MODEL OF CONTEXTUAL-BASED ACADEMIC WRITING LEARNING MODULE

Afif Rofii, Fathiaty Murtadho, Aceng Rahmat

Abstract


This research and development aims to develop a contextual-based learning module for academic writing course to develop the students’ writing skill. It adopts Borg & Gall’s model modified from Jolly and Bolitho’s model of development steps. The development steps include: assessing the teaching materials currently implemented, designing and developing the module, judging module feasibility by experts, and testing module effectiveness. It applies mixed method approach to describe textual data qualitatively and analyze numerical data using t-test. The data were obtained from need analysis through document analysis, interview, observation, survey, and experiment. The analysis found that the lecturers and students need appropriate, practical and effective teaching materials that meet their needs. Therefore, the module of writing teaching material is developed by integrating the seven components of contextual approach in various learning activities. Th epracticality test suggests that the module is very pratical. The feasibility test 82.27 in average confirming that the module is very feasible to develop. The effectiveness test found that it is very effective reflected in the posttest mean score of experimental class (78.10) that is significally different from the control class (69.80). The tests of practicality, feasibility, and effectiveness come into conclusion that the developed module can be implemented in the academic writing class. As suggesstion, the lecturers and researchers are recommended to develop comprehensively teaching materials aligning with the students’ needs.

Keywords: model, contextual-based, academic writing, module, research and development

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akhadiah, S. (2008). Penulisan ilmiah. Jakarta: PPs Universitas Muhammadiyah.

Akhadiah, S., Arsjad, M. G., & Ridwan, S. H. (1996). Pembinaan kemampuan menulis bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational research: An introduction. New York: Longman Inc.

Depdiknas. (2008). Panduan pengembangan bahan ajar. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Gall, M. D., Gall, P. J., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Gay, L. R. (1992). Educational research competencies for analysis and aplication. New Jersey: A Simon & Scuster Company Engliwood Cliffs.

Ghaith, G. (2002). Writing. Retrieved November 5, 2016 from http://www.nadaisland.com/ghaith-writing.html.

Gillet, A. (2010). Using English for academic purpose: A guide for students in higher education. Retrieved November 5, 2016 from http://www.uefap.com/writing/writfram.htm.

Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning. California: Corwin Press, Inc.

Martens, N. L. (2010). Writing, processes and techniques. New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc.

Mulyasa, E. (2006). Kurikulum yang disempurnakan: pengembangan standar kompetensi dan kompetensi dasar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nasution. (1997). Berbagai pendekatan dalam proses belajar dan mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Nurhadi. (2004). Pembelajaran kontekstual (CTL) dan penerapannya dalam KBK. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Ridwan, S. H. (2011). Metodologi pembelajaran bahasa: Aplikasi dalam pengajaran morfologi-sintaksis. Yogyakarta: Kepel Press.

Rusman. (2012). Model-model pembelajaran. Jakarta: Grafindo Persada.

Sagala, S. (2011). Konsep dan makna pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Yusuf, A. M. (2005). Dasar-dasar dan teknik evaluasi pendidikan. Padang: Universitas Negeri Padang.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v6i2.1242

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 English Review: Journal of English Education