LEECH’S POLITENESS PRINCIPLE IN LENONG BETAWI HUMOROUS DIALOGUE ENTITLED “ANAK DURHAKA”

Ninuk Lustyantie, Figiati Indra Dewi

Abstract


Lenong Betawi is one of community theatrical performance that still exists. It has a significant role in criticizing current social life. This paper aims to find Leech’s politeness principle in the Lenong Betawi humorous dialogue entitled “Anak Durhaka.” A story staged by Sanggar Surya Kencana group and held by Betawi Culture Institute. The method used was a content analysis by using politeness principle of Leech. The percentage results of fulfillment politeness maxims obtained 12.28% for agreement maxim, 10.52% for tact maxim, 8.11% for sympathy maxim, 2.41% for generosity maxim, 1.97% for approbation maxim, and 0.87% for modesty maxim. It means that agreement maxim as the highest and modesty maxim as the lowest fulfillment politeness maxims in Lenong Betawi humorous dialogue. Meanwhile, the percentage results of violation politeness maxims obtained 9.21% for agreement maxim, 2.63% for tact maxim, 13.81% for sympathy maxim, 4.16% for generosity maxim, 20.83% for approbation maxim, and 13.15% for modesty maxim. It means approbation maxim as the highest and tact maxim as the lowest violation politeness maxims in Lenong Betawi humorous dialogue. Finally, it can be concluded that the violation politeness maxims is more found than fulfillment politeness maxims in Lenong Betawi humorous dialogue entitled “Anak Durhaka.”


Keywords


fulfilment politeness maxims; humorous dialogue; Leech’s politeness principle; lenong betawi; pragmatic; violation politeness maxims.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ayudia, E. T., & Yakti, R. P. (2016). Eksistensi lenong sebagai aset kebudayaan Betawi. Retrieved on June 22, 2016, from http://mediapublica.co/2016/06/22/eksistensi-lenong-sebagai-aset-kebudayaan-betawi/.

Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and method (4th ed.). New York: Pearson Education Group.

Bousfield, D. (2008). Impoliteness in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Chaer, A. (2010). Kesantunan berbahasa. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Dynel, M. (2013). Humorous phenomena in dramatic discourse. The European Journal of Humour Research, 1(1). doi: 10.7592/EJHR2013.1.1.dynel.

Jaszczolt, K. M. (2002). Semantics and pragmatics. Great Britain: Pearson Education.

Matwick, K. (2017). Self-deprecatory humor on TV cooking shows. Language & Communication, 56. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2017.04.005.

Moleong, L. J. (2002). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nadar, F. X. (2009). Pragmatik dan penelitian pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Pamungkas, D. A. (2010). The quality of the English textbook used by international standard junior high school. Unpublished Thesis. Malang: Faculty of Letters, State University of Malang.

Pangaribuan, T. (2008). Paradigma bahasa. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Petraki, E., & Ramayanti, I. (2018). Navigating the Indonesian workplace hierarchy: Manager's use of humour as a rapport building strategy. Journal of Pragmatics, 134. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.010.

Purzycki, B. G. (2011). Humor as violation and deprecation: A cognitive anthropological account. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 11(2). doi: 10.1163/156853711X568752.

Supriyana, A. (2012). Prinsip kerja sama dan prinsip kesantunan dalam wacana humor mahasiswa. Unpublished Thesis. Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

Tarigan, H. G. (1990). Pengajaran pragmatik. Bandung: Angkasa.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v7i2.1731

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 English Review: Journal of English Education