THE INFUSION OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS INDICATORS AND MICROLEARNING PRINCIPLES IN THE ENGLISH READING Materials for Vocational School Students: A Content Analysis

  • Sri Sumarni Magister of English Language Education, Faculty of Language and Arts, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Farah Salsabila Magister of English Language Education, Faculty of Language and Arts, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: Critical thinking skills, microlearning characteristics, English reading materials, vocational school

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the critical thinking skills indicators and microlearning features integrated in the English reading materials for vocational school students in Indonesia. A content analysis was employed to examine reading materials available in the English Coursebook Work in Progress for SMA/SMK/MA Grade X published by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia 2022. The critical thinking skills analysis was meant to capture to what extend do the reading materials coverage signify to the lifelong learning, while the microlearning features investigation was meant to portray how the reading materials are presented to support self-directed learning. 8 critical thinking skills indicators proposed by Anderson and Krathwohl. (2001) were hired as the parameters in determining the integration of the critical thinking skills. Microlearning framework proposed by Allela (2021) were used to determine the reading lesson sequences, with which instructional methods associating each sequence. The results revealed that the reading materials for grade X are presented in 8 printed texts covered descriptive, recount, procedures, expository and narrative. These texts have potentially carried critical thinking skills indicators. The contexts are all pictures and instructions that have potentially presented 3 critical thinking skill indicators. The activities cover 15 comprehension activities and 4 beyond the comprehension activities; 7 Critical thinking indicators are potentially embedded in this part. The reading materials presentation, one set are clearly sequenced in the framework of microlearning covers pre-text, text, and post-text. While the other 7 sets sequenced text and post-text. The analysis indicated most of the critical thinking indicators integrated in the reading materials are under analysis and evaluation. 

References

Abkary, N. S., & Purnawarman, P. (2020). Indonesian EFL Teachers’ Challenges in Assessing Students’ Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). 509(Icollite), 482–489. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201215.076

Abu Sarah, A. M. (2021). Effectiveness of Using Micro Learning Through Web 2.0 Tools in Developing Skills of Multimedia Designing and Production Among 12th Grade Students in Palestine. Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences, 5(32), 59–43. https://doi.org/10.26389/ajsrp.b050421

Agustina, N., Mayuni, I., Iskandar, I., & Ratminingsih, N. M. (2022). Mobile Learning Application: Infusing Critical Thinking in the EFL Classroom. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(2), 724–743. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i2.23476

Allela, M. (2021). Introduction to Microlearning. Commonwealth of Learning. www.col.org

Almazova, N., Rogovaya, Y., & Gavrilova, A. (2018). Prospects of Introduction of Microlearning Into the Process of Teaching Postgraduate Students a Foreign Language. INTED2018 Proceedings, 1(March), 3175–3182. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2018.0608

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. https://www.pdfdrive.com/a-taxonomy-for-learning-teaching-and-assessing-a-revision-of-blooms-taxonomy-of-educational-objectives-d187836328.html

Angrisani, L., Arpaia, P., Bonavolonta, F., & Schiano Lo Moriello, R. (2018). Academic Fablab at University of Naples Federico II: New Research and Development Opportunities in the Fileds of IoT and Industry 4.0. 2018 Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT, MetroInd 4.0 and IoT 2018 - Proceedings, 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/METROI4.2018.8439043

ATD. (2018). Microlearning: Bite-Sized Content. ATD Press.

Ayu, D., Kartika, I., Nurkhamidah, N., & Santosa, I. (2022). Construction of EFL Learning Object Materials for Senior High School. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan (JISIP), 6(4), 2598–9944. https://doi.org/10.36312/jisip.v6i4.3691/http

de Gagne, J. C., Park, H. K., Hall, K., Woodward, A., Yamane, S., & Kim, S. S. (2019). Microlearning in health professions education: Scoping review. JMIR Medical Education, 5(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2196/13997

Demir, B., & Sonmez, G. (2021). Generation Z students’ expectations from English language instruction. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1), 683–701. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.903536

Díaz Redondo, R. P., Caeiro Rodríguez, M., López Escobar, J. J., & Fernández Vilas, A. (2021). Integrating micro-learning content in traditional e-learning platforms. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80(2), 3121–3151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09523-z

Erdiana, N., & Panjaitan, S. (2023). How is HOTS Integrated into the Indonesian High School English Textbook? Studies in English Language and Education, 10(1), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i1.26052

