THE EFFECT OF USING QUIZIZZ TO EFL STUDENTS’ ENGAGEMENT AND LEARNING OUTCOME
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
The objectives of the research are to find out the extent of students' engagement in EFL learning before using Quizizz application, to find out students' score results from the test using Quizizz application, to find out the extent of students' behavior during the EFL learning and to find out the effect after using Quizizz to students' engagement and learning outcomes in EFL learning. This research applies a one-shot case study on explanatory quantitative research design to describe a phenomenon on the effectiveness of student engagement and learning outcomes after using Quizizz application in the EFL classroom of the 5th semester at the English Education Department in Universitas Sulawesi Barat. There are four classes and the researcher took one class purposively. The data are collected by employing preliminary and final surveys, treatments, direct observation, and tests. Structural equation modeling analyses show that using Quizizz application gave constructively contribution to some of the dependent variables. The effect of using Quizizz has the highest contribution or influence on the students' psychomotor outcomes. Next is to the effect of using Quizizz to the students' cognitive and affective outcomes. Moreover, student engagement is little or not significantly affected by the use of Quizizz. The conclusion highlights the importance, although currently ignored, ways that students contribute depends on the flow of the instruction they received. Moreover, the learning environment encourages students to think. As a concern to the teacher that students need motivational elements than a scoring system to increase their motivation.
Rincian Artikel
##submission.howToCite##
Munawir, A., & Hasbi, N. P. (2021). THE EFFECT OF USING QUIZIZZ TO EFL STUDENTS’ ENGAGEMENT AND LEARNING OUTCOME. English Review: Journal of English Education, 10(1), 297-308. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v10i1.5412
Terbitan
Bagian
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Referensi
Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R. (Eds.), 2001. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives, Complete ed. ed. Longman, New York.
Andrew, C., 2008. Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy, revised. ed. Kristin School.
Appleton, J.J., Christenson, S.L., Furlong, M.J., 2008. Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools 45, 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20303
Aşıksoy, G., Sorakin, Y., 2018. THE EFFECTS OF CLICKER-AIDED FLIPPED CLASSROOM MODEL ON LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT, PHYSICS ANXIETY AND STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS.
Battin-Pearson, S., Newcomb, M.D., Abbott, R.D., Hill, K.G., Catalano, R.F., Hawkins, J.D., 2000. Predictors of early high school dropout: A test of five theories. Journal of Educational Psychology 92, 568–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.568
Beer, C., Clark, K., Jones, D., n.d. Indicators of Engagement 11.
Bicen, H., Kocakoyun, S., 2018. Perceptions of Students for Gamification Approach: Kahoot as a Case Study. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) 13, 72-. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i02.7467
Biggs, J., 2003. Aligning Teaching for Constructing Learning. The Higher Education Academy.
Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy, 2015. URL https://www.commonsense.org/education/video/blooms-digital-taxonomy
Bloom’s Verb Digital Taxonomy, 2019. . BINUS University.
Broughton, G. (Ed.), 1980. Teaching English as a foreign language: by] Geoffrey Broughton ... [et al., 2nd ed. ed, Routledge education books. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London [etc.].
Bungin, B., 2005. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Kencana.
Butcher, C., Davies, C., Highton, M. (Eds.), 2006. Designing learning: from module outline to effective teaching, Key guides for effective teaching in higher education series. Routledge, New York, NY.
Carsono, N., 2014. Penyusunan Learning Outcomes Mata Kuliah.
Crano, W.D., Prislin, R., 2006. Attitudes and Persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology 57, 345–374. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190034
Creswell, J.W., 2014. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 4th ed. ed. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks.
da Rocha Seixas, L., Gomes, A.S., de Melo Filho, I.J., 2016. Effectiveness of gamification in the engagement of students. Computers in Human Behavior 58, 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.021
Evolution, S.L., n.d. Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris Abad 21. Semesta Learning Evolution. URL https://sle.co.id/news/pembelajaran-bahasa-inggris-abad-21/ (accessed 9.18.19).
Explanatory Research, 2008. , in: The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. SAGE Publications, Inc., 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n164
Figueroa, J.F., 2015. Using Gamification to Enhance Second Language Learning, Digital Education Review. Universidad del Este, Puerto Rico.
Frankfort-Nachmias, C., Nachmias, D., 1996. Research methods in the social sciences, 5th ed. ed. St. Martin’s Press, New York.
Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., Paris, A.H., 2004. School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research 74, 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Gadiyar, A.R., 2014. Gamification 3.0: The Power of Personalization.
getting-started.pdf, n.d.
