LEARNER AUTONOMY IN THE CONTEXT OF MB-KM POLICY: UNIVERSITY TEACHERS’ BELIEFS AND PRACTICES
Abstract
Learner autonomy has been regarded as the point of pivotal in the implementation of the new Curriculum Merdeka. This study aims to describe the lecturers’ beliefs and practices in learner autonomy (LA) within the implementation of MBKM (Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka) policy. Applying a qualitative method with a case study design, this research involved 56 English Education Program university lecturers whose working within MBKM policy as the participants for the questionnaire. Then, 5 of the participants were further selected as the respondents of the interview and document analysis. The research reveals that the lecturers were knowledgeable about the notion of LA. It was shown as LA was mentioned in the construction of instructional material and design also in the teaching and learning process. Furthermore, the lecturers believed that LA supports the autonomous leaners’ language development during the implementation of MBKM policy. Two aspects, which are political-technical environment and learning ecosystem, dominated the lecturers’ perspectives in considering that MBKM policy seems to be able to give more educational choices for the learner to study both in and out of the classroom environment. However, it is depicted that, the psychological and sociocultural aspects, such as that of the relatively low degree of the students’ confidence, readiness, and agility in learning, seemed to remain problematic as they tend to hinder the development of LA. Therefore, the lecturers indicated that taking a role in facilitating the students’ LA development is still required to anticipate the obstacles.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmadianzadeh, B., Seifoori, Z., & Hadidi Tamjid, N. (2020). Exploring EFL teachers’ beliefs about and practices of learner autonomy across experience and licensure. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1501694
Ahmed, U., & Hashim, S. (2022). Sustainable brand management: the role of internal brand management and intrinsic motivation in building employee’s brand relationship quality towards organization’s brand. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416660
Almusharraf, N. (2021). Incorporation of a game-based approach into the EFL online classrooms: students’ perceptions. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1969953
Alrashidi, O. (2022). Exploring learner autonomy: Secondary School EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices in the Saudi context. World Journal of English Language, 12(8), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n8p97
Aprianti, F. (2017). EFL teachers ’ perceptions on ICT use for continuing professional development. Journal of English Language Teaching and Technology, 1(1), 12–21. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/ELTTech/article/view/9427/6183
Aprianti, F., & Winarto, E. (2021). Developing learner autonomy in writing through the use of e-portfolio. ENGLISH REVIEW: Journal of English Education, 10(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v10i1.5354
Boonma, N., & Swatevacharkul, R. (2020). The effect of autonomous learning process on learner autonomy of English public speaking students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.17509/IJAL.V10I1.25037
Cakici, D. (2017). An investigation of learner autonomy in Turkish EFL context. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n2p89
Creswell, W. John & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9).
Darsih, E. (2018). Fostering language learner autonomy: Indonesian EFL lecturers voices. English Review: Journal of English Education, 7(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v7i1.1495
Dogan, C., & Kirkgoz, Y. (2022). Promoting continuous professional development of English teachers through action research. International Journal of Educational Reform, 31(3), 246–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879211062224
Dorji, J. (2020). Facilitating students overcome their limitations through doing their own action research. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(10), 1240–1247. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1010.08
Ebadi, S., Rasouli, R., & Mohamadi, M. (2021). Exploring EFL learners’ perspectives on using Kahoot as a game-based student response system. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1881798
Elekaei, A., Faramarzi, S., & Tabrizi, H. H. (2016). Autonomy, critical thinking and listening comprehension ability of iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(2), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.2p.40
Eno, M. A., Ahad, A. M., & Shafat, A. (2019). Perceptions of academic administrators and policymakers on ESL/EFL education. Journal of Somali Studies, 6(1), 93–119. https://doi.org/10.31920/2056-5682/2019/v6n1a4
Esfandiari, S., Mahmoudi, A., & Davaribina, M. (2021). Engage model as an innovation in teaching speaking: A case of cognitively more and less active EFL learners. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures, 13(4), 729–753. https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.13.4.8
Eslami, Z. R., & Derakhshan, A. (2020). Promoting advantageous ways for teachers and learners to deal with corrective feedback. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 19, 48–65. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2020.19.04
Fadaee, E., Marzban, A., & Najafi Karimi, S. (2021). The relationship between autonomy, second language teaching styles, and personality traits: A case study of Iranian EFL teachers. Cogent Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1881203
Fandiño Parra, Y. J., Barriga, A. M., López Díaz, R. A., & Galindo Cuesta, J. A. (2021). Teacher education and critical thinking: Systematizing theoretical perspectives and formative experiences in Latin America. Revista de Investigacion Educativa, 39(1), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.6018/RIE.416271
Flores, S. I., Zubiría, M. M. C., & Sebire, R. H. E. (2022). Processes employed to introduce autonomous learning. SiSal Journal, 13(4), 426–441. https://doi.org/10.37237/130404
García Zabaleta, O., & Pérez-Izaguirre, E. (2022). The development of student autonomy in Spain over the last 10 years: a review. Educational Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1987389
Hugo, M., Anderberg, M., & Dahlberg, M. (2021). Between motivation and unwillingness: Young people in outpatient treatment for substance use problems. Youth Voice Journal, 11, 1–19. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85104133355&partnerID=40&md5=0b02ff16a1b9bec0ecafc9b081f2c6fb
Lai, C., Yeung, Y., & Hu, J. (2016). University student and teacher perceptions of teacher roles in promoting autonomous language learning with technology outside the classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 703–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1016441
Leavy, P. (2018). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, art-based, and community-based participatory research approaches.
