in online language learner interactions via desktop videoconferencing. ReCALL, 28(3), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344016000100
Shockley, K. M., Gabriel, A. S., Robertson, D., Rosen, C. C., Chawla, N., Ganster, M. L., & Ezerins, M. E. (2021). The fatiguing effects of camera use in virtual meetings: A within-person field experiment. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(8), 1137–1155. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000948
Simbolon, N. E., & Yusnita, F. (2020). The selection of learning materials from Youtube resources for a Maritime English Course. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 460–470. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i2.28587
Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L., Mims, C., & Russell, J. D. (2015). Instructional technology and media for learning (11th ed., Vol. 148). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Wang, H. C., & Chen, C. W. yu. (2019). Learning English from YouTubers: English L2 learners’ self-regulated language learning on YouTube. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(4), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1607356
Zaidi, A., Awaludin, F. A., Karim, R. A., Ghani, N. F. C., Rani, M. S. A., & Ibrahim, N. (2018). University students’ perceptions of YouTube usage in (ESL) classrooms. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(1), 534–545. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i1/3826
All articles published in English Review: Journal of English Education (ERJEE) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Copyright Ownership
Authors retain the copyright of their articles and grant ERJEE the right of first publication. The journal is granted a non-exclusive license to publish, reproduce, and distribute the article in any format, medium, or platform, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors.
License Terms – CC BY 4.0
Under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, others are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially
As long as they:
- Provide appropriate credit to the original author(s) and source
- Provide a link to the license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
- Indicate if any changes were made
There are no restrictions on the reuse, reproduction, or adaptation of published articles as long as attribution is properly given.
Author Warranties
By submitting a manuscript to ERJEE, authors confirm that:
- The work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright.
- The manuscript has not been previously published and is not under consideration elsewhere.
- All sources and references are appropriately acknowledged.
- Necessary permissions have been obtained for any copyrighted materials used.