A STUDY OF WRITING TASKS IN THE NMET 2014

Lin Dunlai

Abstract


Abstract: The National Matriculation English Test (NMET) is a high-stakes test compulsory for those aspiring to entering higher education institutions in China. The test is designed by the National Education Examinations Authority (NEEA) and some local examination authorities. The final section of this test is generally a writing task. In this paper, the author examines the 21 writing tasks that were used in the NMET 2014. Using content analysis, and a priori validation components of Weir’s (2005) socio-cognitive validation framework, namely test taker characteristics, cognitive validity and context validity, the paper finds out the merits and demerits of these 21 writing tasks. It is concluded that these writing tasks are generally well designed and are valid in helping select talents. But more empirical research must be done to investigate how the writing tasks function for students when taking these writing tests.

Keywords: NMET, socio-cognitive validation framework, cognitive validity, context validity, China

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alderson, J. C., Clapham, C., & Wall, D. (1995). Language Test Construction and Evaluation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bachman, L. F. (1991). What does language testing have to offer? TESOL Quarterly, 25(4), 671-704.

Bachman, L. F. & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Berry, V. (2004). A Study of the Interaction between Individual Personality Differences and Oral Performance Test Facets. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, the University of London.

Cheng, L. Y. & Qi, L. (2006). Description and examination of the National Matriculation English Test. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(1), 53-70.

Coombe, C., Folse, K., & Hubley, N. (2007). A Practical Guide to Assessing English Language Learners. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Ding, Y. (2012). A concurrent study of the writing tasks of the NMET 2011. Educational Measurement and Assessment, 3, 55-59.

Elliott, M. & Wilson, J. (2013). Context validity. In A. Geranpayeh & L. Taylor (Eds.). Examining Listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 152-241.

Eysenck, M. & Keane, M. (2005). Cognitive Psychology (5th Ed.). Hove: Psychology Press.

Field, J. (2004). Psycholinguistics: the Key Concepts. London: Routledge.

Gao, X. & Gu, X. (2008). Characteristics and problems of the NMET writing tasks set by local examination authorities. Foreign Language Teaching in Schools, 3, 18-22.

Gu, X. & Gao, X. (2007). A concurrent study of the writing tasks of the NMET 2007. China Examinations, 6, 28-33+36.

Hayes, J. R. & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.). The Science of Writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1-28.

Hyland, K. (2002). Teaching and Researching Writing. London: Longman.

Kellogg, R.T. (1994). The Psychology of Writing. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kellogg, R.T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.). The Science of Writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 57-72.

Lewkowicz, J. (2000). Authenticity in language testing: some outstanding questions. Language Testing, 17(1), 43-64.

Li, X. (1990). How powerful can a language test be? The MET in China. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 11, 393–404.

Liu, Q. (2010). The National Education Examinations Authority and its English Language Tests. In L. Cheng & A. Curtis (Eds.). (2010). English Language Assessment and the Chinese Learner. London: Routledge, 29-43.

NEEA. (2013). Examination syllabus for university entrance examination to higher education for 2014. Beijing, China: Higher Education Press.

O’Sullivan, B. (2000). Towards a model of performance in oral language testing. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Reading.

Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1987). Knowledge telling and knowledge transformation in written composition. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.). Advances in Applied Linguistics, Vol. 2, Reading, Writing and Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 142-175.

Shaw, S. D. & Weir, C. J. (2007). Examining writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Weir, C. J. (1993). Understanding and developing language tests. New York: Prentice Hall.

Weir, C. J. (2005). Language testing and validation: An evidence-based approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)