Gonyea, R.M., Kuh, G.D., 2009. NSSE, organizational intelligence, and the institutional researcher. New Directions for Institutional Research 2009, 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.290
Hair, J.F. (Ed.), 2017. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), Second edition. ed. Sage, Los Angeles.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., Sarsa, H., 2014. Does Gamification Work? -- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification, in: 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Presented at the 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), IEEE, Waikoloa, HI, pp. 3025–3034. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
Kapp, K.M., 2012. The gamification of learning and instruction: game-based methods and strategies for training and education. Pfeiffer, San Francisco, CA.
KKNI Team, 2015. Paradigma Capaian Pembelajaran.
Koenigs, S.S., Fiedler, M.L., Decharms, R., 1977. Teacher Beliefs, Classroom Interaction and Personal Causation1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 7, 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1977.tb01332.x
Kuh, G.D., 2009. What Student Affairs Professionals Need to Know About Student Engagement. Journal of College Student Development 50, 683–706. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0099
Leaning, M., 2015. A study of the use of games and gamification to enhance student engagement, experience and achievement on a theory-based course of an undergraduate media degree. Journal of Media Practice 16, 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14682753.2015.1041807
Mac Namara, D., Murphy, L., 2017. Online Versus Offline Perspectives on Gamified Learning.
Maloshonok, N., 2014. Vygotsky’s Theory: Lessons for Student Engagement Research 13.
Michelini, M., Groupe International de Recherche sur l’Enseignement de la Physique (Eds.), 2004. Quality development in teacher education and training: second international GIREP seminar 2003 ; selected contributions ; [1 - 6 September 2003, Udine, Italy]. Forum, Ed. Univ. Udinese, Udine.
Muntean, C.I., 2011. Raising Engagement in e-Learning Through Gamification. University of Bucharest and “Babeş-Bolyai” University 324 of Cluj-Napoca, The 6th International Conference on Virtual Learning ICVL 2011 323–329.
NAIS - 2016 NAIS Report on the High School Survey of Student Engagement [WWW Document], n.d. URL https://www.nais.org/articles/pages/research/2016-nais-report-on-the-high-school-survey-of-student-engagement/ (accessed 9.10.19).
Oermann, M.H., 1990. Psychomotor skill development. J Contin Educ Nurs 21, 202–204.
Pace, C.R., 1984. Measuring the Quality of College Student Experiences. An Account of the Development and Use of the College Student Experiences Questionnaire. Higher Education Research Institute, Graduate School of Education, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024 ($7.
Papalia, D.E., Olds, S.W., Feldman, R.D., 2009. Human Development. McGraw-Hill.
Perry, V., Albeg, L., Tung, C., 2012. Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Design Research on Self-Regulatory Interventions for Academic Performance. J Behav Educ 21, 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-012-9156-y
Porcaro, P.A., Jackson, D.E., McLaughlin, P.M., O’Malley, C.J., 2016. Curriculum Design of a Flipped Classroom to Enhance Haematology Learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology 25, 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9599-8
Poth, R.D., 2018. 12 Digital Tools to Try in 2018. Getting Smart. URL https://www.gettingsmart.com/2018/01/12-tools-to-try-in-2018/ (accessed 3.26.19).
Quizizz raises $3 million and surpasses 10 million users [WWW Document], n.d. URL https://venturebeat.com/2018/08/09/Quizizz-raises-3-million-and-surpasses-10-million-users/ (accessed 3.27.19).
Ramsden, P., 1992. Learning to teach in higher education. Routledge, London ; New York.
Reeve, J., Tseng, C.-M., 2011. Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology 36, 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
Rienecker, L., Jørgensen, P.S., Skov, S., 2015. The good paper: a handbook for writing papers in higher education.
Robbins, S.P., Judge, T., 2007. Organizational behavior, 12th ed. ed. Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
sentence structure - Dictionary Definition [WWW Document], n.d. . Vocabulary.com. URL https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/sentence%20structure (accessed 9.30.19).
Shaffer David Williamson, halverson R., Squire Kurt R., G.J.P., 2005. Video Games and the Future of Learning. WCER Working Paper 87, 104–111.
Sullivan, P., Mornane, A., Prain, V., Campbell, C., Deed, C., Drane, S., Faulkner, M., McDonough, A., Smith, C., 2009. Junior Secondary Students’ Perceptions of Influences on Their Engagement with Schooling. Australian Journal of Education 53, 176–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494410905300206
Tobi, H., Kampen, J.K., 2018. Research design: the methodology for interdisciplinary research framework. Qual Quant 52, 1209–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0513-8
Tyas, N., 2018. Pemanfaatan Aplikasi Digital Learning Untuk Pembelajaran Pengayaan di Sekolah Menengah Kota Surabaya. Departemen Sistem Informasi, Fakultas Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.
van Rosmalen, P., Westera, W., 2014. Introducing serious games with Wikis: empowering the teacher with simple technologies. Interactive Learning Environments 22, 564–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.707128
Werbach, K., Hunter, D., 2012. For the win: how game thinking can revolutionize your business. Wharton Digital Press, Philadelphia.