Lee, H., & Mori, C. (2021). Reflective practices and self-directed learning competencies in second language university classes. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(1), 130–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1772196
Lengkanawati, N. S. (2017). Learner autonomy in the Indonesian EFL settings. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 222–231. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v6i2.4847
Lennert da Silva, A. L. (2021). Comparing teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2021.1965372
Magnusson, J., & Zackariasson, M. (2019). Student independence in undergraduate projects: different understandings in different academic contexts. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(10), 1404–1419. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1490949
Nath, K., & Meena, N. (2019). Learner strategies and communicative acquisition: Learner’s autonomy from the Indian perspective. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(6), 1142–1146. https://doi.org/10.18510/HSSR.2019.76163
Nguyen, S. Van, & Habók, A. (2021). Designing and validating the learner autonomy perception questionnaire. Heliyon, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06831
Parcerisa, L., Verger, A., Pagès, M., & Browes, N. (2022). Teacher autonomy in the age of performance-based accountability: A review based on teaching profession regulatory models (2017-2020). Education Policy Analysis Archives, 30. https://doi.org/10.14507/EPAA.30.6204
Podder, R. (2021). Reflection practice: A strategy for pre-service teacher development. Bangladesj Teacher Education Journal (BTEJ), 1(1), 101–115. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260015080
Resnik, P., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2021). Learner emotions, autonomy and trait emotional intelligence in “in-person” versus emergency remote English foreign language teaching in Europe. Applied Linguistics Review. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2020-0096
Ruelens, E. (2019). Measuring language learner autonomy in higher education: The self-efficacy questionnaire of language learning strategies. Language Learning in Higher Education, 9(2), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2019-0020
Saguni, F. (2021). The adversity quotient between teacher professionalism on student’s autonomous learning. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 12(3), 312–342. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85117158476&partnerID=40&md5=0210f9681b5547ba671d796e54c0c69b
Saraswati, S. (2019). EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices on learner autonomy. English Joirnal, 13(2), 99–112.
Suherdi, D., Nadya, N. L., Harahap, A., & Astrid, A. (2022). Teacher readiness and challenges in creating learner autonomy in ICT-based English learning activities. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(3), 708–717. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i3.34667
Tan Tin, D. (2020). Learner autonomy-promoting practices in a transition context. LASiG Learner Autonomy Special Interest Group, 1(80), 5–8.
Tran, T. Q., & Duong, T. M. (2020). EFL learners’ perceptions of factors influencing learner autonomy development. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 41(1), 194–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.02.009
Tuyen, L. Van, & An, H. T. (2019). Learner autonomy: Practices used and challenges encountered by EFL teachers in fostering learner autonomy at tertiary level. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 35(4), 130–151. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4402
Uličná, K., Píšová, M., Hanušová, S., Janíková, V., & Najvar, P. (2016). Expert teacher: Objective determinants of developing and maintaining expertise (in FLT Perspective). XLinguae, 9(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2016.09.01.91-109
Xu, G., & Kim, J. (2022). Building and sustaining a group of Chinese EFL learners’ imagined identities and agency. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084659
Yasmin, M., & Sohail, A. (2018). A creative alliance between learner autonomy and English language learning: Pakistani university teachers’ beliefs. Creativity Studies, 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3846/23450479.2017.1406874
Yasmin, M., & Yasmeen, A. (2021). Viability of outcome-based education in teaching English as second language to chemical engineering learners. Education for Chemical Engineers, 36, 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.04.005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v11i2.8422
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 English Review: Journal of English Education