Fedorova, O., Shumskyi, O., Golikova, O., Kutsenko, I., Serdiuk, N., & Zahorodna, O. (2022). Microlearning in Forming the Students’ English Competencies with VR Involvement. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 13(1Sup1), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/13.1sup1/326

Fountain, S. B., & Doyle, K. E. (2012). Learning by Chunking. In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 1814–1817). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1042'

Gunawan, M. H., Rahmawati, E., Suherdi, D., & Yunandami, A. K. (2022). Fostering Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Through High-Level Questioning in Analytical Exposition Text. Indonesian EFL Journal (IEFLJ), 8(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v8i2.6437

Hesse, A., Ospina, P., Wieland, M., Yepes, F. A. L., Nguyen, B., & Heuwieser, W. (2019). Short communication: Microlearning courses are effective at increasing the feelings of confidence and accuracy in the work of dairy personnel. Journal of Dairy Science, 102(10), 9505–9511. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15927

Jahnke, I., Lee, Y. M., Pham, M., He, H., & Austin, L. (2020). Unpacking the Inherent Design Principles of Mobile Microlearning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(3), 585–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09413-w

Kossen, C., & Ooi, C. Y. (2021). Trialling micro-learning design to increase engagement in online courses. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 16(3), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-09-2021-0107

Lee, Y. M., Jahnke, I., & Austin, L. (2021). Mobile microlearning design and effects on learning efficacy and learner experience. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 885–915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09931-w

Makarova, I., Shubenkova, K., Bagateeva, A., & Pashkevich, A. (2018). Digitalization of education as a new destination of e-learning. Proceedings Elmar - International Symposium Electronics in Marine, 2018-Septe(September), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.23919/ELMAR.2018.8534662

Mateus-Nieves; Moreno, E. (2021). Use of microlearning as a strategy to teach mathematics asynchronously. International Journal of Development Research, 11(March). https://doi.org/10.37118/ijdr.21333.03.2021

Mene, N., Ali, S. U., & Syawal, A. M. (2021). Exploring Teachers’ Strategies in Teaching Reading Comprehension at MAN 1 Halut. CAKRAWALA BAHASA Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 10(2), 77–84.

Mohammad Hosseini, H., Ejtehadi, A., & Mohammad Hosseini, M. (2020). Flipping Microlearning-based EFL Classroom to Enhance Learners’ SelfRegulation. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 20, 43–59. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2020.20.03

Mohammed, G. S., Wakil, K., & Nawroly, S. S. (2018). The Effectiveness of Microlearning to Improve Students’ Learning Ability. International Journal of Educational Research Review The, 3(3), 7. https://doi.org/10.30659/e.1.1.68-75

Silva, D., Lopes, T., Sobrinho, M., & Valentim, N. (2021). Investigating Initiatives to Promote the Advancement of Education 4.0: A Systematic Mapping Study. 1(Csedu), 458–466. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010439704580466

Skalka, J., & Drlík, M. (2018). Conceptual Framework of Microlearning-Based Training Mobile Application for Improving Programming Skills (pp. 213–224). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75175-7_22

Sulistiyo, U., Wulan, R., Al Arif, T. Z. Z., Efriza, D., & Anwar, K. (2021). A critical content analysis of english textbook for senior high school students in indonesia. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(1), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i1.16778

Widiantarai, N. M. D. P. (2017). Developing E-Learning-Based English Material for Teaching the Tenth Grade Students of Light Vehicle Department at SMK N Bali Mandara. Journal of Psychology and Instructions, 1(3), 142. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpai.v1i3.12576

Winanti, Gaol, F. L., Napitupulu, T. A., Soeparno, H., & Trisetyarso, A. (2019). Learning Framework in the Industrial Age 4.0 in Higher Education. 1st 2018 Indonesian Association for Pattern Recognition International Conference, INAPR 2018 - Proceedings, 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1109/INAPR.2018.8627039

Published
2023-10-27
How to Cite
Sumarni, S., & Salsabila, F. (2023). THE INFUSION OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS INDICATORS AND MICROLEARNING PRINCIPLES IN THE ENGLISH READING Materials for Vocational School Students: A Content Analysis. English Review: Journal of English Education, 11(3), 699-708. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v11i3.8819
Section
Articles