What is Quizizz? [WWW Document], n.d. . Help Center. URL http://Quizizz.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/203610052-What-is-Quizizz- (accessed 9.19.19).
Williams, M., Burden, R.L., 1997. Psychology for language teachers: a social constructivist approach, Cambridge language teaching library. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge ; New York.
Zhao, F., 2019. Using Quizizz to Integrate Fun Multiplayer Activity in the Accounting Classroom. International Journal of Higher Education 8, 37. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n1p37
Žukauskas, P., Vveinhardt, J., Andriukaitienė, R., 2018. Exploratory Research, in: Žukauskas, P., Vveinhardt, J., Andriukaitien?, R. (Eds.), Management Culture and Corporate Social Responsibility. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.70631
Andrew, C., 2008. Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy, revised. ed. Kristin School.
Appleton, J.J., Christenson, S.L., Furlong, M.J., 2008. Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools 45, 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20303
Aşıksoy, G., Sorakin, Y., 2018. THE EFFECTS OF CLICKER-AIDED FLIPPED CLASSROOM MODEL ON LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT, PHYSICS ANXIETY AND STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS.
Battin-Pearson, S., Newcomb, M.D., Abbott, R.D., Hill, K.G., Catalano, R.F., Hawkins, J.D., 2000. Predictors of early high school dropout: A test of five theories. Journal of Educational Psychology 92, 568–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.568
Beer, C., Clark, K., Jones, D., n.d. Indicators of Engagement 11.
Bicen, H., Kocakoyun, S., 2018. Perceptions of Students for Gamification Approach: Kahoot as a Case Study. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) 13, 72-. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i02.7467
Biggs, J., 2003. Aligning Teaching for Constructing Learning. The Higher Education Academy.
Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy, 2015. URL https://www.commonsense.org/education/video/blooms-digital-taxonomy
Bloom’s Verb Digital Taxonomy, 2019. . BINUS University.
Broughton, G. (Ed.), 1980. Teaching English as a foreign language: by] Geoffrey Broughton ... [et al., 2nd ed. ed, Routledge education books. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London [etc.].
Bungin, B., 2005. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Kencana.
Butcher, C., Davies, C., Highton, M. (Eds.), 2006. Designing learning: from module outline to effective teaching, Key guides for effective teaching in higher education series. Routledge, New York, NY.
Carsono, N., 2014. Penyusunan Learning Outcomes Mata Kuliah.
Crano, W.D., Prislin, R., 2006. Attitudes and Persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology 57, 345–374. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190034
Creswell, J.W., 2014. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 4th ed. ed. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks.
da Rocha Seixas, L., Gomes, A.S., de Melo Filho, I.J., 2016. Effectiveness of gamification in the engagement of students. Computers in Human Behavior 58, 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.021
Evolution, S.L., n.d. Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris Abad 21. Semesta Learning Evolution. URL https://sle.co.id/news/pembelajaran-bahasa-inggris-abad-21/ (accessed 9.18.19).
Explanatory Research, 2008. , in: The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. SAGE Publications, Inc., 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n164
Figueroa, J.F., 2015. Using Gamification to Enhance Second Language Learning, Digital Education Review. Universidad del Este, Puerto Rico.
Frankfort-Nachmias, C., Nachmias, D., 1996. Research methods in the social sciences, 5th ed. ed. St. Martin’s Press, New York.
Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., Paris, A.H., 2004. School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research 74, 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Gadiyar, A.R., 2014. Gamification 3.0: The Power of Personalization.
getting-started.pdf, n.d.
Gonyea, R.M., Kuh, G.D., 2009. NSSE, organizational intelligence, and the institutional researcher. New Directions for Institutional Research 2009, 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.290
Hair, J.F. (Ed.), 2017. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), Second edition. ed. Sage, Los Angeles.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., Sarsa, H., 2014. Does Gamification Work? -- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification, in: 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Presented at the 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), IEEE, Waikoloa, HI, pp. 3025–3034. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
Kapp, K.M., 2012. The gamification of learning and instruction: game-based methods and strategies for training and education. Pfeiffer, San Francisco, CA.
KKNI Team, 2015. Paradigma Capaian Pembelajaran.
Koenigs, S.S., Fiedler, M.L., Decharms, R., 1977. Teacher Beliefs, Classroom Interaction and Personal Causation1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 7, 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1977.tb01332.x
Kuh, G.D., 2009. What Student Affairs Professionals Need to Know About Student Engagement. Journal of College Student Development 50, 683–706. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0099
Leaning, M., 2015. A study of the use of games and gamification to enhance student engagement, experience and achievement on a theory-based course of an undergraduate media degree. Journal of Media Practice 16, 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14682753.2015.1041807
Mac Namara, D., Murphy, L., 2017. Online Versus Offline Perspectives on Gamified Learning.
