COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SYNTACTIC COMPLEXITY IN INDONESIAN GRADUATE-LEVEL WRITING: A CORPUS STUDY OF MASTER'S THESES VERSUS DOCTORAL DISSERTATIONS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Syntactic complexity is an essential indicator of English Foreign Language (EFL) students' academic writing quality. Previous studies analyzed and compared syntactic complexity in published research articles through large-grained measures. However, the study of syntactic complexity unpublished research at graduate level gains less attentions. Thus, this study tried to fill the gap by analyzing and comparing syntactic complexity of master theses and doctoral dissertations that written by Indonesian students through fine-grained measures. This study conducted a quantitative design of a corpus-based method. The corpus data consists of two sub-corpora that selected through stratified sampling technique based on years and issues. Those were 52 doctoral dissertations and 74 master theses from English Language Education of Universitas Negeri Malang. The twelve phrasal complexity measures were employed through Tool for the Automatic Analysis of Syntactic Sophistication and Complexity (TAASSC) tool created by Kyle (2016). The finding showed the characteristics of Indonesian graduate-level writing that they were intended to utilize more dependents per direct object (standard deviation) measures, and fewer dependents per nominal (standard deviation) measures in their writing. It also showed doctoral dissertations have higher quality than master theses which reflected significant difference in most of phrasal complexity measures. These outcomes offer syntactic complexity insights of Indonesian context. The study highlighted the need more attention to syntactic complexity at graduate-level writing for improving writing quality.
Article Details
All articles published in English Review: Journal of English Education (ERJEE) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Copyright Ownership
Authors retain the copyright of their articles and grant ERJEE the right of first publication. The journal is granted a non-exclusive license to publish, reproduce, and distribute the article in any format, medium, or platform, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors.
License Terms – CC BY 4.0
Under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, others are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially
As long as they:
- Provide appropriate credit to the original author(s) and source
- Provide a link to the license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
- Indicate if any changes were made
There are no restrictions on the reuse, reproduction, or adaptation of published articles as long as attribution is properly given.
Author Warranties
By submitting a manuscript to ERJEE, authors confirm that:
- The work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright.
- The manuscript has not been previously published and is not under consideration elsewhere.
- All sources and references are appropriately acknowledged.
- Necessary permissions have been obtained for any copyrighted materials used.
References
Ansarifar, A., Shahriari, H., & Pishghadam, R. (2018). Phrasal complexity in academic writing: A comparison of abstracts written by graduate students and expert writers in applied linguistics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 31, 58-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.12.008.
Alsahlanee, A., & Jaganathan, P. (2023). Phrasal Syntactic Complexity Measures in Linguistics Research Articles Written by Iraqi and English L1 Writers. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 29(1), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2023-2901-11
Arianto, M. A, Sukhah, A. Basthomi, Y., Wulyani, A.N. (2021). Previous studies have several limitations …: Indonesian Doctoral Students’, Indonesian Academics’, and International Authors’ Research Gap Strategies in ELT Research Article Abstracts and Introductions. Journal of Language & Education, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.11735
Baker, P. 2011. Corpus Method in Linguistics. In Litosselit, L. (2nded.). Research Methods in Linguistics. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Casal, J. E., & Lee, J. J. (2019). Syntactic complexity and writing quality in assessed first-year L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 44, 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.03.005
Dewi, R. (2014). Lexical and Syntactic Complexities in Undergraduate Students’ Research Articles and Their Correlations to Their Quality. Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.
Dong, J., Hao, W., & Buckingham, L. (2022). Mapping out the disciplinary variation of syntactic complexity in student academic writing. System. 113. 102974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102974
Esfandiari, R., & Ahmadi, M. (2021). Syntactic Complexity Measures and Academic Writing Proficiency: A Corpus-based Study of Professional and Students’ Prose. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(3), 745–763. https://10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.3.1.745.
Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. (2018). Measuring syntactic complexity in L2 writing using fine-grained clausal and phrasal indices. The Modern Language Journal, 102(2), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.1246
Lambert, C. & Nakamura, S. (2018). Proficiency-related variation in syntactic complexity: A study of English L1 and L2 oral descriptive discourse. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 29. https://10.1111/ijal.12224.
Liu, L., & Li, L. (2016). Noun phrase complexity in EFL academic writing: a corpus-based study of postgraduate academic writing. Journal of Asia TEFL, 13(1), 48. 10.18823/asiatefl.2016.13.1.1.48.
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards An Organic Approach to Investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555-578. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp044.
Prins, F. J., de Kleijn, R., & van Tartwijk, J. (2016). Students’ use of a rubric for research theses. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(1), 128–150. https://doi. org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1085954.
Rahayu, F. E. S., Utomo, A., & Setyowati, R. (2021). Syntactic and Lexical Complexity of Undergraduate Students’ Essays: A Comparison Study between L1 and L2 Writings. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 5(2), 251. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v5i2.706.
Rofiqoh, Basthomi, Y., Widiati, U., Puspitasari, Y., Marhaban, S., & Sulistyo, T. (2022). Aspects of writing knowledge and EFL students’ writing quality. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(1), 14-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i1.20433
Sahan, A., Saridewi, M. P., Wabang, R. J., & Nabung, A. (2024). Implementation of androidbased augmented reality in English education. English Review: Journal sof English Education, 12(1), 269-282. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v12i1.8595
Shen, C., Guo, J., Shi, P. & Qu, S., & Jiwei, T. (2023). A corpus-based comparison of syntactic complexity in academic writing of L1 and L2 English students across years and disciplines. PLOS ONE. 18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292688
Thi, N.K., Vo, D.V., & Nikolov, M. (2023). Investigating syntactic complexity and language-related error patterns in EFL students’ writing: corpus-based and epistemic network analyses. Language Learning in Higher Education, 13, 127 - 151. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2023-2009
Thompson, P. (2005a). Points of focus and position: Intertextual reference in PhD theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 307-323. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.07.006
Toba, R., Noor, W., Sanu, L. O. (2019). The Current Issues of Indonesian EFL Students’ Writing Skills: Ability, Problem, and Reason in Writing Comparison and Contrast Essay. Dinamika Ilmu. 19. 57-73. 10.21093/di.v19i1.1506.
Wette, R. (2017). Source text use by undergraduate post-novice L2 writers in disciplinary assignments: Progress and ongoing challenges. Journal of Second Language Writing, 37, 46-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.015
Wilson, J. R. (2022). Academic Writing. New York: Harvard University. https://wilson.fas.harvard.edu/files/jeffreywilson/files/jeffrey_r._wilson_academic_writing.pdf
Wisker, G. (2019). Developing scientific thinking and research skills through the research thesis or dissertation. In M. Murtonen, & K. Balloo (Eds.), Redefining scientific thinking for higher education (pp. 203–232). Cham: Palmgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24215-2_9
Xu, J & Li, J. (2021). A syntactic complexity analysis of translational English across genres. Across Languages and Cultures. 22. 214-232. https://10.1556/084.2021.00015.
Yin, S., Gao, Y., & Lu, X. (2021). Syntactic complexity of research article part-genres: Differences between emerging and expert international publication writers. System, 97, 102-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102427
Zen, E.L. (2020). Role of Regional Language Background and Speech Styles on the Production of Voice Onset Time (VOT) in English among Indonesian Multilinguals. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10, 359-368. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i2.28604
Ziaeian, E., & Golparvar, S. E. (2022). Fine-grained measures of syntactic complexity in the discussion section of research articles: The effect of discipline and language background. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101116
Zufferey, S. (2020). Introduction to Corpus Linguistics. London: ISTE Ltd. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781119779728