POLITICAL ACTIVIST COMMUNITY PORTRAIT IN LEILA S. CHUDORI’S NOVEL LAUT BERCERITA

Efendi Barus, Saiful Anwar Matondang, M. Manugeren, Purwarno Purwarno, Purwanto Siwi, Susi Ekalestari, Sri Wulan

Abstract


In the process of democratization in a state, the position of university students is decisive. Every student must be responsible to the society, able to see what is happening and to provide the best solutions to the societal problems as well as being a mouthpiece from the common people to the government, nation and state. In addition to developing their cognitive abilitie0s, students are required to participate actively in everything that is social in nature to foster a social spirit in the community. This picture is reflected in the political activist community in the novel Laut Bercerita by Leila S. Chudori. The research was conducted using a literary sociology approach related to the author's relationship with society and texts revealing problems in society. The focus of the research is related to the disclosure of social phenomena. Holistically, a qualitative descriptive research method is implemented. The data source is the novel and data collection is based on documentation techniques, obtained from the novel in the forms text referring to the attitudes of the students in their struggle for reform in all areas of public life  and also based on  the content analysis techniques with an objective approach. The results of the study show that the attitudes reflected in the political activist movement are social awareness, hard work and tolerance.


Keywords


hard work; social awareness; tolerance.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Albarracin, D., and Shavitt, S. (2017). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 299-327 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011911

Alwaqaa, M. A. (2020). Sociology and literature: An interdisciplinary approach. Journal of Liberal Arts and Humanities,1(10), 34-38.

Arifin, B. S. (2015). Psikologi Sosial. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Barnwell, A. (2015). Enduring divisions: Critique, method, and questions of value in the sociology of literature. Cultural Sociology,9(4), 550-566. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975515587716

Bates, R. A. (2015). The sociological perspective. The Journal of Public and Professional Sociology, 7(1), 1–7.

Bertens, H. (2018). Literary theory. London: Taylor & Francis.

Berger, J. (2014). Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. J. Consum. Psychol, 24(4), 586–607.

Blankenship, K. L., Wegener, D. T., and Murray, R. A. (2015). Values, inter-attitudinal structure, and attitude change: Value accessibility can increase a related attitude's resistance to change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(12), 1739–1750.

Boer, D, and Fischer, R. (2013). How and when do personal values guide our attitudes and sociality? Explaining cross-cultural variability in attitude-value linkages. Psychological Bulletin, 139(5),1113–1147.

Briscoe, F. and Gupta, A. (2016). Social activism in and around organizations. Academy of Management, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1153261

Bruce, I. (2016). Constructing critical stance in university essays in English literature and sociology. English for Specific Purposes, 42, 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.10.005

Calanchini, J. & Sherman, J. W. (2013). Implicit attitudes reflect associative, non-associative, and non-attitudinal processes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(9), 654–667.

Chen, J. M., and Hamilton, D. L. (2015). Understanding diversity: The importance of social acceptance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(4), 586-598.

Cooley, C. H., and Rieff, P. (2017). Social organization. New York: Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. New York: Sage Publications.

Damono, S. D. (2020). Sosiologi sastra. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Dubey, A. (2013). Literature and society. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 9(6), 84-85.

Chudori, L.S. (2017). Laut bercerita. Jakarta: KPG (Kepustakaan Popular Gramedia).

Duhan, R. (2015). The relationship between literature and society. Language in India,15(4). Retrieved from www.languageinindia.com.

Faruk. (2019). Pengantar sosiologi sastra. Yogyakarata: Pustaka Pelajar.

Feldman, G. and Albarracín, D. (2016). Norm theory and the action-effect: The role of social norms in regret following action and inaction. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 69, 111–120.

Fonagy, P., Luyten, P., Allison, E., and Campbell, C. (2017). What we have changed our minds about: Part 2 borderline personality disorder, epistemic trust and the developmental significance of social communication. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 4(9). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-017-0062-8

Frishka, S., Gultom, O., Timbul, H., Indah, E. and Yusuf, Y. (2007). Kerusuhan Mei 1998 fakta, data & analisa: Mengungkap kerusuhan Mei 1998 sebagai kejahatan terhadap kemanusiaan. Jakarta: Solidaritas Nusa Bangsa.