Maloshonok, N., 2014. Vygotsky’s Theory: Lessons for Student Engagement Research 13.
Michelini, M., Groupe International de Recherche sur l’Enseignement de la Physique (Eds.), 2004. Quality development in teacher education and training: second international GIREP seminar 2003 ; selected contributions ; [1 - 6 September 2003, Udine, Italy]. Forum, Ed. Univ. Udinese, Udine.
Muntean, C.I., 2011. Raising Engagement in e-Learning Through Gamification. University of Bucharest and “Babeş-Bolyai” University 324 of Cluj-Napoca, The 6th International Conference on Virtual Learning ICVL 2011 323–329.
NAIS - 2016 NAIS Report on the High School Survey of Student Engagement [WWW Document], n.d. URL https://www.nais.org/articles/pages/research/2016-nais-report-on-the-high-school-survey-of-student-engagement/ (accessed 9.10.19).
Oermann, M.H., 1990. Psychomotor skill development. J Contin Educ Nurs 21, 202–204.
Pace, C.R., 1984. Measuring the Quality of College Student Experiences. An Account of the Development and Use of the College Student Experiences Questionnaire. Higher Education Research Institute, Graduate School of Education, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024 ($7.
Papalia, D.E., Olds, S.W., Feldman, R.D., 2009. Human Development. McGraw-Hill.
Perry, V., Albeg, L., Tung, C., 2012. Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Design Research on Self-Regulatory Interventions for Academic Performance. J Behav Educ 21, 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-012-9156-y
Porcaro, P.A., Jackson, D.E., McLaughlin, P.M., O’Malley, C.J., 2016. Curriculum Design of a Flipped Classroom to Enhance Haematology Learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology 25, 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9599-8
Poth, R.D., 2018. 12 Digital Tools to Try in 2018. Getting Smart. URL https://www.gettingsmart.com/2018/01/12-tools-to-try-in-2018/ (accessed 3.26.19).
Quizizz raises $3 million and surpasses 10 million users [WWW Document], n.d. URL https://venturebeat.com/2018/08/09/Quizizz-raises-3-million-and-surpasses-10-million-users/ (accessed 3.27.19).
Ramsden, P., 1992. Learning to teach in higher education. Routledge, London ; New York.
Reeve, J., Tseng, C.-M., 2011. Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology 36, 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
Rienecker, L., Jørgensen, P.S., Skov, S., 2015. The good paper: a handbook for writing papers in higher education.
Robbins, S.P., Judge, T., 2007. Organizational behavior, 12th ed. ed. Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
sentence structure - Dictionary Definition [WWW Document], n.d. . Vocabulary.com. URL https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/sentence%20structure (accessed 9.30.19).
Shaffer David Williamson, halverson R., Squire Kurt R., G.J.P., 2005. Video Games and the Future of Learning. WCER Working Paper 87, 104–111.
Sullivan, P., Mornane, A., Prain, V., Campbell, C., Deed, C., Drane, S., Faulkner, M., McDonough, A., Smith, C., 2009. Junior Secondary Students’ Perceptions of Influences on Their Engagement with Schooling. Australian Journal of Education 53, 176–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494410905300206
Tobi, H., Kampen, J.K., 2018. Research design: the methodology for interdisciplinary research framework. Qual Quant 52, 1209–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0513-8
Tyas, N., 2018. Pemanfaatan Aplikasi Digital Learning Untuk Pembelajaran Pengayaan di Sekolah Menengah Kota Surabaya. Departemen Sistem Informasi, Fakultas Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.
van Rosmalen, P., Westera, W., 2014. Introducing serious games with Wikis: empowering the teacher with simple technologies. Interactive Learning Environments 22, 564–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.707128
Werbach, K., Hunter, D., 2012. For the win: how game thinking can revolutionize your business. Wharton Digital Press, Philadelphia.
What is Quizizz? [WWW Document], n.d. . Help Center. URL http://Quizizz.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/203610052-What-is-Quizizz- (accessed 9.19.19).
Williams, M., Burden, R.L., 1997. Psychology for language teachers: a social constructivist approach, Cambridge language teaching library. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge ; New York.
Zhao, F., 2019. Using Quizizz to Integrate Fun Multiplayer Activity in the Accounting Classroom. International Journal of Higher Education 8, 37. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n1p37
Žukauskas, P., Vveinhardt, J., Andriukaitienė, R., 2018. Exploratory Research, in: Žukauskas, P., Vveinhardt, J., Andriukaitien?, R. (Eds.), Management Culture and Corporate Social Responsibility. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.70631