THE EFFECT OF IRANIAN FEMALE EFL LEARNERS’ POLITENESS STRATEGIES AWARENESS ON THEIR LETTER WRITING ABILITY

Faezeh Yousefian Dastmalchi

Abstract


Abstract: This research examines the effect of teaching politeness strategies based on the models proposed by Brown and Levinson (1987) and Leech (1983) to intermediate English learners on their ability in writing more polite letters. The instrumentation includes an IELTS test, used as a placement test, an inventory, used to measure learners’ awareness of politeness strategies, and a letter-writing test, used as a measurement of learners’ ability in using politeness strategies. Among all the participants, twenty of them were put in the control group, and twenty-four of them in the experimental group, who went under the treatment. They were taught how to write politely based on the politeness strategy models proposed by Brown and Levinson (1987) and Leech (1983). After the treatment, learners wrote letters to the same people with the same situations. Comparing the twenty learners in the control group with the twenty-four learners in experimental group, the researchers concluded that the treatment had a significant effect on the learners’ ability in writing more polite letters. They selected to use more formal strategies with those who they saw further distance with, and more informal strategies with more intimate people. Furthermore, the answers the learners provided to the questions of the inventory offered more awareness of politeness strategies. This implies that they were more aware of various choices of polite language that were available for them to use in the given situations.

Keywords: politeness strategy, face, face threatening act


Full Text:

PDF

References


Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press. New York. US.

Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2007). Students writing e-mails to faculty: an examination of e-politeness among native and non-native speakers of English. Journal of Language Learning & Technology, 11(2),. 59-81. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol11num2/biesenbachlucas/

Coulmas, F. (2005). Sociolinguistics: The study of speakers’ choices. Cambridge University Press. New York. US.

Fukushima, S., & Iwata, Y. (1985). Politeness in English. JALT Journal. Vol. 1 (1).

Gharaghani, Z., Eslami Rasekh, A. , Dabaghi, A., Tohidi, I. (2001). Effect of gender on politeness strategies in greetings of native speakers of Persian; English and EFL learners. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(3), 93-117.

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman Publishing group. New York. US.

Maier, P. (1992). Politeness strategies in business letters by native and non-native English speakers. Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 11(3), 189–205. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(05) 80009-2.

Watts, R. J. (2003). Key topics in sociolinguistics: Politeness. Cambridge University Press. UK.

Wardhaugh, R. (2006). An introduction to sociolinguistics. Backwell Publishing. USA, UK, Australia.

Le Ha, Ph. (2001). How do culturally situated notions of `polite' forms influence the way. Vietnamese postgraduate students write academic English in Australia? Australian Journal of Education. 45.

Lorenzo-Dus, N. Bou-Franch, P. (2003). Gender and Politeness: Spanish and British Undergraduates’ Perceptions of Appropriate Requests. de la Mujer. 187-199.

Chen, R. (2001). Self-politeness: A proposal. Journal of Pragmatics. 33, 87-106.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)

View My Stats

Creative Commons License style=
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License