Gawronski, B., Rydell, R. J., Houwer, J. D., Brannon, S. M., Ye, Y., Vervliet, B. and Hu, X. (2018). Chapter one – contextualized attitude change. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 57, 1 -52.

Hawa, M., Andayani, Suyitno, and Wardani, N. E. (2019). The implementation of literary sociology learning model with contextual and spiritual quotient approach to teach literary sociology. International Journal of Instruction, 2(1), 283-298.

Howe, L. C., and Krosnick, J. A. (2017). Attitude strength. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 327 – 351.

Huynh, Son Van. (2018). Social awareness and responsible decision making of students in grade 4 and 5 in Vietnam. Journal of Education and Human Development, 7(4), 7-15.

Kahu, E. R., and Nelson, K. (2017). Student engagment in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research and Development, 37(1), 58-71.

Leary, M. R. (2015). Emotional responses to interpersonal rejection. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 17(4), 435 – 441.

Maxwell, J. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Meiliana, S. (2019). Sociology of literature. Jakarta: Pustaka Mandiri.

Mukhsin, H. N. (2022). Cost and benefit of revenge: A sociology of literature study on Sidney Sheldon’s master of the game. Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics & literature Studies, 2(1), 244-258.

Mursalim, M. (2019). A sociological approach of literature in short story senyum yang kekal by Korrie Layun Rampan. The 28th International Conference on Literature (ICol) XXVII. 1(1), 270-276.

Oatley, K. (2016). Fiction: Simulation of social worlds. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 618-628.

Oldfield, S. (2014). Between activism and the academy: The urban as political terrain. Urban Studies, 52(11), 2072-2086.

Pattiwael, A. (2019). Literature for developing student humanity awareness. Journal International Seminar on Language, Literature, Arts and Education, 1(1), 79-88.

Picton, C., Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2018). Hardworking, determined and happy’: First-year students’ understanding and experience of success. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(6), 1260-1273.

Powell, S. (2015). Writing historical fiction: A writer’s and artists’ companion. Reference Reviews, 29(1), 37-37. https://doi.org/10.1108/RR-08-2014-0234

Rieffe, C. and Camodeca, M. (2016). Empathy in adolescence: Relations with emotion awareness and social roles. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 34(3), 340-353.

Schooner-Reichl, K. A. (2017). Social and emotional learning and teachers. Spring, 27(1), 137 – 155.

Sharma, S.. (2020). Literature and society. Retrived from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343499627_Literature_and_Society_Abstract/link/5f2cda9192851cd302e5017d/download. (Accessed: January 3, 2023)

Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa: Pengantar

penelitian wahana kebudayaan secara linguistik. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.

Teeuw, A. (2013). Sastra dan ilmu sastra. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.

van Doorn, M. V. (2014). The nature of tolerance and the social circumstances in which it emerges. Current Sociology, 62(6), 905–927.

Velthuis, E., Smeekes, A., and Verkuyten, M. (2021). The different faces of social tolerance: Conceptualizing and measuring respect and coexistence tolerance. Social Indicators Research, 158(1), 1105–1125.

Victoria, A. D. (2021). Sociology of the arts: Exploring fine and popular forms. John Wiley & Sons.

Widjayanti, E. P. (2019). Building humanity values through maya angelou's poems. Journal International Seminar on Languages, Literature, Arts and Education (ISLLAE), 1(1), 143-148.

Wieser, C. (2022). The development of pedagogical competence in tacit knowledge. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical, 48(2), 22-35.

Yuen, S. (2023). Tolerant solidarity with violent protesters: Evidence from a survey experiment. Journal of Conflict Resolution, e1154451. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220027231154451




DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v11i1.7540

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 English Review: Journal of English Education