Alimin Adi Waloyo, Khoiriyah Khoiriyah, Rafika Rabba Farah


Primary school teachers have a crucial role to support CLIL and web-oriented media implementation in class. CLIL approach pedagogically offers double advantages; English competence and content development. This pedagogical approach leads to sufficient English input at the early stage of learning which makes primary learners able to shift the paradigm that English is a challenging language to learn. More importantly, primary school learners can take the advantages of the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) part of their daily use for the sake of CLIL, so learning can be fun and enjoyable. Nevertheless, much of the previous research in Indonesian context gives limited attention to how primary school teachers perceived CLIL interwoven into ICT based media.) that situation led into this research. Also, this research is expected to encourage the CLIL application in formal education, particularly in primary levels due to time efficacy and effectiveness. The involved participants were 12 primary school teachers in a primary school in Malang. A 14-item Likert-Scale questionnaire and FGD were applied to collect the data. It was found that the teachers perceive the CLIL and web-based media positively, but they would reconsider to implement it in their class due to English competency reasons and material design issue, facilities, and school support. Therefore, hybrid CLIL implementation and teachers’ collaboration are suggested.


CLIL; web-based platform; English competence; content instruction.

Full Text:



Alcaraz-Mármol, G. (2018). Trained and non-trained language teachers on CLIL methodology: Teachers’ facts and opinions about the CLIL approach in the primary education context in Spain. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 39–64. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.3

Bailey, N. (2015). Attaining Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in the primary school classroom. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(4), 418–426. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-3-4-6

Bentley, K. (2010). The TKT Course: CLIL Module. Cambridge University Press.

Bui, L. D. T., & Truong, T. T. N. (2015). CLIL in primary English lessons: teachers’ perspectives. Language Education in Asia, 6(2), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.5746/leia/15/v6/i2/a2/bui_truong

Campillo-Ferrer, J.-M., Miralles-martínez, P., & Sánchez-ibáñez, R. (2020). CLIL teachers’ views on cognitive development in primary education. Palgrave Communications, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0480-x

Campillo, J. M., Sánchez, R., & Miralles, P. (2019). Primary teachers’ perceptions of CLIL implementation in Spain. English Language Teaching, 12(4), 149. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n4p149

Dervin, F., & Dyer, C. (2016). Constructing methodology for qualitative research. Springer.

Diezmas, E. N. M. De. (2016). The impact of CLIL on the acquisition of L2 competences and skills in primary education. International Journal of English Studies, 16(2), 81–101.

Escobar Urmeneta, C. (2019). An Introduction to Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) for Teachers and Teacher Educators. CLIL. Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 2(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/clil.21

Fitriani, I. (2016). Grass roots’ voices on the CLIL implementation in tertiary education. Dinamika Ilmu, 16(2), 211. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v16i2.320

Heras, A., & Lasagabaster, D. (2015). The impact of CLIL on affective factors and vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 19(1), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541736

Jones, T. L., Baxter, M., & Khanduja, V. (2013). A quick guide to survey research. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 95(1), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588413X13511609956372

Khoiriyah. (2018). CLIL in Indonesia: The 4C’s Framework of Adopted CLIL Approach in Elementary School Khoiriyah. Proceedings Quality Improvement Innovation in ELT (COETIN), 1, 154–160.

Korosidou, E., & Griva, E. (2014). CLIL approach in primary education: Learning about Byzantine art and culture through a foreign language. Studies in English Language Teaching, 2(2), 240. https://doi.org/10.22158/selt.v2n2p240

Ludovico, L. A., & Zambelli, C. (2017). Web-based frameworks for CLIL in primary school: Design, implementation, pilot experimentation and results. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 739, 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63184-4_8

Mahmud, Y. (2020). Conceptualizing bilingual education programs through CLIL and genre-based approach: An Indonesian context. VELES Voices of English Language Education Society, 4(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v4i1.2005

Pinner, R. (2013). Authenticity of purpose: CLIL as a way to bring meaning and motivation into EFL contexts. Asian EFL Journal, 15(4), 138–159.

Rohmah, I. I. T. (2019). The feasibility and effectiveness of integrating content knowledge and English competences for assessing English proficiency in CLIL. ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal), 10(1). https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v10i1.3909

Sakurai, S. (2015). Bilingual education in primary school: Aspects of immersion, CLIL, and bilingual modules. Language and Education, 29(1), 83–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.895104

Sansanwal, D. N. (2020). Use of ICT in teaching-learning & evaluation. In Journal of Xidian University (Vol. 14, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.37896/jxu14.5/642

Setyaningrum, R. W., & Purwati, O. (2020). Projecting the implementation feasibility of CLIL approach for TEYL at primary schools in Indonesia. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 5(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v5i1.352

Tachaiyaphum, N., & Sukying, A. (2017). EFL pre-service teachers’ perceptions of CLIL. Asian Education Studies, 2(4), 44. https://doi.org/10.20849/aes.v2i4.283

Tsuchiya, K., & Murillo, M. D. P. (2019). Content and language integrated learning in Spanish and Japanese contexts: Policy, practice and pedagogy. In Content and language integrated learning in Spanish and Japanese contexts. Springer Nature.

Usman, H., Ferdiansyah, S., Widodo, H. P., & Lestariyana, R. P. D. (2020). Primary School English Teachers’ Perceptions of the Teacher Educator-Created English Textbook: The Case of Indonesia. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 17(3), 1057–1067.

Yamano, Y. (2013). Using the CLIL approach in a japanese primary school: A comparative study of CLIL and EFL lessons. The Asian EFL Journal, 15(4), 160–183.

Yang, W. (2016). An investigation of learning efficacy, management difficulties and improvements in tertiary CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) programmes in Taiwan: A survey of stakeholder perspectives. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(1), 64–109. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.9.1.4

Yilmaz, F., & Şeker, M. (2013). Young learners’ perceptions on learning languages through CLIL and ICT. Academica Science Journal, 1(1), 42–48.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v9i2.4347


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 English Review: Journal of English Education