CHALLENGES IN FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT IMPLEMENTATION FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTRUCTION

Maya Puspitasari, Muhammad Arifin Pelawi

Abstract


We investigated how the Covid-19 pandemic affected formative assessment in English subjects in Indonesian junior and senior secondary schools in this study. Teachers' perceptions of their formative assessment practices at Indonesian schools is the main object of the study. This study studied formative assessment in English teaching in Indonesia in emergency remote teaching. Data was collected using open-ended questionnaires, which were then distributed via the WhatsApp group to 82 English teachers across the country. The respondents were English teachers from various Indonesian junior and secondary schools. This research was divided into four sections: (1) technique, (2) integrity, (3) media used, and (4) challenges. In this study, the majority of teachers believed that face-to-face instruction could provide better formative assessment than online learning. They could use more techniques, be more confident in the outcome, have more media, and face fewer challenges. Because of a lack of infrastructure and media, including internet access, in Indonesia, assessment practises during online learning had deteriorated. The findings suggested that the participating teachers found formative assessment via online learning to be distressing.

Keywords


Digital Technology, English Language Teaching, Online Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aidinopoulou, V., & Sampson, D. G. (2017). An action research study from implementing the flipped classroom model in primary school history teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 237-247.

Barbour, M.K. (2018). The landscape of K-12 online learning: Examining what is known. In Handbook of distance education (pp. 521-542). Routledge.

Bhagat, K. K., & Spector, J. M. (2017). Formative assessment in complex problem-solving domains: The emerging role of assessment technologies. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 312-317. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26229226

Bond, M. (2021). Schools and emergency remote education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A living rapid systematic review. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), pp.191-247. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4425683

Butler, S. M., & McMunn, N. D. (2006). A Teacher's Guide to Classroom Assessment: Understanding and Using Assessment to Improve Student Learning. Jossey-Bass, An Imprint of Wiley. 10475 Crosspoint Blvd, Indianapolis, IN 46256.

Cleveland-Innes, M., Garrison, R., Vaughan, N., Moore, M.G. and Diehl, W.C. (2018). Implications for distance education and beyond. Handbook of distance education, pp.169-181, Routledge.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education: Sixth Edition. New York: Routledge.

Dewaele, J. M. (2018). Online questionnaires. In The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 269-286). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Dixson, D. D., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Formative and summative assessment in the classroom. Theory into practice, 55(2), 153-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989

Harlen. W. (2007). Assessment of Learning. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Harlen, W., & James, M. (1997). Assessment and learning: Differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assessment in education: Principles, policy & practice, 4(3), 365-379. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594970040304

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, (March 27, 2020). Retrieved from: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning.

Jang, E. E., & Sinclair, J. (2021). Diagnostic assessment in language classrooms. In The Routledge handbook of language testing (pp. 187-205). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203181287-16

McMillan, J. H., Andrade, H. L., & Heritage, M. (2017). Using formative assessment to enhance learning, achievement, and academic self-regulation. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623856

Okebukola, P.A., Suwadu, B., Oladejo, A., Nyandwi, R., Ademola, I., Okorie, H. and Awaah, F., (2020). Delivering high school Chemistry during COVID-19 lockdown: Voices from Africa. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), pp.3285-3289. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00725

Rahim, A. F. A. (2020). Guidelines for online assessment in emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education in Medicine Journal, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2020.12.2.6

Van der Kleij, F. M., Vermeulen, J. A., Schildkamp, K., & Eggen, T. J. (2015). Integrating data-based decision making, assessment for learning and diagnostic testing in formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(3), 324-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.999024

Wiliam, D. (2020). Research into practice: The case of classroom formative assessment. In Getting Evidence into Education (pp. 119-135). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429290343

Yilmaz, F. G. K., Ustun, A. B., & Yilmaz, R. (2020). Investigation of pre-service teachers' opinions on advantages and disadvantages of online formative assessment: an example of online multiple-choice exam. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, 2(1), 1-8.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v12i1.8853

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 English Review: Journal of English Education